Zap Yourself To Heal A Wound

from the turn-up-the-volts dept

A new report out of New Scientist discusses how some researchers in Europe have worked out how applying electric current to someone’s skin can help speed up the healing of certain wounds. The details aren’t entirely clear from the article, but what’s most interesting is that the new research was apparently based on some research from 150 years ago — that has been mostly ignored since then. It’s not clear why the concept was ignored, or what made these researchers revisit the idea. However, it’s good to see approaches to improving healthcare that go beyond most common areas of research.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Zap Yourself To Heal A Wound”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Posterlogo says:

It was ignored then...

…because it sucked as a treatment, and cannot ever truly be proven not be placebo effect. It still sucks now as a treatment. “New Scientist” is not exactly the New England Journal of Medicine. I’ll wait for the rigorous peer-reviewed science, thank you very much. Feel free to electrocute yourself needlessly.

Insaniac says:

Re: It was ignored then...

Before spouting your foul ‘wisdom’ try looking into the topic you’re weighing in upon.

The article that is referred to in New Scientist clearly states that the test was done on cornea tissue independant of live subjects and the basis for the results are the ions in the body responible for healing damaged tissue. The electric current facilitates their transportation to the injured cells quicker so they can make the necessary repairs faster.

Still sound like a placebo effect? Maybe you should consult New England Journal of Medicine so they can tell you what your opinion will be now that this new information has come to light.

SR says:



There’s a whole body of research about this. One company traces its product origin back to the 1920s and a certain Dr. Royal Rife — but if it goes back further, even better. The best news, though, is it has multiple applications, with purported excellent results.

In the case you cite above, I am guessing that healing speed increased because bacterial growth was inhibited by the electric current. I shall not herein speculate on other matters.

The general premise is that every living organism emits a particular electromagnetic energy field, so by introducing electric current in the range that corresponds to — or exceeds — the organism’s field, you disable or immediately kill said organism (

An extreme case is when a human is struck by lightning. Some people do die, of course — while others have not only survived, but been cured of a serious ailment, e.g., multiple sclerosis (“News of the Weird,” LosAngeles Reader, June 7, 1996).

Since a zapper is generally powered by a small battery, it targets smaller organisms. A recommended zapping session lasts 7-14 minutes, 3-4 times per day (or more, if you’re really sick). Just think how many bacteria, viruses, flukes and roundworms alive and kicking inside you now you could kill in, say, just an hour!*

Like antibiotics, though, it is not selective — but it is easy to replenish the friendly bacteria once the bad guys are gone — and you don’t have any overgrowth of fungi.

This is probably far TMI, but if you want more details:

Zappers (select “Equipment” in left column)—I made my own following Dr. Clark’s schematics in “The Cure for All Diseases,” and it has served me well. This one is definitely more deluxe ($189). (home page is $62 plus or minus.—Someone I know used the LifeForce after she was diagnosed with cervical/vaginal pre-cancer; after using it daily for 2-3 months, she tested free and clear ($1800).

home.php?cat=6 ($4995).

Okay, then, the next question is, why? If there really is a cure for, say, cancer, why don’t they tell us? For one thing, many people think a cure cannot be simple**. For another — well, here is a link that throws some light on the bottom line (I have not substantiated this information, but read something of similar opinion, though no longer posted, at

More online info

Example of Scientific Study

“Medical Hypotheses” (1997) 49, 297-300 @ Pearson Professional Ltd. 1997



I am not a medical doctor, so cannot prescribe any course of action for anyone. This is not medical advice; for such, consult your physician.

But I am a truth seeker and sharer! Please note:

– Other scientists may disagree (do they ever all agree?)

– Dr. Clark is listed on at least one “quack” list (where some names surely should remain) — but I have put many of her ideas to the test, with excellent results. It seems likely that anyone going up against huge business and widely disseminated ideas would end up on such list and otherwise be harrassed — not to mention unique, if not downright eccentric.

* Dr. Clark opines that the zapper current cannot, however, reach some places in the body.

**I am not suggesting that cancer is simple. Each person’s constitution is unique, therefore, may require different treatment or varied applications of a same treatment. Illustration: A 33% cancer cure rate has been reported for patients who adopted the macrobiotic regimen
(Helmich, Portland. “Personal Journey: A Trimph Over Cancer.” Alternative Medicine” magazine. September 2004).

Dan says:


I think this idea is *very* old indeed. Back when I was in junior high I saw a national geographic video about an ancient Egyptian “battery” and some people speculated that its use was medical: that they would put them in a small pool of water and have people sit in the water or keep their feet in them to aid in the healing process.

After a little googling I’ve found a couple URLs:

I could be way off, but I remember that’s what I thought they were used for when I first watched the show about the Baghdad Battery. Interesting stuff…

Rob says:

Of course small currents of electricity could spark (haha) change in our body. They’ve been using electro-convulsive therapy for years to make psychos well, less psycho. Are bodys are great conductors of electricity. They even run on it; neurons fire electrical charges constantly and endlessly. As you sit here reading this post, electrical activity in your brain is going up. Think about it.

Lay Person says:

No Surprise.

No surprise really… we are electrochemical by nature. There is already an electrical treatment for repairing broken bones. It too, not only, accelerates healing but provides for a stronger and more controllable repair. In addition, electromagnetic fields, also, are well known to alleviate certain joint conditions.

I’m just surprised that they act as though this was never considered for 150 years?!?! Makes no sense to me. Sounds like there’s something wrong with this article or the history contained within it.

Anonymous Coward says:

why the meds disregarded this 150 yrs ago cause its too cheap to make any significant revenue from for the whole industry, its simply economic…

i got one of these units for some yrs now and havent gotten a flu or any of that stuff since and i dont really care if its placebo or if it really works when the result i am seeking i obviously get at the end of the day.

CPU (user link) says:

More on zapping and electro-healing

The idea of using electromagnetic therapy goes back to the 1870’s and even further back.

During the period of 1870 to 1936, there was a very large business in a product called the Medical Electric Battery. It was carried by Sears, Montgomery Ward, and Rexall Drugs.

Also shown on the page are several links showin the use of electro-magnetism for healing that goes bac to the time of the Pyramids and ancient Sumerian times.

Zapper (user link) says:

Newest and latest research and even a FDA approval

Using electrical energy to zap cancer cells may sound like a strange idea. But clinical trials at twelve major hospitals around the country are now testing it against the deadliest form of brain cancer.

Also, In 2012, Tumor treatment fields have already been approved by FDA to use for patients with recurring glioblastoma.

For more, see:

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...