Compare And Contrast Blogs And Reuters On Joe Trippi's Speech

from the hmm... dept

Want to see an example of spin? No matter what your politics are, it’s interesting to note the vastly different takes the established media and some bloggers have on this morning’s talk by Joe Trippi at O’Reilly’s Emerging Technologies Conference. This morning I read the detailed notes from both Howard Rheingold and Ross Mayfield on Trippi’s speech – which sounded interesting, if a bit unfocused. However, both sets of notes show that he clearly talked up the power of the internet while trashing the established “broadcast” media. So, when Reuters – a member of the broadcast media – writes up their own article on the talk, they spin it 180 degrees, and say that Trippi blamed the internet for the campaign’s problems. The notes from the blogging attendees say Trippi called the campaign a “dot com miracle”, and yet Reuters claims Trippi said the internet “hobbled” the campaign. These differing accounts of the same exact speech don’t match at all – and it certainly looks like Reuters is the one doing the spinning here, taking a few quotes here and there out of context to make their point. With the bloggers’ notes, you can see the context of what’s being spoken about, and the Reuters report gives none of that. I’m not one who believes that bloggers are a “threat” to journalism, but the contrast here shows a perfect (if a bit scary) example of just how easy it is for the press to spin things to make their point.


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Compare And Contrast Blogs And Reuters On Joe Trippi's Speech”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
6 Comments
Michael (user link) says:

I was there

I was at the session and there is no way it could be construed that Trippi said ‘the internet’ hurt the campaign.
There were a lot of reasons he mentioned, but he consistently said that the use of the internet in politics was having a profound effect on traditional politics.
He specifically mentioned how the traditional broadcast & print media wrote stories on how ‘the internet’ failed. His perspective is that ‘broadcsat media’ doesn’t understand what is going on and wants it to go away. So they send the message that it is going away. Looks like Reuters is simply confirming what Trippi said.

Tim Oren (user link) says:

Re: I was there

I was also there. I’m not particularly a Dean or Trippi fan, but the ‘hobbled’ take is bogus. He talked about some specific problems that arose (or could have arisen) re outsiders misrepresenting themselves as campaign staffers, or infilitrating campaign organizations for oppo research or dirty tricks purposes, both in the online venue. Really old news for anyone that has followed identity and authentication problems on the net. Apparently enough of a handle for some spin from those who are not technical and/or have gotten their story already written. The main thrust of the talk was the ‘net roots’ vs. ‘broadcast politics’ – no way he was dissing the net.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...