RIAA Sues Again… As Promised

from the how-many-12-year-olds-this-time? dept

Realizing they’d lost a little momentum after the Verizon decision and noticing that file sharing is on the rise again, the RIAA still thinks that it can win the war by making a big publicity splash and suing people. The latest, is that they’ve filed 532 new lawsuits against people accused of offering music for download through file sharing networks. Because of the Verizon decision, these lawsuits are all filed against “John Doe” defendants, and they will now try to get legal subpoenas from ISPs to find out who these people are. Once again, this is more of a publicity campaign than a legal campaign, so it will be interesting to see if more stories of “falsely accused” people show up again.

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “RIAA Sues Again… As Promised”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

No Subject Given

They will win this battle until they change their copyrights. Period. While it may cost them a lot of customers in the interim, they will drive home their point. FILE SHARING will not be tolerated.

A more interesting debate might be if the RIAA did forgo this, thinking it’s hopeless, how would the artists react and what rights, if any, would they have in it.

Oh what a tangled web we weave…

::CORY:: says:


I guess you could use the argument that you downloaded File Sharing program X to check it out but you never really used it. And plead ignorance about know that it found all your legit MP3s and plead ignorance to the fact that you didnt know it was running (minimized to tray and hidden) or restarted each time the computer was rebooted.

That and I would love to see someone argue that they only downloaded them to collect them to view in a text file but said that they never listened to a single one of them. Could they prove I listened to them and if they could or couldnt prove that would their copyright still hold up ?

I mean just because it says Metallica – Enter Sandman.mp3 doesnt mean it’s actually a song and how would I know if it was a song for sure or not if I never listened to it. That would be my ignorance plea.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...