Friendster Fakesters – Goodster Or Badster?

from the so-much-hypester dept

Friendster still hasn’t figured out its business model, and it’s already facing backlash from its users. Last month I wrote some of the reasons I wasn’t impressed with the concept, and mentioned the numerous fake profiles. Salon is looking at the phenomenon of fakesters on Friendster and how Friendster’s founder is going around deleting them all – which is upsetting people who thought they were fun and made the service worth using. Some people are now purposely creating fake characters just to piss off the people who run Friendster. The problem is that, in order for the system to work well, it needs as many users as possible – meaning it has to be easy to sign up. When it’s that easy, though, that means it’s just as easy to create fake Friendsters. Either way, already people are saying that the “great age of Friendster” is on the downswing. Update: Oddly, there’s an SF Weekly story on the same exact topic. Who knew Friendster fakesters were worth two whole articles?

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Friendster Fakesters – Goodster Or Badster?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Chad (user link) says:

No Subject Given

This seems premature…I think Friendster can survive it just needs to get creative about its revenue model. Just because a small percentage of the user base is getting hostile doesn’t mean Friendster will die off.

I think they should pay for contacts, maybe like 50 cents to send a message to someone you don’t know. Since the site is a glorified dating site this could make money. Or maybe they have a ridiculously low subscription fee, something like $3 a month, first 4 months free? I mean jeez they have a million users, convert even 1/2 those and it could be profitable.

However OTOH as someone who’s signed up I wouldn’t pay for it, so count me as one of the users who they couldn’t convert.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...