Will Danger's Pricing Destroy The Wireless Industry?
from the short-sighted-thinking dept
While analysts are predicting that T-Mobile’s (eventual) rollout of the Danger device will be met with strong adoption rates by both consumer and business users, they wonder if the flat-rate, all-you-can eat pricing will cause problems for the rest of the wireless industry. They’re afraid that such flat-rate pricing will force others to offer similar data plans, which they’re worried will cut down on revenue from each customer. This seems like a painfully shortsighted view. What they don’t say is that by offering flat-rate pricing, adoption rates and usage are more likely to soar – leading to new ways of using the devices and new services that are likely to significantly increase revenue opportunities. These must be the same analysts who thought that AOL’s flat-rate pricing move many years ago would destroy the ISP industry, instead of suddenly making everyone want to log on to the internet.
Comments on “Will Danger's Pricing Destroy The Wireless Industry?”
flat pricing is the way to go.
Telcos spend millions managing the infrastructure needed to keep track of how many calls when and how to bill properly. When you move towards flat pricing, you can run your business with an excel spreadsheet. Of course this means layoffs.
No Subject Given
Nick May wrote:
>
> What exactly does the term “wireless internet” refer to?
>
> Clearly NOT to an access method (fixed line or wireless).
>
> So to what – a combination of a set of business models involving walled
> gardens and semi proprietary markup?
>
> Or has the term entirely disappeared up its own fundament?
>
> Nick
>
Gee, I thought the term had taken a more nefarious turn… as in
“war driving is not a crime” or Nokia’s most recent definition of
Windows XP’s wireless modality. Of course if Ballmer/Microsoft
is doing it (whatever “it” is), *it* must be *hot*:
http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/02/07/22/020722opcurve.xml
Unfortunately Hoffman was just a little too early to put up the
“steal this bandwidth” web page (and associated access point(s)).
Still… the point is well made that carriers who are late to
the “3G” party may find themselves pumping furiously to get
the last dregs out of the “free beer” keg thanks to all the street
performers chalking up the sidewalks.
Is it bad fourm to show up at a revolution/party in a suite and tie?
Not that keitai’s have become unimportant… it’s just that the
current mores of the average “wireless internet” user have made
the keitai an expensive alternative. The only thing holding back
mass adoption is the right device and demarcationless VoIP. Gota’
wonder what’s going to happen when tLPoE* figure out how to use
Yahoo’s BB VoIP via an unsecured access point. 7yen per miniute
billed to the poor sap with the access point is far too tempting
a target to be left alone (waves arms and mumbles something about
using IPv6 or DNS to provide portability across alien, hostile
carriers and changing end-point numbers)…. and with that (the
inclusion of voice and wireless), I believe I’ve managed to stay
on topic for the list.
Please keep in mind that turning cell phones into P2P devices/nets
won’t stop the tide… 802.11b has an ad hoc mode that people
aren’t paying very much attention to at this particular point in
time (I keep wondering when someone is going to modify the various
GNUTella clients out there to use wireless as hoc… not very
usefull in real life, but could be a neat party trick at a
conference or gathering or Con or average Japanese office). The
final thing to remember about ad hoc is that it potentionally
removes the naughty-naughty out of “wireless internet” use.
* – the Latent Powers of Entropy