Opening Up WiFi Networks To Deny Responsibility

from the good-luck-with-that... dept

A short article in Salon comes across a bit too innocently, about someone who has decided to open up their WiFi access to anyone close enough to use it in order to deny any responsibility for any illegal traffic that goes over his network. This isn't a new argument. It's been used before. The problem is that it's unlikely to work. We've pointed out in the past that all of the RIAA's lawsuits against individuals contain no proof that that particular individual was sharing files, but that hasn't stopped the courts from deeming them valid (though, no one has really tested it yet). In this particular article, the guy uses Comcast, and even taunts them that he'll deny any responsibility if he gets accused of sharing music or movie files. Of course, Comcast will immediately cut him off for violating his terms of service that say he can't share his account via WiFi. In theory, he could even be charged with a felony for helping to share an internet connection. Meanwhile, the article attempts to raise deeper issues that we've touched on before about whose responsibility is it if you get hacked. Is it your own responsibility for having weak security? The writer of this article seems to think that's a perfectly valid excuse - even though he's purposely setting the system up with weak security. Considering the recent fines by the government against companies that set up weak security that allowed them to get hacked, he might not have much of an argument. All of that being said, I do think sharing WiFi is a good idea - if your ISP allows you to do it. I think more ISPs should allow (or even encourage) users to share their connection via WiFi, because it makes the connection that much more useful. That doesn't mean there aren't security concerns, but those can be dealt with if the person setting up the system, and those connecting to it are smart about how they do so.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Beck, May 18th, 2004 @ 6:38pm

    Sharing Can Hurt

    Sharing your Internet connection via WiFi can turn it into a dog.

    I couldn't get WEP to work, so I left my connection open. Recently my speeds slowed to a crawl. I happened to check the DHCP user list, and found that someone was using my connection.

    I turned on logging, and found that, based on the ports being used, they were probably running BitTorrent. So not only did they kill my performance, but now I'm paranoid that I'll be hearing from the IP freaks.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Not A. Zealot, May 18th, 2004 @ 11:41pm

    Re: Sharing can hurt (performance)

    Check out PF: Packet Queueing and Prioritization.
    In it's most simple form, this let's you prioritize your outbound bandwidth, reserving a percentage of the available pipe for your personal use.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Ed, May 19th, 2004 @ 12:33am

    Re: Sharing can hurt (performance)

    Yeah, but if you carefully tweak your connection to prioritize your bandwidth, while avoiding doing anything simple to secure your connection, you're going to have a hard time convincing me (or a judge) that you've got a legitimate excuse for anything that originates from your connection.

    I think it's similar to when the operators of a huge BBS (pre-Internet days) were busted for privacy. The operators claimed that because of the massive size of their BBS, they couldn't police everything for pirated content. But they sure took the effort to make sure that every image or zip file that entered their system got tagged with one of their ads.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Milnesy, May 19th, 2004 @ 7:35am

    but wait.... if I share wifi it's wrong.... but...

    if comcast is offering a linksys wifi router it's ok? I don't understand it... you can hack the comcast branded wifi router to open it up, so would it still be wrong?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    jerkha bherka, Jul 29th, 2006 @ 4:57am

    Are you retarded

    Yes it would, you moron.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Feb 1st, 2007 @ 7:10pm

    This article clearly has an agenda.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This