I assumed from the title that the Knicks Center was some NGO I was unfamiliar with and started by scanning the article for information on it to be able to place it in context.
I disagree; 150k and 377k are both quite small numbers in this context (relative to the number of facebook/instagram posts).
I can't help but imagine ICE showing up at the game publisher to seize the infringing merch.
You're being too hard on Trenton Garmon. He was probably drunk when he wrote the letter. And AL.com probably asked for it.
Yes, Enigma lost and this case is dismissed, but unless Malwarebytes is awarded legal fees, they have lost too.
I somehow don't think most of us would count Craig Brittain in the Senate as a service.
Was there an appeal? The OUP article was published after the 21 day window the judge gave the state for complying with the (2015!) subpoena, but appears to be based solely on a news article published soon after the July decision. 'twould have been nice if it said whether the state was appealing, or, failing that, if the techdirt article did so.
My first reaction is to say this will be fixed when the third party doctrine is removed. But then reading the OUP article clued me in that this is the DEA using an administrative subpoena to access a state database that under state law can only be accessed with a judicial warrant, something that wasn't clear to me from the techdirt article. So I'm not sure the third party doctrine is applicable?
I'm still not entirely sure why Techdirt finds these stories of news sites closing off comments to be such a big dealThese stories fall squarely into the intersection of technology and business models (and how to do or not do them) that is TechDirt's main interest.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/1693/cosponsors
Have at 'em
There's certainly no fundamental First Amendment right for people to use any service they want.
With the fairly important exception of public accommodation and protected classes. The most moving argument for that I've read is Judge Bosson's concurrence in Elane Photography v. Willock (once quoted by Ken White), concluding:
On a larger scale, this case provokes reflection on what this nation is all about, its promise of fairness, liberty, equality of opportunity, and justice. At its heart, this case teaches that at some point in our lives all of us must compromise, if only a little, to accommodate the contrasting values of others. A multicultural, pluralistic society, one of our nation’s strengths, demands no less. The Huguenins are free to think, to say, to believe, as they wish; they may pray to the God of their choice and follow those commandments in their personal lives wherever they lead. The Constitution protects the Huguenins in that respect and much more. But there is a price, one that we all have to pay somewhere in our civic life.
In the smaller, more focused world of the marketplace, of commerce, of public accommodation, the Huguenins have to channel their conduct, not their beliefs, so as to leave space for other Americans who believe something different. That compromise is part of the glue that holds us together as a nation, the to lerance that lubricates the varied moving parts of us as a people. That sense of respect we owe others, whether or not we believe as they do, illuminates this country, setting it apart from the discord that afflicts much of the rest of the world. In short, I would say to the Huguenins, with the utmost respect: it is the price of citizenship. I therefore concur
Ah, the link in the text works, the Donate links top and bottom are missing www.
My mobile chrome browser doesn't like the isupportjournalism.com cert.
https://youtu.be/wMtmlt1eB9g?t=507
Apparently to sign the bill of rights, you need to "Log in to enter this giveaway."
The Reg has a new article by him "FCC death vote looms for the Golden Age of American TV: The inside story of Google's plan to pwn the TV biz".
Wow, do I wish that site offered an Orlowski filter.
name and shame
With prior restraint cases, please do try to name the judge at fault in the article.
That said, it appears Judge McDermott announced his retirement before signing this order, effective January 1.