http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1wKJhfhyzk
worth it to watch past 1:30. You're welcome, Dirtechs.
The last thing I bought from Electronic Arts was for the Sega Genesis. Must've been 18 years ago. I was shocked to hear that they were still around. Doesn't sound like they will for much longer, though.
We can call it Prenda Hour.
You can only play it when Prenda is in court and you must take a shot every time they do or say something stupid or shady.
Anyone up for that kind of challenge?
lol, "POST-modern" but I bet the original post applies.
except to say that I generally don't get into pot-modern folk music, but this version of the (dare I say CLASSIC) Sir-Mix-A-Lot tune was pretty c.o.o.l.
And now he is gone. Bullied to death by a fascist AG and an institution of higher learning (lost all respect for MIT). Funny how Rupert Murdoch hasn't spent a day behind bars for his technology breaches which were of PRIVATE information rather than public information like the stuff in JSTOR which is comprised of content originally meant for public and institutional libraries. Much of the research documented in the journals at JSTOR was publicly funded as well. Guess that access to JUSTICE and INFORMATION truly are only for the wealthy and well connected.
We have lost a great mind today. I am very sad.
R.I.P. Aaron Swartz
Anyone know what the question was that produced the "bullshit" response? I've looked at a couple of articles at other sites but no one seems to be specific.
I took the time to read everything you wrote. I think many here are having an issue with what you consider "valid" to mean. Laws regarding the length of a woman's skirt were written to keep men "moral". Thoughts being that they would be "led into temptation" and harm might come to their immortal soul. That position had enough "validity" with enough people get it onto the law books.
To any law enforcement officer, if you ask, "valid" means if it is still on the books, it is still the law. Hypot: Is the officer then, seeing a woman in short pants, violating the law by not citing the woman? Is that a benign violation?
There are some seriously outdated and socially irrelevant laws on the books. There are also some very badly written and just plain bad laws. Violations of those laws ARE benign and trivial. For instance, in some places, there is still a law on the books that prohibits women from wearing short pants. Yes, this is here in the U.S.A. The problem is that laws are made to reflect social and moral beliefs that are different from one person, region, and time period to the next. Since many of these laws are written by religious zealots or those with a monetary interest; progress, advances in knowledge, and logic do not come into play when repealing or rewriting them. What we're left with is a hodgepodge of secular and religious legalisms that are antithetical to reality.
FTA=Classy title! I wonder how he feels having his name in print next to it? This is a superb example of why I don't want to give up a free internet.
Luv Much, UCH
What if lowering the tax rate and simplifying the tax code were to reduce tax fraud and raise revenues? Would you be asking for more IRS workers to conduct more tax audits? What if building sidewalks overpasses or underground streets in school zones reduced car accidents? Would you still be advocating 15mph speed zones? What if legalizing drugs and providing addiction recovery help and other self help systems for drug addicts reduced the amount of drug users and/or drug related crime? Would you still be crying for longer jail terms?
Common sense. This kind of discourse is why I return to TD time and time again. Hope everyone, even AJ and OOTB, has a peaceful and blessed new year.
is this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl_High_School_shooting
Our teachers and school staff should be armed and trained to use said arms. If the NRA wants to make a point, let it be that we cannot stop the results of one infraction on the Bill of Rights (Gun Free Zones) by creating another infraction on the Bill of Rights. Newton was as bad as it was because teachers can't carry arms, not because there are too many arms.
As to the NRA and this weak diversionary tactic, I would point out again that creating laws that infringe on the First Amendment is just as bad a solution (and illegal) as one that infringes on the Second. There are no "lesser" or less important rights in that bill.
The founders did not intend for Our Constitution and Bill of Rights to be optional, subject to narrow or restricted interpretation, or subject to change. They were written and written vaguely intentionally with broad meanings to keep government from doing exactly the kinds of things they are doing with Speech (?Anti-Protest? Bill H.R. 347) and now are going to try to do with our arms.
Before you react, call your elected officials, and cry out "Won't someone think of the children?", consider that criminals and crazies don't care about gun laws.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun-Free_School_Zones_Act_of_1990#Prohibition_of_unlicensed_carry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Restricted_Buildings_and_Grounds_Improvement_Act_of_2011
millions of nerds suddenly cried out...
So, if I copyright "RIAA" (Really Impressive Acronym Artist)
Long list of "has been"s, "never was"s and "who the hell?"s.
Sorry all. Member this long and just now found the "Submit Story" link on profile page. Won't happen again.
More leaked TPP. Link courtesy of Public Citizen
http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/tppinvestment.pdf
Re: Error
Actually, it is kinda true. We are living in the beginning of a permissions society in America so it is a "now" thing.