Telling someone they can vote by phone is 1st Amendment (albeit a pathetic, moral-lacking thing to do).
Creating a fake phone number system so they believe they have voted sounds an awful lot like a crime.
Convincing hundreds or thousands of other people to participate in that crime sounds like conspiracy.
when is some company going to grow some footballs and challenge this NFL bullsh1t? This unconstitutional crap has gone on far too many years and just keeps getting worse (as evidenced by this story).
Given the amount of stupidity, dumb-assery and down-right criminal activity evidenced thus far....this sounds like being asked to sign up for a Bernie Madoff waitlist AFTER knowing it's a Ponzi scheme!
They'd claim it was Civil Asset Forfeiture and since the money is coming from the government that pretty much ensures it is proceeds of some illegal activity.
I can just imagine how much fun it would be getting the south (in particular) to follow something called "Hammurabi's Code".....they see a muslim conspiracy and start barricading their front doors.
I'm unclear on a point - did they demonetize the accounts or did the advertisers pull their support of the accounts? If the advertisers no longer wish to support the account, then it is absolutely their right to not do so....I don't consider that demonetization. If the platform decided to no longer pay the account or allow anyone to advertise on it, then that would be demonetization. The article doesn't make it clear if the platform sees a difference or which of those two things happened.
They may not be required to police themselves NOW....but if those that want to kill Section 230 would make it so they absolutely MUST do so....they are just getting into practice before it becomes a requirement.
Which is part of the whole mess that drives me the most mad.....not the same competitive market. Cricket sells phones and access while Cricut sells cutting machines and supplies.....should NEVER be a chance of a lawsuit over that, but somebody probably will at some point.
At least the Cricut name isn't close to anything related to the Micro-Brew industry or they'd have been hauled into court repeatedly by now I'm sure!
Should be suing the twitter user for Forging & Distributing fake document - there is no valid 1st Amendment argument supporting a criminal act like that
Should sue the other parties - dependent upon ability to prove they either knew or should have reasonably known material was fake AND that they intended harm
Not saying the court would agree with both arguments but at least that would be the correct way to approach the suit - IMO
Well, since he knew enough to know what her working space was, it would also seem to me that he would know she'd requested remote teaching and been denied.....thus he knew her circumstances. Maybe I'm wrong but he sounds to me like he suffers from rectal-cranial inversion so I'm going to continue thinking he knew and didn't care.
Something was blurred for sure!
The lines here were clearly blurred between friendship and attorney/client.
You’d hope that an actor who once played a cop on TV could figure that out.
Just like their real-life counterparts, tv cops aren't expected to actually know the laws they are tasked to enforce!
The Porn Patrol
Sounds like the only police program that has no problem getting volunteers.
Lying Liars
"Rep. George Santos remains a fascinating study in how far you can get if you have zero shame about just making shit up constantly."
Crime or Constitutional Right?
Telling someone they can vote by phone is 1st Amendment (albeit a pathetic, moral-lacking thing to do). Creating a fake phone number system so they believe they have voted sounds an awful lot like a crime. Convincing hundreds or thousands of other people to participate in that crime sounds like conspiracy.
The big game
when is some company going to grow some footballs and challenge this NFL bullsh1t? This unconstitutional crap has gone on far too many years and just keeps getting worse (as evidenced by this story).
...join a waitlist to participate in the new beta.
Given the amount of stupidity, dumb-assery and down-right criminal activity evidenced thus far....this sounds like being asked to sign up for a Bernie Madoff waitlist AFTER knowing it's a Ponzi scheme!
Judge Alan didn't get the memo
Gloria Allred always wore red but I don't think Judge Alan got the memo....doesn't seem at Albright!
That wouldn't be theft
They'd claim it was Civil Asset Forfeiture and since the money is coming from the government that pretty much ensures it is proceeds of some illegal activity.
If you don't like the comments then don't read them...
Oh, you didn't... AND you didn't even d/l the app... AND you sued anyway? What's that saying about a fool and his money?
Never start a fight
when you have feet made of Klay.
Sanction-lite
Sanction me once, shame on me.....sanction me twice, meh and keep doing the stupid
Re: Hammurabi's Code
I can just imagine how much fun it would be getting the south (in particular) to follow something called "Hammurabi's Code".....they see a muslim conspiracy and start barricading their front doors.
Re:
ick - don't go to a stream to show your speedo, stay at home!
You kids and your new-fangled interwebs!
I'm unclear on a point - did they demonetize the accounts or did the advertisers pull their support of the accounts? If the advertisers no longer wish to support the account, then it is absolutely their right to not do so....I don't consider that demonetization. If the platform decided to no longer pay the account or allow anyone to advertise on it, then that would be demonetization. The article doesn't make it clear if the platform sees a difference or which of those two things happened.
Trump and his minions...
"Section 230 is a unconstitutional, a travesty and a threat to our country. But I'm going to use the hell out of it now that I can!"
Re: Re:
They may not be required to police themselves NOW....but if those that want to kill Section 230 would make it so they absolutely MUST do so....they are just getting into practice before it becomes a requirement.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Cricut?
Which is part of the whole mess that drives me the most mad.....not the same competitive market. Cricket sells phones and access while Cricut sells cutting machines and supplies.....should NEVER be a chance of a lawsuit over that, but somebody probably will at some point. At least the Cricut name isn't close to anything related to the Micro-Brew industry or they'd have been hauled into court repeatedly by now I'm sure!
Not suing all the responsible parties
Should be suing the twitter user for Forging & Distributing fake document - there is no valid 1st Amendment argument supporting a criminal act like that
Not saying the court would agree with both arguments but at least that would be the correct way to approach the suit - IMO
Re: Re: Re: Wait,.. What?
Well, since he knew enough to know what her working space was, it would also seem to me that he would know she'd requested remote teaching and been denied.....thus he knew her circumstances. Maybe I'm wrong but he sounds to me like he suffers from rectal-cranial inversion so I'm going to continue thinking he knew and didn't care.