...hallucinated nobody mentally competent, ever.
Section 230 immunity hinges on the question of how much tech platforms are controlling editorial discretion. Are these people forums or are they exercising editorial controls that would make them publishers? I think there are very strong arguments that they’re exercising editorial control....hallucinated nobody mentally competent, ever.
...hallucinated nobody mentally competent, ever.
Literally an article of faith. "Porn is bad for you" comes not from any factual basis, but from some fundamentalist christian nutjob (though I repeat myself).
We get it, you're illiterate. There's no need for you to keep spamming that message.
That's not to say matty has ever been honest in his short comments, either; he hasn't.
the more words MM spends on something, the less likely it is be true.[Projects facts contrary to extensive evidence]
someone hasn’t been paying attention.You'll find them in the nearest mirror.
BDAC*
there is “growing evidence that social media and other tech platforms harm mental health and wellbeing.” We’ve pointed out repeatedly that the evidence is incredibly mixed, and there remains no serious research showing a causal link.From what I've seen so far, every "social media harms the youth!" "study" has been as rigorous as the average antivax study, for all the same grift-based reasons. Made by frauds looking to cash in on selling fear to the dumb sheep, like the BRAC that whines about Mike defending children from abusers like them.
It’s because it’s not correctly priced.[Hallucinates facts not in evidence]
Fair market value is what the market pays, not what the thief demands.
It's lile they can't comprehend the reality that traffic = monetary value because news sites have their own ads on their own sites that pay for more views. Only a lying piece of shit would deliberately misaracterize that as:
That feels like “paying in exposure”. Sure, exposure is good (especially from something as big as Facebook), but it’s not as good as actually getting paid properly.
rational basis is the proper standard...declares irrational court.
..is not what anyone literate would read.
"You benefit, therefore I deserve it!" is entitled greed, not merit.
The facts don't care about your feelings, fascist snowflake.
...hallucinated nobody mentally competent, ever.
The 5th circuit says, what no court of law does.
Delete yourself, bot.