"Facebook captures most of the value" the bad-faith troll continues to assert without evidence.
That feels like “paying in exposure”. Sure, exposure is good (especially from something as big as Facebook), but it’s not as good as actually getting paid properly....says nobody with the slightest comprehension of what the linking actually results in.
This is deranged.[Projects facts contrary to evidence]
Why should one company pay another company if the first company does something for free that directly benefits the first company?Not just that, but why should company A pay company B if company A does something for free that directly benefits company B?
Can you give an argument for why paying zero is the right price?Why don't you ask that question of your strawmam, as theu're the only one holding such a position here.
News agencies' "nobody should make money but us! stance comes from solely from the greed and entitlement of the degenerative brain disease known as copyright maximalism, nothing more.
Someone arguing honestly in good faith, the way Arianty has never done here, would not be denying the reality that the news agencies were not only being compensated fairly for links, but that the news sites got the greater benefit from the symbiotic arrangement, before link taxes corrupted it into a parasitic relationship. https://www.techdirt.com/2023/03/31/news-publishers-admit-they-get-value-from-search-traffic-even-as-they-demand-extra-compensation-for-it/ https://www.techdirt.com/2023/09/14/latest-data-canadian-media-needs-facebook-more-than-facebook-needs-canadian-media/
yes they do, as they’re doing now...hallucinated nobody mentally competent, ever.
...projects the troll deliberately lying that Facebook gives nothing of value to news sites.
Arianty: projects that everyone else is credulous. Also Arianty: swallows the "Facebook isn't paying what they should" corporate propaganda hook line amd sinker.
Translator note:
stan for FacebookIs trollese for "I have no reasoned arguments to make."
The amount of credulity here is insane.Physician, heal thyself.
Linking: both parties benefit, with smaller agencies benefitting more Link taxes: platforms lose money to Murdoch, as designed. Why pretend link taxes are a well-intentioned solution to a problem that existed?
Copyright is theft.
An enemy of the US controlling a Social media network is bad, mmm’kay?So you agree you shouldn't be supporting Republicans' illegal attempts to control social media as much as you do.
American Patriot and a Christian supremacistBack in the real world, those two terms are mutually exclusive.
...hallucinated nobody mentally competent, ever.
Bratty matty: * spams the same brain-dead bullshit 3 times in a row * Also bratty matty: "Spam filter wah wah!"
So you admit you're just deliberately lying.
Notice how all the trolls who whine about hallucinated "censorship" are all silent about this actual attempt at censorship.