You’d be cheering for them too, if not for the EDS.And you'd be fucking horrified if not for your general lack of intelligence, sense and reason.
I don't think you even know what you're talking about.
My guess is it'll be something along the lines of "He needs to be able to control payments to shut down slush funds/wasteful spending/corrupt people and organizations, bro!" Y'know, the usual refusal to accept reality.
Well, he literally has to argue that "moving funds" doesn't mean "removing funds" to make his point, so it's not a surprise that he's struggling to give straight answers.
I don’t really use “slurs”, just insult people for the most part."slur, noun (1) a: an insulting or disparaging remark or innuendo" I guess we now have it on record that you use slurs.
Josh Marshall’s reporting at TPM reveals something that I can already hear developers howling about, even through the internet: Elez isn’t just looking at the code — he’s pushing untested changes directly into production on a system that handles trillions in federal payments.This is why you don't use AI to program for you, kids! Elez clearly doesn't know that.
This is all completely lawful.You're not a lawyer and therefore not an expert on law, as per your own statement. So stop pretending to know what is or isn't lawful.
It literally is not, please pay attention.Back at you, dingus. If you move funds from an agency, meaning that it no longer has access to them, you have removed their funds. I know we've established your loose handle on the definitions of words in the past, but this supposed argument is so piss-poor, even from you, that I'm surprised you found the On-button on whatever device you're writing from.
USAID isn’t even going to EXIST past Friday.Then Trump will have broken the law again.
USAID was just an office established (by EO) to handle a certain batch of funds given (by a law) to the state dept.And Congress made it so the Executive Branch couldn't just dismantle it by EO again.
It grew, over time, into a horribly corrupt slush fund.A claim that has yet to be backed up with any credible information.
So Musk removing whatever he wants is fine, but Masnick hiding comments is cowardly. Glad we cleared up your hypocrisy.
The funding isn’t being removed, it’s just being moved to the main state dept.That's...removing it from the USAID. Which is illegal. How do you continually keep sounding dumber?!
Consider what we’re being asked to believe about Elon Musk. That he is simultaneously managing Tesla, a global automotive manufacturer facing fierce competition and complex production challenges. That he is overseeing SpaceX, a company conducting human spaceflight and handling critical national security contracts. That he is running X/Twitter through a tumultuous transformation affecting global discourse. That he is developing experimental brain implants at Neuralink under federal investigation. That he is competing in the most sophisticated artificial intelligence race in human history through xAI.You forgot one, Mr Brock: he's also competitively playing a video game where he has better gear than many people who stream the game for a living. /s
As has been explained to you so many times, that's called a spam filter.
Given that the systems were developed with public funds, we should all have access to the source code. There’s nothing sinister about that. It’s why we can emulate the Apollo Guidance Computer at home, for example.The difference being, of course, that a treasury computer system is infinitely more important to maintain control of than a guidance computer for an obsolete rocket.
No, that'd be the GOP at the moment.
Biden pardoned nearly his whole family and half of government for 14 years after taking 20 million in bribes.Citation needed.
“US Code”?!? It’s in the fuucken constituion, dumb@ss.Cite the clause, then.
That looks like "The Dancing Dragon" from A:TLA.
Yes, how childish of them to expect their content to not be arbitrarily removed with no explanation, and then reinstated, also with no explanation! How dare they!