Got a source on that?
Timothy Geigner writes “Also notably absent is any mention of the leading cause of death in children, which is lead poisoning.” (meaning shooting deaths). Possibly the reason it’s absent is because it’s a conspiracy theory from the professional anti-gun industry.If you have evidence stating otherwise, feel free to share it with the class instead of just going "nuh-uh!".
*until the event was over.
The article itself points out that the schedule and lunch menu isn't newsworthy in and of itself since it wasn't found until the event was offer. What is newsworthy, as the article also notes, is that this is yet another example of how inept the administration is when it comes to basic security.
Sure, though I found the runner-up funnier than the winner.
The best thing about Newsom's trolling is that right-wing media outlets are falling for it, and brightly displaying their own hypocrisy.
Back then, the activists tried to claim that the internet would come to an end unless the FCC was permitted to regulate it.No, that's just the strawman that right-wing dipshits like you perpetuated.
Upping the stakes from “the end of the internet” to “mass death and disability” won’t change anything. Public opinion, and the legal opinion of the court are such as they are nowadays because the activists torched their credibility.You're literally commenting on an article that highlights the effect of courts either bending the knee to Trump, being spineless or not giving a shit anymore.
Change the name or actually do the work to find what’s funny.Alternatively, get a different sense of humour or ignore this weekly post.
No, that's not what it means. It means that corporations only become concerned with copyright issues when there's money to be made, or rather, when there's money to be missed out on making.
… Why is anyone wasting time / extending the courtesy of treating it as a factual claim?I literally called him a liar. I'm very much treating it as the opposite of a factual claim.
The FBI is run by Trump appointees, and they still say that crime is down, despite Trump claiming the opposite. So why is it accurate when Democrats admit to low polling numbers, but not accurate when a literal law enforcement agency "admits" that crime is down?
That sounds like a line from Loaded Weapon.
This is precisely why Democrat and corporate media approval numbers are at multi-decade lows. Middle America no longer trusts the system.Hmm, interesting... So when "the system" says crime is down, you're skeptical, but when "the system" says Democrat approval numbers are also down, you instantly believe it. One would almost think you were biased, Koward.
Considering the size of Trump's ego, I have no doubt that he would change "God bless America" to "God bless me" if he could.
For starters, Scarborough isn't left-wing; he's independent. Secondly, even if they all agree that something needs to be done, the way Trump is doing it isn't it. You don't fix homelessness and crime by throwing federal troops at the problem until the "unwelcome" are gone. And thirdly, the available crime data indicate the crime is at a record-low. So no, you chronic liar, crime isn't "too high". That's just the excuse Trump is using to implement his fascist tactics.
Oh, fuck off with your whataboutery.
They're already welcome, it's called the GOP.
Surprisingly, work isn't an issue for him. He starred in 15 movies last year.
Dean Cain proudly announced joining ICE last week, at 59 years old. He's very much not in Kansas anymore.
How is the public being harmed by the misuse or misunderstanding of "conspiracy theory"? I have yet to meet someone who didn't know exactly what "conspiracy theory" meant.