Trump doesn't have supreme power(yet), and while dictators can certainly be elected, their elections tend to be complete shams. Trump's wasn't.
So I would agree with Thad that Trump isn't there yet, despite his best efforts.
Again, based on what source? None of the outlets I can find reporting on this make any mention of the Indian navy claiming that the frigate was unarmed.
And given that it had just come back from participating in a large naval training exercise, it also seems weird that it would be completely unarmed.
“Netflix’s proposed acquisition of Warner Brothers raised serious antitrust concerns. When a massive streaming platform consolidates even more TV shows and movies behind a single paywall, American families lose. Walking away from this deal is a win for consumers.”
Even if this statement had included the word "Paramount", I don't think he could have put his hypocrisy any more on display than this.
Movies used to have have legs. They would run for months in theatres before coming out on video.
Today the new movies go from theatres to one more postage stamp on your netflix menu within weeks.
Post-theatre distribution also used to be a much more expensive process, so the distributors might as well let them run as long as possible.
But just because a movie gets a theatre release doesn't automatically "give it legs". Most movies released fail to make a profit.
And inversely, there are a lot of cult classics that didn't see much success before releasing on home video.
Under 230, even the platform, acting as a publisher is exempt from lawsuits for promoting that accusation, even when it’s technology produced it. That should be changed.
Anthony v. Yahoo! Inc already established precedence for something like this in 2006. Yahoo generated fake dating profiles to entice users to re-subscribe to the dating service. A user sued, Yahoo tried to have the suit dismissed on Section 230 grounds and were denied, because:
CDA § 230 does not apply to content that an interactive service provider "developed or created entirely by itself."
So Section 230 doesn't need to be changed to facilitate that scenario.
Apple said the app violated its guidelines about “targeted groups” (without an detailed explanation, as always, but isn’t forced to do so thanks to the First Amendment), since the app kept added new content about a specific group (ICE) because of the great popularity of the app once on App Store.
Potential suicides don’t disclose suicidal intentions because they’re afraid that if they do they risk lockup in a psychiatric ward, confinement in or out of a strait jacket, or electroshock.
How would you know what every potentially suicidal psychiatric patient thinks?
Trump doesn't have supreme power(yet), and while dictators can certainly be elected, their elections tend to be complete shams. Trump's wasn't. So I would agree with Thad that Trump isn't there yet, despite his best efforts.
Do you have a link? Even in an opinion piece by Sibal published today, he doesn't make any mention of the frigate being unarmed.
Again, based on what source? None of the outlets I can find reporting on this make any mention of the Indian navy claiming that the frigate was unarmed. And given that it had just come back from participating in a large naval training exercise, it also seems weird that it would be completely unarmed.
The ship was a frigate from the Iranian navy. Where are you seeing that it was unarmed?
People with integrity are ballsy. The GOP is arrogant.
Tell that to Brendan Carr, because he's the one who doesn't seem to know what the "Equal Time" rule means.
Aw man, he only threatened to make them testify under oath?
I doubt they're playing that kind of 4D chess. They just didn't want to pay more than what was justifiable to their shareholders.
Provide some evidence, any evidence, that this outbreak was caused by illegal immigrants.
Except it is.
It's getting increasingly stupid how accurate "Every accusation is a confession" is with the right wing.
Which is weird because they have plenty of money and no chance of losing.