The point isn't whether there is or isn't GenAI content in the final game, it's that Kotaku decided to call it GenAI slop with no evidence of what GenAI has even been used for in the development process.
Maybe ICE officers shouldn't be actually killing people, then.
The disclosure says that "all finished content in the final product is human-crafted", so Kotaku suggesting that "GenAI slop" is going to be in the game is still a conclusion without evidence.
You have never done this. You’re just upset that WB is going to the people who agree with you slightly less.So does the Ellison family pay you by the hour, or...?
If you think that's crazy, it's going to drive you up the wall that AI has been used to create treatment plans for colon cancer patients in my country. OOoooOOOoooOOO!
I can see there being differences on an individual level. But I don’t really see reasons why it would vary much from school to school?Not all schools have the same phone-related problems, and some schools already have their own policies that aren't outright bans.
Well, certain laws.
It’s not really unregulated. There are all kinds of laws.Name five laws that regulate data broker location data.
...said the pot to the kettle.
This article reminds me of what is now a somewhat old CGP Grey video about how AI will eventually be able to be used as a personal tutor: https://youtu.be/7vsCAM17O-M?si=3IVaHhPEBH7rPYyg
I disagree completely that safety and user engagement are linked. User engagement will increase if people become more and more dependent on the model for advice, emotional support, companionship,A product that becomes increasingly inferior will drive away users, and lacking safety measures is one way that that could happen.
Do you have an example of someone from the TD team suggesting that chatbots can't cause harm?
Can we trust AI companies to prioritize safety over increased user engagement?One is pretty closely linked with the other, so companies have a vested interest in keeping safety at a certain level if they want continued user engagement.
Well, he seems to kill people or ruin deals wherever he goes, so I'm not sure it would be a good idea for him to be in charge of the entire country.
Democrats started the KKKCitation needed.
So sure, he won the election—but besides your parasocial bragging rights and your perceived social sanction to openly use an ableist slur (the use of which makes you sound about as intelligent as people who use racial slurs), what have you actually gotten out of his victory?He got to own the libs. That's all the cultists need.
The problem isn’t with people being rich, it’s with using money as a punishment.Maybe if monetary punishment actually scaled with income for private citizens, like it sometimes does with company fines, the rich wouldn't be as eager to think they would get away with the crime.
There's certainly no evidence that he listens to people who know what they're talking about.
According to the letter itself:
In the event that you fail to comply with this demand or any part of its lawful scope, the Stockholders will seek judicial redress, including attorney’s fees.
Correction: the current government can't do anything well.