Florida? Florida?
Deputy Forbert: His tag lights were out. I mean dim! Umm... kinda a little dim? Definitely dim. OK, they were fine, but, errr... His passenger wasn't wearing a seatbelt? Yeah! Not wearing a seatbelt. Probably. I mean, maybe, maybe not, I couldn't tell 'til after the stop, but, umm, yeah.
Judge [to court stenographer]: Let the transcript reflect the fact that I've facepalmed my way to major cranial trauma... And please call 911 when you get a chance, thanks.
The Court notes that the domestic courts extensively explained why they considered that the applicant’s statements had been capable of arousing justified indignation, namely that they had not been made in an objective manner aiming at contributing to a debate of public interest
This decision doesn't seem all that bad, and really shouldn't affect many people: after all, most discussions of a religious nature I've ever read or heard have all been quite objective and contributed greatly to public harmony.
As far as I’m concerned, despite his lack of articulation, he’s doing a fantastic job. I can't go so far as to say "fantastic", but I gotta agree that Trump's doing a pretty good job. After all, he hasn't vivisected any kittens during a televised press conference, which means he's doing better than I expected.
Fuck ggl ... satellites they put into space. fuck them. Is anyone else picturing G'gl exploring the universe, indexing galaxies, and returning to Earth in 250 years to eradicate biological infestations and merge with the Creator?
He’s our only hope for any kind of justice for Jamal Khashoggi. It's like a hundred years' worth of global irony reserves got used up to craft a single sentence.
We are told that the only thing we can do is "fix any violations." But they won't tell us what the "violations" are... If reviewers don't have the time to (at minimum) C&P the flag-inducing content, the content shouldn't be flagged... or Google shouldn't even be bothering with the "human" part of the process in the first place.
I am also to be doubt TD's integrities, and my specific is most assuredly not to be use what oddly seems an online translate.
If it hadn't been for his own cameras, it would have been Talley's word against the Little Rock PD's.
Interesting new take on the "surveillance state", in that it's looking like we might have to record everything we do ourselves, just to avoid being framed by the police.
Please submit your FOIA request as a nested JSON object, structured to include:
Note: all DHS files and records are stored in encrypted form for security purposes, and only ciphertext will be searched. Should you require a plaintext search, simply submit our private key to us.
Since there was so much confusion over it all, we held off on writing about it, figuring more information would come out in the days and weeks after the initial story.
I noticed that, and had to follow the story over at Ars. On a completely unrelated note, has anyone ever had to get a latte at a strip-mall Starbucks because their local coffee shop's espresso machine was on the fritz?
https://www.forfeiture.ms.gov/ ...the Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of this site, and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in the contents of this site. (Boilerplate, but sad & funny nonetheless.) Names appearing on this website are presumed innocent. (Their property, however, is presumed to be guilty as sin.)
I wasn't intending to make Bai Tongdong out to be a moron -- far from it. Nemo's comment below does a much better job stating what I was clumsily hinting at, although I was going after utilitarianism in more general way. As a side note, pragmatism and utilitarianism (and formalism) seem to be well suited to the practice of law, and Prof Bai's lectures probably are very interesting -- I just don't think the same principles should be applied to government and politics in the same way or to the same degree. After all, look at how many lawyers the US elects to Congress, and how well that keeps working out for us ;)
Reverse lobotomies are a thing, right?
anyone posting "A great reckoning is coming" has lost ANY AND ALL potential sympathy on my part ... that DOES sound like a threat. Time to round up the clergy.
In the world we live in though, the practical motto should be “do the lesser evil”. For, after all, a morally compromised Google is still better than Baidu.
A utilitarian pragmatist philosophy professor who recommends that multinational corporations capitulate to the demands of totalitarian governments because "meh better'n nuthin'"... I would kill to be able to sit in on one of this guy's NYU law courses.
I said, ‘You know, you’re right, I never thought about that.’ I said, ‘You know, I have to start thinking about that.’
For once, I both believe him and agree with him.
I've got $20 that says this is the first Marxist Hoyt Axton comment ever made on TD.
“The body-worn camera is just a tool, it’s not perfect," Rallings said.
Is he actually trying to lump "forgot to turn the camera on in the heat of the moment" and "intentionally turned the camera off while pursuing a suspect" into the same category of user error, here?