especially screenings and psychological evaluations to find signs of aggressive, bullying, authoritarian mindsets in recruits They already do that. and then not hire them Oh :)
Or more generally, they're redefining the internet as a broadcast medium controlled by a few giant publishers.
Not only the same Sheriff's Department, it seems that it's the same assistant public defender (Scott Sanders) who helped reveal the snitch scandal digging into this one as well. It actually looks like the SD started "accidentally" listening to client/attorney recordings right after they lost their snitches. https://voiceofoc.org/2018/10/sheriff-and-phone-company-covered-up-jail-recordings-attorney-alleges/
This is well established in existing caselaw ... it is rarely brought up in articles about these subjects because it is such common knowledge. Maybe so, but do you have knowledge of an existing case in common law?
A clear violation of the "lysdexic in a hurry" rule. Somebody should be suing somebody.
While there are certainly people who have mental illnesses that should prevent them from owning a firearm, you're painting with a discriminatory broad brush here. Cardinal Richelieu could condemn any of us with six lines and a copy of the DSM-5.
the original post here cites a fictional "novel" as foundational 'evidence' in understanding the real world. If someone were to cite a "comment" as foundational 'evidence' in understanding the concept of concrete thinking, it wouldn't actually mean that someone's head was filled with portland cement and gravel.
It's also possible that the Satanic Temple offered their services to Netflix as consultants and were turned down. And hurt and offended, they retaliated with a lawsuit. It seems unlikely that a non-theistic group of political activists -- who promote critical thinking and don't believe in the supernatural -- would offer their services to the makers of a fantasy-horror entertainment series. Anton LaVey ... used to claim that he was a consultant on [Rosemary's Baby], as well as playing the part of Satan Just an egotist lying for the sake of self promotion. I don't think he ever sued anyone for calling him on it, did he? the ADL offered it's services to Mel Gibson's film "The Passion" and after being declined, launched an international campaign against the movie, claiming it was anti-Semitic I'm pretty sure the Anti-Defamation League thought "The Passion" had a weirdly modern anti-Semitic subtext to it and suggested changes. When Gibson rejected the changes, they brought their concerns to the public's attention. Are you saying they only did that because he wouldn't pay them as consultants?
More generally, what is it about "businessmen" presidents that the place the most completely unqualified people in charge of anything? My word for the day is kakistocracy (new term to me, despite its apparent resurgence of usage since the 2000's); kinda feels like we've got one fueled by a strangely effective mix of fear, greed and negative selection.
From the Reuters article, it looks like it breaks down as follows:
We should use the same standard that determines whether a police officer can carry a gun. I just thought he meant that gun ownership should be allowed if you promise to only shoot unarmed black men, the mentally ill, and the poor.
Infringing on the 2nd Amendment rights of The People by infringing on their 1st Amendment rights. Maybe they think it works like a double negative.
8) polling stations in gated communities
This is... beautiful. It's like Blue & Chip got together, converted to Discordianism, and are now writing collaborative Poe-etry. Hail Eris!
40 years is just a blink in geological terms. I think the MPD was reasoning from the other end of the scale: once the consent decree had been in effect for 18 years, they they thought they could stop worrying about it.
What would we call 'failure to surveil yourself'? I vote for preemptive spoliation.
Good point, it doesn't seem terribly useful for state AGs... followthemoney.org (the National Institute on Money in State Politics) looks like it might have more info in some cases, but it's still patchy and the data isn't presented as well. (In any event, I gotta admit that I was just taking a cheap & easy shot by equating corporate contributions with candidates' positions.)
Easy enough to find where a candidate stands on any given issue in a matter of seconds right here.
In protest, I've stopped following Florida Man on twitter.
Help us, Texas Man. You're our only hope!
Re: Re: Verify your vote?
All American voters are very proud of their specific votes ... or they wouldn't vote (right?) I'd definitely avoid participating in elections if my vote was available to the winner or those working in the law enforcement and justice systems... or even my employer, for that matter. The American Founding Fathers would be appalled They would most assuredly kick my cowardly (but free & employed) ass :)