And the idea that BRIAN RIEDL is a “RINO” is so F#cking stupid. He is a huge name in GOP/conservative circles.So THAT's a lie. Pretty sure I read a LOT more conservative press than you do. He's a relative nobody who works at the Manhattan institute. Also (I looked him up) he worked on the Romney campaign. That is about as definitionally "RINO" as you can get
.....you think conservative think tanks are responsible for a hugely bloated government, and foreign aid grift that goes almost exclusively to far lefty NGOs? Lol, rofl.
Koby, I literally exposed how that was absolutely, 100% false yesterday in an article you claimed to have read and commented on.No, you just lied about it. You are not a credible source, stop pretending your own articles are a credible source.
It's just meaningless and you sound like an idiot.
HOW do you not understand the difference between "contractor" and "employee". How could you possibly be that stupid?
Oh, well, it's really good to know that Business Insider overrides the constitution. Pssst, most journalists are m0rons. Biased, partisan hacks, but also mor0ns. That is not how ANY of that works.
I don't what to tell you, government contractors exist. No, everytime they tell someone to "shut up" that's not government telling them to. This entire article is made-up nonsense, MM has no idea what he's talking about.
Liberals are all the most hateful people I know, by far.
Then you will be removed from the offices by force, by security guards, as was Phyllis Fong. These orders are lawful. It really doesn't matter if you agree.
If you had an argument you would provide a citation, but you didn't.
You can argue contractors are government employees but they are definitely not "officials". Buddy, "official" is something laid out in the fffing constitution. It means a very specific thing.
You keep on saying all these words as if you think they mean something. They do not. Not a government official. You can WANT him to be to make your fever dream of some supposed "wrong" he did come true, but they have no legal legitimacy whatsoever. You can be a government official as per the appointments clause. THAT'S IT. He is not. This is literally why one of Jack Smith's cases against Trump fell apart. Not actually a prosecutor (an official position).
I'm pretty giddy, tbh. A little fat. My dick is fine, k'thx.
NONE of what you just said is true. It doesn't matter if you thought Trump said it, or even if he actually said it, it's not true. It CANNOT be true, as per the appointments clause. Musk can be, however, a government contractor with a security clearance, legally doing everything he's doing.
Buddy, DO YOU KNOW WHAT A GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR IS? Trump can say whatever he wants, he literally is not an "official" because the appointments clause says he is not. He can however have a security clearance and do everything he is doing. These are legal definitions that matter. "blah blah Trumps said", doesn't matter, do not care. And again, MM is not a lawyer, knows very little about the law and apparently nothing about the constitution.
You know NOTHING about security clearances,Apparently more than you, because I know that the president can, without question, declassify anyone as well as give clearance to anyone. reeeeeeetaaaaaarrrd
Oh? WHich ones? Which "Checks and balances" say Trump (and by extension Musk) can't do this? Absolutely fuuuucking none, that's what.
Actually, the ability of the legislative branch ("laws") to control the executive branch is pretty limited. Part of that "checks and balances". Each branch has their powers. Everything that has been done is completely within the executive branch and btw, completely legal. Your ignorance is not an argument.
Obviously I didn't write this, but...yes, that actually seems to be their argument.
"I'm rubber you're glue" is a hell of a burn.