But it's ok when big corporations do it!
It's just not ok when the government does it!
Because you know, it's always a big bad evil government who's the villain in dys-utopian futures!
German has flags still? I read that the German flag, and German national anthems are rarely ever seen in Germany after Hitler (who made heavy use of nationalism to brainwash the populace).
What if famous people decided to use this logic to hide their faces from the public?
Want to show a picture of Abraham Lincoln? Sorry, but even though photographs of him are all in the public domain, your copies of the picture are not. You have to go to a historical society or a museum to see how Lincoln looked like.
Oh, and while we're at it, we really don't like it how these history books are describing Lincoln as a very tall guy. It's injuring the intellectual property of those Lincoln photographs by telling people what Lincoln looked like!
Just to add, I think it's the picture in the story that's cutting off the text. Part of the picture is cut off for me as well by the right sidebar.
I can't read some of the text on the right side of the story, it's cut off the right sidebar. This is the only techdirt story it's an issue for, please fix. :(
Silly Gorshkov, terrorists are only 'scary' looking foreigners.
If a domestic citizen does something bad, then it's not terrorism! They're just some poor person in need of mental healthcare.
It's ironic Pai and Johnson said this, when in fact it's anti-Net Neutrality forces who's side amount to just a slogan (killing Net Neutrality) that's in search of a problem.
I saw a list that had 14 signs of Fascism, the 14th sign (not listed there) was fraudulent elections (or even not having elections at all).
But those executives worked extra hard for those gigantic bonuses while driving their company into bankruptcy!
It's not easy to drive yourself into bankruptcy while you have a near monopoly on the market! That's why they should be rewarded for their innovation by keeping their giant bonuses!
Reading around Reddit and elsewhere, I wonder if this day of action will get expanded to boycott some large web/tech companies that flipped on the issue to opposing net neutrality.
The most obvious target being Netflix, because of their CEO's speech about Net Neutrality, and how they look like hypocrites now. I've seen a number of people at reddit talking about canceling their netflix subscriptions over it.
GoDaddy backed down from their SOPA backing from a scheduled day to leave GoDaddy, the same could happen to NetFlix and potentially other tech/web companies.
On top of that, there's the arbitration clause, which will ensure users have as little leverage as possible should they be unhappy with Ancestry's services or handling of DNA data. This, too, is sadly a part of too many terms of service agreements. Arbitration forces users to play on the company's playground, rather than the more neutral field created by filing a civil complaint.
Arbitration clauses should be illegal.
The case where one cell phone company advertised 'free' phones and then charged people $36 dollars in 'taxes & fees' on that 'free' phone shows just how easy it is to abuse this crap. Their arbitration clause, and another clause banning customers from entering in a class action lawsuit against them let them get away with it, thanks to the idiots on the supreme court who sided with them.
I doubt Winner trusted Wikileaks to even report on this.
Wikileaks has been accused of being in Russia's pockets for over a year, and they've clearly been in Trump's pocket for ages. That doesn't sound like the kind of a person to leak something damaging to both to.
Wikileaks burned a lot of their credibly to half the country in the election.
Sorry the DRM won't permit you to do as you please with your arse. Otherwise everyone would pirate their arses instead of buying it from the arse manufacturer.
But... but... without a patent Ford would have had no motivation to invent a slightly different shape of a windshield to install in their cars!
We have to reward them with a vague patent that applies to all windshields made in the last century, otherwise no one will have any motivation to innovate anymore!
Not to mention the police and other bad guys violating your rights can force you to unlock your bio-metrics/iris stuff pretty easily.
Passwords however can't be stolen so easily.
I bet odds are good the FCC would work hard to find the author of such a bot and refer it to the justice department for prosecution for committing fraud.
There's little doubt that the bot spamming FCC is violating the law and could be prosecuted under something for it (not just CFAA).
That was what I was thinking.
Is it a 'hate crime' under this bill if you start a fire by mistake in your kitchen and a fireman kills themselves trying to put it out?
If arson a hate crime if it kills a fireman, even though the arsonist just intended to kill the person sleeping in the building they set on fire?
Do not let your voices go unheard as Net Neutrality advocates slowly, but surely, seek to drag the U.S. economy toward socialism.
Yes O'Rielly, socialism is always bad.
Except for things like Social Security, Medicare, anti-monopoly laws, the public education system guaranteeing free education to all kids, the fire departments, the police departments, the justice system, etc.
Them and all those other things that are paid for tax payer expense are just fine despite being a socialist redistribution of wealth in some way!
But the very idea of net neutrality is horrible, because socialism is BAD! BAD! BAD!
Not to mention Facebook has been in decline for years, with the decline starting in the US, where they have a net negative account 'growth' due to old users deleting their accounts.
Only a fool ties themselves to a company that's been in decline for years and is no showing no signs of reversing that decline thanks to increased competition.
Re: 1st vs. 4th Amendment
Courts do this in cycles.
For decades the courts had no problem blatantly ignoring the 14th amendment and it's equal protections clauses right after it was ratified.