Frontier Fires State Senate Leader (Who Also Worked For Frontier) For Supporting Attempts To Improve Broadband Competition

from the fighting-broadband-competition-at-any-cost dept

If you want to see what the US broadband sector really looks like, you should take a look at West Virginia — a state where regional incumbent Frontier Communications holds so much sway over the state legislature, efforts to improve connectivity in the state have spent a decade in the gutter. Local Charleston Gazette reporter Eric Eyre has quietly done an amazing job the last few years chronicling West Virginia’s immense broadband dysfunction, from the State’s use of broadband stimulus subsidies on unused, overpowered routers and overpaid, redundant consultants, to state leaders’ attempts to bury reports highlighting how a cozy relationship with companies like Frontier, Verizon and Cisco has led to what can only be explained as systemic, statewide fraud on the taxpayer dime.

But things haven’t been going all that well for Frontier lately. Frustrated customers are leaving in droves (assuming they have the option) after the company bungled an acquisition of Verizon’s unwanted DSL customers in Florida, Texas and California. It’s also now saddled with debt from that deal, which prioritized growing bigger over commen sense. And employees say morale at the company is at an “all time low” after executives slashed all bonuses and merit pay increases — but only for lower-level employees.

There’s some indication that these problems are loosening the telco’s traditionally iron grip on the West Virginia legislature. House Bill 3093, recently signed into law by West Virginia Governor Jim Justice, aims to improve broadband competition in the state through a combination of utility pole reform, and efforts to encourage local broadband community co-ops. Since it would have boosted competition in the state, Frontier obviously lobbied against the measure, hoping to keep its geographical fiefdom intact. It failed.

Eyre at the Gazette now notes that Frontier has responded by firing a six-year company executive and West Virginia Senate President (yes, at the same time) Mitch Carmichael for voting in favor of the measure.

So you should get a sense of what things are like in West Virginia just by the fact that Carmichael was deciding major state telecom issues while being a full-time employee of Frontier Communications. And Carmichael had been deciding on telecom-related issues for years with nobody apparently thinking that his recusal from some of these issues might just be a good idea.

This is so crazy that we should repeat it just so it sinks in: Carmichael was both a full-time employee of Frontier while also being the President of the state Senate, and constantly pushing for policies that favored his employer. And few, if any, state leaders apparently thought this was a problem. And it has been: Carmichael has long been an opponent of community run, municipal broadband, and had also recently voted down an effort that would have created a statewide broadband internet network, one that would have dramatically impacted Frontier’s business interests.

Carmichael had just gotten a raise as well after almost being lured away by a Frontier competitor, so the firing surprised him. Carmichael says he also refused to sign an NDA demanded of him by the company to prevent him talking about his termination:

“Frontier Communications has laid off West Virginia Senate President Mitch Carmichael, a six-year Frontier executive who noted Monday that his dismissal follows his refusal to torpedo a broadband internet expansion bill that the company vigorously opposed…Carmichael said Frontier has asked him to sign a “nondisclosure” agreement that would prohibit him from talking about his dismissal. He said he refused to sign it. As senate president, Carmichael was Frontier’s most powerful ally in the Legislature.

Apparently, public annoyance at Frontier and the sorry state of broadband in the state (West Virginia is not-coincidentally ranked 45th in broadband connectivity) forced Carmichael to actually do the right thing:

“The one thing I’m not going to do here as Senate president is advance special interests,” Carmichael said. “It was obvious the body [Legislature] wanted that bill, and I wasn’t going to stand in the way of it.”…”This was not something I wanted at all,” he said. “They had a bad year, from a legislative perspective. They severed ties from me.”

To be clear, Carmichael had been willing to “advance special interests” previously, but Frontier’s financial footing is so shaky — and public annoyance at a lack of broadband competition was so severe — he was forced to actually listen to what the public wanted. Now, courtesy of Frontier’s waning influence, new West Virginia law allows 20 families or businesses to form nonprofit co-ops in areas shunned by traditional ISPs. The bill also authorizes up to three cities or counties to band together and build broadband networks in areas incumbents like Frontier have long refused to.

Meanwhile there are growing indications that Frontier, a company that has made a career out of trying to prevent real broadband competition in its territories at any cost, may at some point be looking at bankruptcy sometime in the next few years.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: frontier

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Frontier Fires State Senate Leader (Who Also Worked For Frontier) For Supporting Attempts To Improve Broadband Competition”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anon says:

Two Things

First of all, it’s not just he was an employee – he was an *executive* level employee. Someone should have called conflict of interest.

Second – I sure hope retribution came *only after* the vote, no suggestions from his boss(es) beforehand. Any suggestion “you keep your job if you vote this way” would be interpreted as a bribe – paycheque only if you vote the way we want.

Bruce C. says:

Re: Two Things

To be fair, many states pay their legislatures only as part-timers, so state senators and representatives need a second job to make ends meet.

Frankly, it’s fascinating to me that Sen. Carmichael actually voted for the bill. It’s hard to argue a conflict of interest when the politician in question actually voted against his personal interest.

Gorshkov (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Unbelievable he was working for the isp and the legislature overseeing it.

I don’t disagree with you, but I’m curious – how else do you expect it to be when a position in the state senate is not a full time job?

Starting senators make $16,000, and the highest paid makes $55,000.

Bottom line: There is not a single senator in the state who is NOT going to be in a conflict of interest from time to time.

Anonymous Coward says:

Here I am again. This is why I keep saying that pro-regulation stance between government and economy will only work against you.

Here is more proof that Free-Market principles need a lot of air. We only need anti-monopoly and anti-trust regulations, which we actually do have, but they do not enforce them because not enforcing them gets you folks to support MORE regulation, which means more money for those coffers in the form of “campaign” donations, assorted kickbacks, deals, jobs for family members, and general power and legacy building.

You all have feet with huge holes in them from where you keep shooting yourselves!

Chip says:

Re: Re: Re:3 Re:


I told you all that elections exist and sometimes a different person gets elected and does things you don’t like! WHY won’t you acknowledge my obvious brillaince in contributing a deep and isnghtful contribution to eth confersaiton? It is because you are STUPID! That is why! Stupid stupid stupid! Recognize my genius in TELLING YOU AL SO!

Every nation eats the Paint chips it Deserves!

Anonymous Coward says:

"Refused to" build

The bill also authorizes up to three cities or counties to band together and build broadband networks in areas incumbents like Frontier have long refused to.

The obvious thing for Frontier to do is agree to build a network, to prevent the cities from doing that… and then just not build what they promised. I hope the actual wording of the law doesn’t leave this loophole. Telcos break promises all the time with little or no punishment.

Lawrence D’Oliveiro says:

A “Gresham’s Law” Of Political (In)Competence?

Peculiar how in the US, the venal and self-serving politicians manage to survive longer than the ones who demonstrate some actual personal integrity.

I don’t think it happens to quite the same extent elsewhere in the world of democratic nations. Why not? Perhaps because they manage to avoid politicizing the very institutions on which democracy is based–like the voting system and electoral boundaries.

Andrew D. Todd (user link) says:

Frontier Was Set Up To Go Bankrupt

The point is, Frontier, like the other Reverse Morris Trust companies, was set up to go bankrupt. The predecessor companies, Verizon and AT&T, retained the cellphone business, they put as high as possible a valuation on the land-line business, they took out as much cash as possible, and as much interest-bearing notes as possible, and left the remaining business as highly leveraged as possible. In northern New England, they misjudged the business with Fairpoint, and Fairpoint didn’t last for “a decent interval,” to use the phrase about the Vietnam War, a chance to get out of sight before the inevitable collapse came. Frontier has lasted a decent interval, and the money has all been “laundered.” South Vietnam lasted two years after the peace treaty (1973-75). By that time, American soldiers had been pulled back far enough that it was logistically impossible for them to do anything when the communists attacked. Frontier’s main purchase of Verizon lines was seven years ago. A decent interval indeed!

Cellphones, WiFi, and other forms of wireless are winning. They don’t have to maintain continuous branch lines. A repeater or a router every couple of hundred feet is plenty. The local electric company sent out a price-sheet, including not only prices per kilowatt-hour, but monthly all-inclusive prices for outdoor lighting. If you need a street-light, it’s about ten or twenty dollars a month, depending on circumstances. That is the point to which, via Moore’s Law, the price of a relay or router is converging. The Reverse Morris Trust companies were so pre-occupied with trying to manage their debt that they didn’t look very hard at reasonably inexpensive measures such as fiber-to-the-neighborhood.

As one might expect, the rats are leaving the sinking ship.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...