Cool comment, Scooter. Please point out where I've been either pro Marxist or pro groomer. I'll wait....
"The chart doesn’t tell you by how much that number has increased over last year or the year before (hey, this year’s line was hungry, and ate those lines!)." WTF are you talking about? There are several years represented on that graph and you can see how 2023 is at the top of all of them. What am I missing? "Are police, on average, more lethal? Are citizens, on average, more deserving of lethal responses? The data doesn’t tell us those things." Did you never learn about context clues in school? Homicides are down and police killings are up. And you're asking if people are more worthy of being killed by police when violent crime is down? WHAT?!?!?!?
What in the actual hell are you talking about?
If every infringement is a lost sale, is every instance of someone losing what they bought like this a "stolen purchase"?
Thank you for this complete and total takedown of my hometown, sir :)
Not, in fact, a valuation. Which is one of the things Masnick just lied about. Hi. I wrote this article, not Mike. I'd like you to acknowledge that failure to pay attention to detail as a starting point before we get to your other claims, to see if this conversation is even worth having....
Of course not, because Twitter isn't talking as to why it was suspended, which leaves the press and public to speculate. And that speculation follows the most logical conclusion one can come to, with some circumstantial facts in evidence. If you have a competing theory with equal circumstantial facts in evidence, please do tell!
Blech good catch. Working on correcting the headline....
I'll admit the comments here, mostly, are quite helpful and that I won't pretend to be a technical expert on upscaling technology. What I will commit to is digging into this a bit further and for sure if there is reason for a follow up post on this topic, I will write one. I typically have a decent deal of trust in outlets like IGN, but hey, I'm capable of missing the nuance on stuff, and I'm sure they are too. Thank you again to the commenters for the feedback.
Did any of those licensees turn their licensed products around and give them away for free?
I may have made this same prediction in our writing room discord chat :)
;)
Indeed I should. Meant to and ommitted it by mistake, but fixing that now.
This is the way.
Saw some of the same reviews. Which makes me very sad; I was looking forward to this title.
“Chipotle Burrito Bowl” - Can either of you explain precisely which part of that menu item's name is NOT purely descriptive? If not, it's simply not trademark infringement. You cannot commit trademark infringement with a purely descriptive use of a word or term.
No.....but I would have if I'd thought of it.
Feels like an obvious case where they'd want it branded the "Mass Effect"....
Sure, but as I've discussed recently on this very site, Nintendo is the Disney of the video game industry....
To be clear...
This was entirely my error, folks, and I want to echo the apology from Mike above, if not make it more forcefully. I try to be much better about this in terms of scrutinizing source material and failed to do that in this case. Apologies to our awesome community!