Florida Man Wants $2 Million From Rockstar Over Parody Appearance In GTA6 Trailer
from the and-here-we-go dept
The folks behind the Grand Theft Auto franchise are certainly no strangers to lawsuits and complaints over publicity rights issues. GTA5 famously found the publishers of the game in court defending itself against the likes of Lindsay Lohan and Karen Gravano, ultimately winning both cases. Anyone familiar with the GTA franchise will have a sense of what is going on here. The series makes a regular habit of creating parodies of whatever is in the pop culture lexicon at the time of the game, with nods, but not faithful recreations, towards real life personas. In fact, most often, GTA will take multiple cultural references and mash them together as parody and off-color commentary on whatever it is parodying. All of that, of course, is speech protected by the First Amendment.
Rockstar’s latest iteration of its opus franchise is due to come out soon. A trailer for the game was released recently, showing off some impressive visuals within the game, as well as several examples of the exact cultural references described above. One of those was a nod to an individual known as the “Florida Joker,” who began making noise on social media about wanting to be paid millions of dollars as a result of the homage.
A Florida man is calling on Rockstar Games to pay him $2 million for showing literally one second of a character who looks like him in the reveal trailer for Grand Theft Auto 6. Lawrence Sullivan, AKA “Florida Joker,” accused the studio of stealing his likeness in his latest TikTok video. But a Red Dead Redemption 2 voice actor wasn’t having it.
Sullivan, who got his face tattooed to resemble Jared Leto’s version of the Joker following the Batman villain’s appearance in 2016’s Suicide Squad, has been trying to monetize his recent flicker in the limelight. “Let’s talk,” he said in a public call to Rockstar after parodies of him and other viral social media figures appeared in GTA 6’s long-awaited first trailer.
This is extremely unlikely to go anywhere. As in the previous cases, what Rockstar is doing here is purely parodying a pop culture figure. What it is not doing is creating a faithful reproduction of Sullivan. Just having your face tattooed as a skinny guy isn’t enough to qualify as reproducing the personage of an internet sensation. As in the Lohan and Gravano situations, there are obvious nods to Sullivan and several internet memes in which he is featured, but that is not all that the character in the game is, based on the trailer.
Parody is a thing and it is protected speech. Rockstar has established a reputation for itself in this game series in which it parodies the current culture as a method for commenting on it humorously. And, as voice actor Roger Clark noted, its lawyers have been well-attuned to what lines can be crossed and what cannot.
One person who seems to think Sullivan has no reason to complain is Roger Clark, the voice actor behind Red Dead Redemption 2’s protagonist, Arthur Morgan. “[Rockstar Games is] lawyered up, man,” he said in his own TikTok video, according to PC Gamer. “They know exactly what they can and cannot get away with. If I were you, I would use the notoriety they just threw your way to your advantage. Capitalize on it somehow. You ain’t getting a job at Home Depot with that face.”
Disparaging comments aside, Clark is exactly right. The lawyers will have already vetted the content of the game to make sure it won’t run afoul of accusations just like this. And, to add, Clark is spot on that Sullivan ought to be using the homage as a way to boost his own notoriety and, perhaps, ability to monetize his persona.
I wouldn’t expect a lawsuit to be filed in this case as a result of all of this, but I’ve been surprised in the past.
Filed Under: florida joker, grand theft auto, lawrence sullivan, parody, the joker, trailer
Companies: rockstar games


Comments on “Florida Man Wants $2 Million From Rockstar Over Parody Appearance In GTA6 Trailer”
But people who bring such suits always believe they have a new angle which will allow them to win where others have lost.
I also love how he says it’s “his” likeness, despite having ripped it off of a movie character.
Re:
Yep. Guy who has another party’s IP tattooed on his face wants money for his existence being acknowledged in another work ohhhh i see what his deal is.
Re: Copyrighted Tattoos
I’m surprised this wasn’t brought up in the article itself, especially given the other articles on this site for tattoo copyright….
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Missing the point
The lawsuit was filed only to publicize this clown, and Techdirt has obliged. Nice.
Re:
I agree. Techdirt is just so irresponsible here by giving this guy notoriety when everyone knows that no one would have ever heard of him if the story wasn’t featured in an article on Techdirt, well, notwithstanding coverage of the same story by much smaller media outlets like Fox News, Business Insider, USA Today, Forbes, The Guardian, and others you’ve probably never heard of…
For shame, Techdirt! How dare you, sir!
Re: If the first thing people think of when they hear your name is 'The idiot/liar/fraud?'...
Despite the saying not all publicity is good publicity, not being known is far preferable in most cases than people recognizing your name for all the wrong reasons.
Re:
You say that as if him getting publicity will be ultimately be beneficial to him…
Hahahahaha.
Yeah, sure.
Look, go make a parody of rockstar. I’m sure they will sue you into oblivion, while youtube,ect ban you and black list you at their behest.
They know the legality of it will NEVER matter because the person they made a “parody” of will never have the power to have a chance to hold them liable.
Re:
No, no… there are plenty of lawyers who see deep pockets like Take 2, but don’t have the 1st amendment practice experience not to take the “contingency fee” case.
Legalistic Darwinism.
Re:
Not sure why you make it sound like there’s something to hold them liable for. Like the article says, parody is protected speech.
Also, people have parodied Rockstar’s games for literally years with no legal repercussions.
“I wouldn’t expect a lawsuit to be filed in this case”
tilts his head to the side
The SWAT team is on the way…
That was a really good pick for a phrase you could tell your followers to let them know you were in danger.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
You're the anti-semite, right?
Protesting Israeli privacy invading software (fine, generally, though you seemed to have a singular focus) …..even when used to fight Hamas and find hostages (not fine, there is basically no tech that doesn’t run on baby souls that you could find fault with when used for that purpose)
You cried about new Israeli laws banning terrorist and hate speech…..which y’know I’m quote against actually, except that basically every other western democracy besides the US has similar laws (als quite against).
But you tend to focus on the Israelis, right? Except you didn’t maybe the last month…..did somebody finally talk to you? About your problem?
Re:
You should talk to someone about your problem with being a pathological liar.
Not only is your comment off-topic to the tenth power, but the content of it is so batshit nuts that you sound even more unhinged than usual.
Re: Re:
It’s kind of hilarious that someone would complain about not having anything to complain about and then just veer into batshit crazy territory. It got all the indications of someone who isn’t mentally stable.
Re: Re: Re:
“It got all the indications of someone who isn’t mentally stable.”
aka: GOP
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
You are not smart. Everytime I read a comment of yours I feel dumber.
Re: Re: Re:
So aside from being a pathological liar you must be dumb as a rock by this time.
Re:
The US and other nations have laws that criminalize to various degrees, producing and distributing such content
Isreal’s law criminalizes consumption of such content…
Few if any other western democracies have laws like that…
Re:
What in the actual hell are you talking about?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
Obviously, that string of bizarrely anti-Israel (and ONLY anti-Israel) articles he wrote.
Re: Re: Re:
Israeli doesn’t mean Jewish. Jewish doesn’t mean Israeli.
Re: Re: Re:
So you admit you are here to harass the site.
Re: Re: Re:
Who? The guy who didn’t write this article?
Re: Re:
I have learned to translate the very, very confused mind of Matthew Bennett.
So, first, Matthew is too stupid to know his Geigners from his Cushings.
Second, Matthew is too ignorant to understand that we have been criticizing dubious spyware companies for ages.
Third Matthew is too confused and ignorant to understand that criticizing Israeli companies is not even remotely anti-semitic (which is even more laughable, given that he lost his shit when people pointed out that some of Elon’s statements were pretty clearly anti-semitic).
Fourth, as always, Matthew’s principles appear entirely derived from what most supports his personal preferences, such that calling Musk anti-semitic is not allowed without him directly spewing hatred for Jews. But, anyone he wants to criticize, can be called anti-Semitic for simply calling out sketchy Israeli spyware companies.
Fifth, Matthew is so infatuated with his own made up conspiracies that he is willing to discuss them on wholly unrelated articles, because he just can’t figure out how to reply properly.
I think that about covers it.
Matthew’s ability to get things just totally wrong continues to be his special power.
Re:
yeah
Lindsey Lohan already tried this with GTA5…and lost.
Rockstar will simply say something like: Any appearance, character, or likeness to any person(s) (alive or dead) is strictly fictional, and coincidental, and in no ways represents actual living person(s)… blah…blah…legalese.
I would like to propose a cataclysmic change to game exclusives though…
Any takers, Anyone???
Re:
Who wants to talk about game exclusives?
Someone? anyone?
Is this thing on?
Re: Re:
How this works is you just post your thoughts and see if anyone comments on them, rather than first securing an agreement to enter into a conversation.
Re: Re: Re:
No exlcusives
In the future, there will only be “timed exclusives”. There will then be plenty of time to optimize each 3rd party game, for each console and the PC market.
In my mind, it all works out…
Hear this analogy:
0 to 60 mph is the game.
In Porsche’s, 0 to 60 it optimized to take place in 3 secs. In Honda Civics, 0-60 is optimized to take place in 6 secs. You buy the one that you can afford.
Follow my imagination into the future:
GTA X is the game.
On the Sony console, it would be optimized for 120 fps with ray & path tracing at 8K.
On the Nintendo, it would be optimized for 60 fps using DLSS and 4k’ish performance–but it’s portable.
Your pick.
WELL…if the Sony version is always better, why buy the Ninty version: MODS would be allowed on consoles–>this could even the playing field. ALSO, console and game costs would vary. Costs is always a factor that would convince people to buy a less powerful console (ahem-Xbox Series S).
Imagine Nintendo licencing Mario to be developed by Insomniac, Naughty Dog, or Sucker Punch!
Imagine a Metroid/Spiderman machup developed in house by Nintendo!
Imagine both of these games available on every console and PC, after being optimized during the “time exclusive” window!
Both could happen if exclusives didn’t exist.
Florida Man, permanently marks himself in the distinctive appearance of a trademarked character then publically demands money from people for the use of his appearance…
If Warner Brothers notices, I doubt this will end well..
Re:
Perhaps Florida Joker is just trying to raise enough cash to get the damage fixed? I doubt that would be covered by any medical insurance he has.
No job at Home Depot, but you do get a complimentary room at Arkham Asylum for as long as you need it. (Watch out for the guy with orange hair… and skin… OK, anyone with orange anything.)
Get away with
Even Clark’s statement gives the Florida Joker’s case too much credit.
I don’t think Rock Star is getting away with anything at all, because they’re not doing anything wrong.
Re:
This is like those allegations that someone is clearly guilty of a crime because “they explicitly tried to make sure they stayed on the legal side of the law.”
Florida Man Finally Makes The Florida Meme Unfunny Using Copyright Maximalism
Re:
Personally, I’ve never particularly considered the meme funny to start with. Even the guy who started the meme realized that the meme has completely devolved into making fun of an entire state, and expressed regret at how mean-spirited the whole affair has become.
On the other hand, Florida continues to do all sorts of stupid shit that rationalize the label…
1