I hope we'll see affordable lawyers specializing defending against these trolls. Affordable because they need only put up a token, bare-minimum fight in these cases, enough to make the troll drop the case.
I know MULTIPLE people who just bought a new printer everytime the ink ran out because it was cheaper
That's why printers are now sold with cartridges that are only partially filled.
One of the major problems with the 'Collect it all, sort through it at our leisure' mindset that infects intel agencies is that when they actually do get important information it's almost certain to be drowned out by all the useless stuff.It means that one a terrorist emerges, the intel agencies can retroactively surveil them. Root through their phone, email and social media records and find out everyone they've been communicating with. Which lets them quickly round up the terrorist's support network and prevent future attacks. But it's too late to stop the initial attack even if there were signs and warnings that seem obvious in hindsight.
The Supreme Court is not impressed with the CAFC's pretzel logic and notes that it's pretty damn obvious that once you've sold a patented product, you've exhausted the right to pull back the license on that product and claim infringement:
Have shrink-wrap licenses ever held up in court?
If I purchase software or printer ink, take it home, tear open the packaging AND THEN find a license agreement, it's not just that the deal was already concluded before new license stipulations were presented. It's that there's no option to say 'no.' With the packaging opened, it can no longer be returned.
If Lexmark can add stipulations at this point, then the user should be allowed to do the same. "By allowing the cartridge to function, once installed, Lexmark agrees to provide the user with unlimited free ink refills or other materials of equal value by weight. Also bacon."
There should also be a recognition that international surveillance can go both ways.
There's a common theme with complaints by Americans about surveillance, drone strikes, kidnapping and torture programs and whatnot. (A June 2006 report from the Council of Europe estimated 100 people had been kidnapped by the CIA on EU territory.) That theme: It's all peachy-keen when they do it to foreigners, but HOW DARE THEY do it to Americans!
As always, turnabout is fair play. If the US finds it acceptable to spy on the leaders, companies and citizens of allied countries - and they do - then it's acceptable for even allied countries to spy on Americans.
I was referring to the "homeless, mental issues, gang members, turf wars" stuff. There's nothing new there, no increase. I agree with you about the police problem.
I'm not surprised by it though. Decade+ hostile occupations of cities two war zones - where any civilian was a potential combatant and had to be treated as such - could have no other effect. Take those soldiers and their lessons learned and drop them in large numbers into police forces back home, and suddenly your police seem a whole lot less friendly.
Handing them mountains of military weaponry at the same time - leading to SWAT raids targeting NON-violent offenders becoming common - hasn't helped.
Violent crime and robbery rates in the US have been dropping for decades. The same goes for police fatalities. Even the great 1950s were a myth for most people. Society was just better at sweeping the problems under the rug. Nice try though. Let others praise ancient times; I for one am glad I was born in these. - Ovid (43BC - AD18)
Did any of these studios release a file that was not either a reboot or a sequel?Of course! There's also derived works and adaptations. You know, like ancient folklore, The Brothers Grimm and Jules Verne - where they don't have to worry about others' copyrights. Or a couple Disney movies based on modern anime, where the lack of worry about others' copyrights was apparently based on having a massive legal budget.
Three delusional claims in just one sentence. Mom's basement is a center of efficiency.
Comcast Consumer Satisfaction Index* * Adjusted for Stockholm Syndrome.
(Adds popcorn to shopping list)
Will the encryption ban apply to online banking?
Apple was the name for a failed above-ground nuclear test in 1955. The primary failed, yielding much less than the predicted 40 kt. They later succeeded with Apple-2.
All it succeeded in doing was helping to irradiate millions of Americans and drive up cancer rates. As such, Comcast may indeed get higher satisfaction ratings from Americans.
But probably not.
It certainly raises some interesting questions.
Once legal, it's a lot easier to monetize "reverse malware" and hacking tools. Especially highly automated tools for small and medium companies who don't have hackers on staff.
So... Would Microsoft roll their "hack back" tools into Windows Defender ("The best defense is a good offense!"), or do they monetize them as a new component in Office 365?
/s
Second, there is still a laughably easy workaround for anyone that wants to keep seeing free articles from the Boston Globe without a subscription: simply delete all cookies from the Boston Globe off of your computer and, voila, you get more free articles.
My browsers are set to delete all cookies automatically when I close them. That's not to get free news; it's a basic privacy measure.
It means I have to enter my Techdirt credentials once or twice a day, but that's a small price to pay.
Does this legislation strictly define the "cyber attacks" that let companies go on the offensive?
Otherwise no doubt they'll adopt whatever definition suits them. Anything from perceived IP misuse to online criticism will no doubt be cited for "hacking back", just like it's routinely cited for DMCA takedown fraud and other unethical responses.
MP3 may not be dead, but it's obsolete.In related news: John Deere has announced that with the advent of their DRM-restricted tractors, owner-repairable tractors are now obsolete.
It's no wonder one of Obama's first acts as president was to pardon the culprits.Citation....? If they're not charged in the first place, he has no power to pardon them.
It can also mean "Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention. Thank you for taking a stand on it."
WITHOUT meaning "I have researched and confirmed your claim."