The root issue here isn't that the isp is blocking ads, but that they think they have the right to interfere with, and ultimately modify without consent, the flow of traffic between users.
There's little difference between them doing this and deciding they're going to start censoring anything they feel like.
Unless the wifi network is using a separate router you're still giving strangers access to your network hardware. Care to guess how easily the security on lease-grade routers can be cracked?
So, even if this were true am why am I having a hard time caring? Last I checked, despite what Russia desires, the Ukraine was a sovereign power that they were illegally attempting to annex.
Out of all those stories the one I find most interesting is the one about the actress stealing an audience member's phone. I'm not interested the act itself so much, but the fact that so many people in every forum I've seen the story discussed in can't wrap their heads around the idea that being rude with a phone doesn't give people the right to assault the phone user and steal their property.
Except for the part on the product description page that clearly states "Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited" on non-DRM ebooks...
Seriously, it takes 10 seconds max to scroll down the page and see the description.
So, given that YouTube was made aware of the threat and ignored it, why can't they be held liable as an accessory to murder if something happens to this guy as a result of their forced disclosure?
Let's not forget the part where, as part of he his ban, they're encouraging theatres to get the police involved with anyone they suspect of recording, as well as encouraging theatres to implement random bag and jacket checks to ensure compliance.
Sorry, but the moment some pimply-faced teen popcorn sweeper tells me they want me to open my jacket so they can do a security check is the moment I tell them off and walk out in full drama queen mode. They want to make my, expensive and rare, date night unpleasant. I'll skip the theatre and wait for the movie to come out on for sale. It's not like there aren't plenty of other things to do or vids to watch that don't violate my personal space or privacy rights.
And let me guess: if she gets Facebook to shut down HER page, as she's allowed to do per the terms of service, they'll charge her with obstruction.
Sorry to tell you, but both trans fats and unpasteurized foods are bad for you. Can you survive without pasteurization? Sure, but to act like you're not playing roulette every time you do is a fallacy.
As for the "global cooling, global warming" but... Sorry, but the science is pretty much completely decided on that one. The fact that politicians and industry lobbyists are trying to muddy the waters and keep the status quo around doesn't negate the fact that global warming is a reality.
They've got that covered with threatening to trash your credit rating if you do so.
We don't see an increased level of violence or sexual assault, no matter how much your tv news might convince you otherwise. Try again.
This doesn't surprise me, though I'm glad to see that some universities are starting to actually enforce open access rules. I spent ten years in these corporate world before returning to college to continue my education. Before I returned I picked up and extremely technical hobby and constantly ran up against institutional firewalls when trying to access even the most basic journal articles on techniques and research. Since returning to college? Not so much, because my university pays for the fees.
As a result I find myself hoarding articles that are even of remote interest to my hobby, because I know that as soon as I'm no longer a student I won't be able to afford to access them.
They say that the era of the independent scientist changing the world is over. What they don't say is that is, in large part, because they've been priced out of the conversation unless they have the backing of large business's or universities.
You honestly believe that? Tell me, does the rest of the world have the same sort of security theater as we do? My European friends say no, and they fly all the time. It's a miracle most of them aren't dead apparently.
"Who can help autistic children recover? What are the actual strategies that help autistic children recover?"Tell you what: bring peer-reviewed evidence to the table supporting a link between autism and vaccination and then we can talk.
You know, for something that's supposedly a "shadow of the original" the a EU sure does guy a lot of American cheese. I don't know about the rest of the nation but here in Wisconsin my local grocery store has an entire aisle devoted to just cheese, and the selection and quality is just as good as the best I ever experienced in Europe.
The EU is pretending to be a gaggle of cheese snobs to cover up for a blatant attempt to prop up their local cheese makers and harm their biggest competitor. It couldn't be more obvious.
When I was gifted a kindle I didn't think twice about purchasing ebooks, and I've since converted all of my book buying to electronic format. The difference? The very first thing I do when I buy a DRM'd book is download it to my computer, crack the encryption, and back it up. I don't share it, and it's strictly for my own personal use. Last I checked when I go to any of the ebook storefronts they all say "buy", not "license".
Textbooks are an insignificant fraction of total books purchased. There's no way a slight uptick in college attendance could allow my generation to overtake the Boomers in book consumption.
You, my friend, have just convinced me to find any means I can to put money towards this film and in Mr. Smith's pocket. Congratulations. Now crawl back under whatever rock you crawled out of, if you would.
So is this turning into a "turtles all the way down" scenario or something? I fail to see how having a Q&A screening is the same thing as DRM just because he didn't go out of his way to show it to as many people as possible.
How is it even a debatable issue that one-on-one interaction with a content creator is a scarce value service? Your argument is stretched beyond the realm of credibility, please pull it back before your brain falls out.
You know, I have yet to see a single source explain how a snippet tax is anything more than trying to charge people for talking about a news story and directing others who are interested to the original source. Apparently "on the internet" really does change everything.