They also didn't ban criminals from committing murder with this law either. I guess that means murder is legal now. That which is not prohibited (by the most recent law passed) is allowed!
I want to get off of Mr. Trump's Wild Ride.
If I could bring back one person from the dead it would be Charlie Kirk, just so I could force him to watch that dumpster fire. I'm not sure if he'd openly repudiate it, he sold his soul a long time ago after all, but deep inside I think he'd find it stomach churning. I think his inner private person would be horrified at what he helped wreak.
No, I'm pretty sure smashing machinery because it takes away jobs from manual laborers is anti-technology and anti-industrialization.
Can't wait to find out 1970s D&D was infringing on Nintendo's 2025 patents by allowing wizards to summon monsters to fight for them.
I don't think it's done for. The one saving grace we have going for us is that these people are all monumentally stupid incompetent morons who burn bridges like they breathe air. They got where they did by convincing a lot of people that they were competent truth tellers. They aren't smart enough to keep that lie going and aren't competent enough to hold onto the country they stole. Eventually, when the dumbasses who voted for him realize they've been taken for a ride (again!) the whole thing will fall apart. The house of cards is already coming apart. We're just in that torturous period between elections where there's no opportunity to vote them out yet. If (somehow) Trump (or his successor) holds onto power come 2028 then it will be time to hang up the hat.
Accusing the Trump administration of hypocrisy is a bit beyond shooting fish in a barrel. It's like shooting already dead fish on a table.
New flash: The Reaganites are not in charge anymore. SCOTUS did not "lose" Wilkinson. Trump and friends never had the Reagan wing of the GOP. The rise of Trumpism is a direct rejection of everything Reagan conservatism stood for, body and soul. Reagan and friends only ever LARPed about small government and fiscal discipline but at least they were solid about rule of law and opposition to socialism. The new kids aren't even LARPing anymore and they fucking love socialism. Not the cuddly college activist socialism, but the brown shirt goose stepping tankie socialism.
Neat, but if the military has to "allow" you to run the country I'd be really skeptical about how much power someone in that role would actually have. I could be totally wrong though. Maybe the military will effectively hand over the keys and do whatever the potential new government bids, but it would be a shocking first. The real test is going to come when the new government decides to change some heads at the top of the military.
Once is an "oops" (in normal times, a "you'll never work in this town again" oops). I can't wait for 3 years and 3 months from now when we'll start finding out how many top secret war plans were accidentally (or "accidentally") emailed straight to the Kremlin.
Is that so? Which laws are they breaking? Where have these so-called "activist judges" erred in their rulings? Surely, the Supreme Court could may real hay taking these rogues to task with detailed call outs and lengthy dissertations about the actual legal principles being ignored. If the bullshit is so easy to refute, why haven't they done it?
There is no Tolerance Paradox. Allowing bad speech doesn't "enable" bad acts. If that were the case then absolute intolerance of bad speech would prevent bad acts, but it categorically does not.
Whatever there is to be said about Charlie Kirk (the less, the better, IMPO) he was not violent. He was not a source of violence. He did not initiate violence against anyone. Could his ideas have inspired someone to violence? Maybe. But inspiration is not culpability. If violence is the only political answer that remains, then (in that case) it should only be directed at the actual source of violence. The American Revolution wasn't fought by butchering royalist authors.
Only the finest most terrificest people. Wonderful people. The best of the best.
"The Way to Stop Discrimination on the Basis of Race Is to Stop Discriminating on the Basis of Race." --John "SCOTUS Chief Justice" Roberts, Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 2007Oof. That aged like fine milk.
Quick. How many US troops/federal agents have been injured or killed by, oh let's be generous, anyone in a boat in the past... uh, how about fifty years?
Can't wait for the shadow docket reversal to spend more words admonishing the circuit court for not "reading the room" than explaining which parts of the law they apparently got so wrong.
I bet they were just saying "Boo Urns".
You can tell when you're doing something right when politicians get mad about it, personally.
It doesn't even have to be that. With a mere correlation (and an extremely loose one like this) you can end up really deep in the weeds trying to figure out whether it's a cohort problem. IANAD, but it might even turn out to be that women with those genetic factors linked to autism are also just predisposed to get miscellaneous unrelated pains and thus end up treating them with acetaminophen. IF that turned out to be the case, this is just pointless cruelty for no reason.