Isps can reign this in by charging a large fee pet request over 50. They can justify it by claiming anything beyond 50 a month costs them too much money to be economically viable. Yes it doesn't close the door but they can charge enough to make sure the m/riaa don't just throw stuff at them shotgun style.
Blow out a tire on a fleeing vehicle? What the hell kind of drones are they planning on using that can carry the weight of a weapon powerful enough to put down a suspect (shoot out a tire) and keep up with a car doing 50+mph? Are they going to have a Predator or Reaper circling around the incident zone with a stabilized gyro rifle mount, oh wait.. military surplus sold off cheap to law enforcement agencies says yes they will be.
"The Congressional Review Act was designed as a common-sense check on anti-consumer regulations like this, and we are pleased that Senator Flake, Congressman Blackburn, and their colleagues are using it to such positive effect. We strongly urge Congress to support and quickly act on these Joint Resolutions."
I guess their definition of "Consumer" can be found in the list of signatures at the bottom of the letter, as opposed to, you know, the public at large.
It is worse then what the article mentions. When have you ever heard of them scaling back a security measure? No laptops and tablets will be the norm from those countries till the heat death of the Universe.
They arrested Charles Wood, so I'm willing to bet they also impounded the car as an 'accessory' to the alleged drug trafficking. Which means he is going to have to jump through all kinds of hoops to get his car back.
Having worked 10 years at a psych hospital what most likely happened was an Order of Protective Custody was written up. If someone feels that a person is a danger to themselves or others you can go to the police and swear out an OPC and the police will go pick up said person and bring them to a hospital for a psych eval. At that point the doctors have to do an eval, and if they feel that yes this person needs to be in the hospital then the doctors write out a Physicians Emergency Custody order. This is where it stopped for this guy, and they apparently let him go. If the psych doctors think that further custody or treatment is needed the PEC is written up along with their evaluation and then another qualified expert (in Louisiana it was the Parish (County) Corner.. no I have no idea why the Corner of all people had that final sign off..) reviews the OPC, PEC, and Eval and then gives a yeah or nay on you staying with the white coaters for a while.
VP Elect Mike Pence is a special snowflake so of course he can refuse to turn over the emails (that would show wrongdoing on their part). Why in the world are you bothering these powerful people when they are busy trying to run the country (into the ground)?
Um.. wouldn't it be the Courts decision to determine if a website falls under Safe Harbor rights? DMCA notices are sent to the provider who can forward them to the users in question. If the Copyright Office is acting as a middleman in this and receiving notices from rights holders then forwarding them to the service provider.. its no wonder they are overworked and over budget.
I think so much information is leaking now because Comey knows that no matter who gets elected he is out of a job. Hillary won't keep him around because he dared to investigate her and Trump won't keep him around because he is Trump and is going to want to put his business friends in positions of power. Comey knows his ship is going down, I think he just wants to take the most likely winner down with him.
Yes, I've seen little notices on things like Newegg and other places I have bought online from that say 'X% tax included for residents of State A.' But if Netflix is in Seattle Washington (I've no idea where it really is..) and cities and counties in California are charging tax, isn't that interstate commerce?
Netflix and others should just claim that the office their billing comes from is overseas and then only the Federal Government can charge taxes on imports.
The thing I hate most about the FCC not acting on these is that as soon as they do (if they ever do..) come down on the providers they will get taken to court, yet again. They will cry "over reach" and "we have been doing it like this for years and they never had a problem with it". When it comes to corporate giants like this you have to take a firm hand early and often because otherwise they will take the inch you give them and run a thousand miles with it.