I don’t say Lord Lucifer, god of the rebellion, king of the earth, master and deliverer of knowledge and wisdom, said anything about trump. I did imply Trump saying something about not knowing would be typical of his actions though.
I think you fail to understand what protest means. Given I really, really, hope they charge him. We may finally have it settled where powers end, and how much the president can and can not do.
I’m sure their defence is, need to inventory individual items in custody. The whole safety thing. What if there was a 💣 or a ☢️ cell or some other invented concern. All too often that’s a free pass to open things up. Just look at the TSA mandating the opening of film cameras and cases.
Not sure how you reach that conclusion, but whatever. Despite what you believe, this is going to be an interesting case if he’s charged. There’s a lot of inconclusive methodology in how our government works and a lot of untested rules. This also goes back to Nixon, and the whole “not illegal when the president does it” idea. Though that case was criminal actions and this is about presidential permissions. Can a president, regardless of law, statute, or full, unilaterally declare the status of documents. If so, does that hold up in a vacuum. 🍿
Assent illegal then,
She was cleared of her ‘error in judgement’ by law. I accept that it wasn’t legal, though should have been and now is. As I said, look long enough and you’ll find something somewhere on any person.
Nice to know your feelings. I guess. Nobody asked how you felt about him though.
You’re welcome to (mis)believe whatever you want. The man is a non-factor to me. Especially here. What is of interest is how they deal with all the departmental overlap. The rights and privileges of a president. The time table, if any, where such legal abilities are removed or relinquished. And what the moderate and independent reaction is to this. As far as polling goes trumps cult is only a subset of republicans. But he got a wave of a bump post raid. The raid unprecedented. Waiving executive privilege is unprecedented. All of this is unprecedented. Everything here is. It’s going to be an interesting trial. If they charge him.
Actuality, the most recent thing I’ve seen, just now, is Trump apparently has the surveillance footage. And May release it. I hope he does, would be telling to see exactly what happened. Then all rumours are crushed with facts.
I haven’t heard tanks. Lol. But I have seen the footage from both local NBC and local Fox of all the cars. I never commented on trump being there or not. Other than I said it was excessive ‘despite home not being there’. Given secret service protection, I figured trump knew beforehand. Even if he claims he didn’t.
https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/biden-white-house-facilitated-dojs-criminal-probe-against-trump I have no idea the overall truth and chain of events, but could be damning. Again, this whole display-of-power show is going to play right into the hands of the far right fucks. And give them something to show that they’re right on something.
Again:
Which is why I return to the thought of not allowing electioneering on social mediaI don’t think they should be on twitter in the first place. Not for official or electioneering posting anyway. Twitter has the right to moderate any way they wish. Something I continually say and have not changed my view. Such posts like this one referenced should only be made on an official government hosted electioneering web site. And it should absolutely stay up there. Forever. So they can’t backtrack and say ‘I didn’t say that’! Personal, with a post like that, I think this fuck could possibly be arrested and tried for his threats. But he stopped short of an actual threat. He said he would make such actions legal, not that he would actually do so prior to a change in law. He’s still a fuck though. Sick man!
I agree. Hence:
Which is why I return to the thought of not allowing electioneering on social media
Actually, the only national paper I get news from daily is NYT. I get the WSJ on Friday. But don’t read much beyond actual trading reports. Fox News no longer offers a print (email/rss) feed for free. Not since the end of last year. I will read a story from the NYP when someone tosses a link my way. Doesn’t happen often. Daily mail is a British paper. I assume their focus is on British news. And I have no interest in what happens outside of my own country unless it’s an offensive strike. They all talk about the royal family and parliament and the EU and crap I simply don’t care about. You seem desperate to make out some level in trump himself in my watching the case. When my only initial commentary was about how such an over done over the top display of a raid fed right into the far right lions conspiracy theories and has the potential to give weight to some of those theories. Something the Dems don’t need going into what appears to be a Republican sweep of a midterm. Because this is going to be in everyone’s minds far after November! And if you don’t think this will have an effect on otherwise moderates, when everything about it looks like something done up for a Hollywood movie,… They way this was done, handled, vs the other methods possible, such as much lower profile, are going to bite all of us.
From the link:
Republican leaders, including President Trump, have slammed the idea, saying it would ultimately fail if it were put into action.What the public wants and what elected/electable leaders support are entirely different things. And while I don’t deny that there’s a strong support on the near right for universal tax paid healthcare, (52% polled in the link), You won’t come close to that for abortion. Or for the, SLOW!, fazing out of fossil fuel, or a tax funded electric charging platform. Or federal internet. Federal education. Good luck finding R majority for those things.
except the election wasn’t stolen. Not in they way republicans claim anyway. There’s no evidence of result-changing level fraud. From my understanding, the few cases of ballot dumping resulted in the ballots being carefully vetted, verified, and then counted. So there were no lost republican votes in trashed ballot dumps. There’s no evidence Russia, China, or any other country hacked into our machines and changed votes. And while no real investigation was done, even if the Philadelphia votes were back-dated after midnight, it wouldn’t have changed the results as Republicans claim(ed). If anything, it would have resulted in republican illicit votes. Since trump didn’t win in those counties, it’s meaningless as to the results. And a quick look at maps of voting history shows that even if Georgia had “missing” or “lost” votes not counted, the few districts that show below 100% counted are blue. Finding the “missing” votes, if they exist, are just more democrat votes. And while I deeply believe faithless electors are treasonous scum that should be drawn and quartered, NONE of the contested electors were faithless (as far as I can tell). Anyone still clinging to fraud is delusional.
If carrying trump’s water is: If saying dozens of armed meant picking up a few boxes of paperwork is excessive. If saying he has a right to a fair trial as any citizen of this country. If saying how poorly, and flashy, this was was going to bring every nutter out to vote. If that, somehow, equates to active support, you’re so delusional I can’t come up with a reply. Some of us still believe in law, order, and justice.
I’ve yet to hear trump state why he had them. Or of any evidence as to what he intended to do. So I’m not following what you claim has been debunked.
Yep, runs in both sides of my family.
File system check? I don’t see how that’s offensive. But if you need FSCK you’re FUCT in the first place.