Here's my main reason for keeping clear of the USA... http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/apr/18/tsa-mission-creep-us-police-state
My nads are off-limits.
Whoops, reply fail. The above was in response to ECA's comment above.
"...the movie and music industry holds all the cards."
I disagree with this statement: it seems to me that the public (as consumers) have the greater power as a) money flows from consumer to producer, and b) they have the means to bypass their distribution.
The producer's power lies chiefly with their ability to influence lawmakers and law enforcers.
"just explain how HBO is going to pay to produce Game of Thrones, Netflix makes Daredevil, etc"
It's not so bleak. Personally, I still buy physical media to give as presents. I sometimes watch public broadcasts of content that has been paid for by the advertisers whose content I also (have to) watch. I go to the cinema, oftentimes just to get out of the house.
Not to disagree with you, just pointing out that there are many different revenue streams. And many different moralities; Whisper's is certainly not universal.
Anywhere normal, that would sound like an incredible business opportunity, with government of any flavour encouraging entrepreneurs to wade in.
I just don't get the US government. At all. I understand the lobbying system, that it's legalized and tied into political donations, and that that makes politicians beholden to lobbyists. And that it's legal, and not bribery in any way. But unless US politicians live on some island somewhere, when their actions benefit lobbyists to the detriment of their own citizens they're just crapping on their own lawn, and that makes no sense.
I feel for you US guys. Have some kittens... http://www.kittenwar.com/
Fascinating yet bizarre - as for the Danes the statue is blanked out for the French, Finns,...
Brits, Russians, Spaniards do get to see her in the flesh.
Italians and Germans get several shots, some full-frontal.
Japanese, Dutch & Portuguese though doesn't even get a picture, blanked or otherwise.
"... create an Uncarrier image..."
Image building. I prefer actual substance over marketing.
"what does "taking the piss out of his customers" even mean? Is that British slang or something"
It is indeed British. Piss to the British is like snow to the Eskimo. Think rain; in Britain it's always pissing it down. However in this instance:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=taking+the+mickey
"There’s nothing better on NYE than some football and @Dominos #HomeOnNYE"
"New Years Eve means college football and @Dominos pizza."
I get that these are ESPN reporters, tweeting under their corporate umbrella, but it's a stretch to call these news articles. Yes these are wholesale ads, but Twitter doesn't have the equivalent of the "ad break", and using #Ad just seems clunky and ill conceived somehow.
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS
The USA has an urban/rural demographic in-line with Western Europe, similar in urban density to Norway and Sweden, and indeed higher than Switzerland, all leaders in broadband deployment. If you applied your rationale across the board, the USA ranking would still be low.
I'm inclined to blame lack of investment and political will for the US position.
"when the parents are gone and the kids are home alone"=very bad parenting
And arguably orders of magnitude more serious than TVs that spy on you.
I'm sensing massive and subtle sarcasm. I got through the below before I thought... woah there Spartacus
"This is an issue about consumer stupidity being so damn problematic as to hook a fucking television to the internet."
Way to blame the victim. This is absolutely about TV security and trust. What are people going to do when TVs ship with their own cellular chips, and don't even bother asking for your wifi password? Will you be wrapping your TV in aluminium foil?
Sorry to twist the knife further, but how many of those people who went to see Star Wars simply wanted to go watch a film?
Star Wars fans and cinema-goers are not disjoint sets...
I don't doubt state actors use ad delivery as a virus delivery route.
Why would they not? It's low-hanging fruit.
I think that's his whole point, that the ad network does not currently have control over content. And if it did, it would be less likely that malware would be distributed.
Trust might be restored. Somewhat.
"...a staggering $38 billion..."
It's worth clarifying that that figure reflects just gross sales. Taken as a whole, the global industry takes even greater revenue.
http://www.statista.com/statistics/259985/global-filmed-entertainment-revenue/
I have dim recollections from "The Tech Wars" in the nineties, when Hollywood was trying to strong-arm hardware makers into accepting more and more crap like DVD regionalization, someone somewhere made the observation that Hollywood brought $38B to the US economy, whereas Silicon Valley brought $600B. Hollywood lost the argument.
Sorry, I can't recall where I read that...
Re:
Rogue American cops - yet another reason to put off that trip to the States.