Difficult to see how they can exempt themselves. In dragnet surveillance everything gets swept up. So unless politicians submit their id's, logons, phone nos, etc. for filtering out, how will they be excluded?
And if they DO submit their details, it becomes an "of interest" list in it's own right...
Reply fail - my above post was a response to "Whatever Jan 10th, 2016 @ 5:45pm"
Enormous? We're talking about the meta-data of 3000 devices... That should fit on less than 100 sheets of A4.
And if the FBI has any decent asset management system, it should be straightforward to run a report. There's no insanity or time-wasting as you describe. I don't see the issue.
The UK has far easier ways of diverting tax revenue to the private sector.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/nov/17/hs2-the-human-cost-of-britains-most-expensive-rail-project
£57 billion for a mere 119 miles of track must have George Stephenson spinning in his grave. No-one in the UK wants this but the Gov. and the private sector. This is very telling, but it'll likely go ahead anyway, tearing through the heart of England's finest greensward.
It's a cardinal internet rule - don't tweet or post when you're in the middle of abusing something. Doubly so for company executives.
John Legere ought to know better. He should also know who the EFF is.
Exactly so. Ordinary folk pay taxes, entitled folk take benefits. Eadie is a scrounger in an expensive suit.
http://www.theguardian.com/law/2013/oct/23/two-lawyers-3m-fees-government
"i wonder if it's because Cameron is afraid of being found out because of something stupid he did before being Prime Minister..."
Doubt it - that particular pig has already squealed.
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/the-most-shocking-thing-about-piggate-is-that-it-wouldnt-be-the-worst-thing-david-cameron-has-done-10510916.html
It's worse. There's a attitude in certain circles that believe they have God-given right to put themselves and their crappy material right in your face.
Remember Mr & Mrs Spam, (Canter & Siegel)? Utterly unrepentant to this day.
I'm probably making a very stupid point, but I seem to remember from TV shows and films the police would dread a knock on their precinct door from "Internal Affairs". Surely that wasn't all make-believe?
There has to be some police oversight, right?
I think of them more as cretins playing with complicated and powerful instruments, well beyond their ken, regulated by third-rate wannabees...
Yes, Hoekstra is a hypocrite and an obnoxious one to boot, but maybe he'll realize that it's no fun having random people scrutinizing every electronic thing you do. For no good reason.
What angers me is that these "reviewers" (according to Doc Gerbil above) are senior people, designers, managers. You'd think they'd know better. It's perfectly clear they have no respect for their customers, for the gaming community, and they think themselves far superior to the great unwashed and mentally deficient folk of the internet.
Kudos to whoever unravelled this. I read the posts on Amazon, they're not that hard to identify. Look for the overuse of management-speak and pseudo-hip. And the oh so breathless gushing...
Re: Re: Re: Re: bee balm
Speaking of googling every damn thing... I seriously thought you'd misspelled STING and went off looking for a track of his I hadn't heard before called "All Good Things". I didn't get anywhere.
Then I saw "Picard" and thought... muppet.