As Its CEO Continues To Claim It Doesn't Throttle, T-Mobile Spokesperson Confirms Company Throttles

from the guys,-guys,-guys... dept

The T-Mobile throttling saga is getting worse. Their PR people have totally stopped responding to me after I pointed out how they were lying about their claims to be “optimizing” video when they were really throttling. And then the company’s CEO, John Legere insisted that claims that T-Mobile was “throttling” were bullshit (and then, bizarrely attacked EFF).

But, at the same time, a nameless T-Mobile spokesperson told Wired that, yes, just as all the tests have shown and just as we explained to you on Monday, T-Mobile is deliberately slowing down the delivery of non-partner videos, which by any definition (other than T-Mobile’s) is throttling:

T-Mobile customers who activate the company?s controversial Binge On video service will experience downgraded internet connection speeds when viewing videos on YouTube or other sites that don?t take part in Binge On, a T-Mobile spokesperson confirmed today. They?ll also experience slower speeds when trying to download video files for offline use from websites that do not participate in Binge On, at least until the customer deactivates the service.

Of course, even that statement is wrong. It’s not for “customers who activate” Binge On. T-Mobile automatically activated it for everyone, and then let you call in to customer service to deactivate it.

But the way that T-Mobile tries to insist that this is not throttling is now to argue that because users can turn it off that’s why it’s not throttling. Yesterday we noted that tricky sleight of mouth when Legere added an unnecessary clause to the definition of throttling. Here’s John Legere’s statement yesterday:

What throttling is is slowing down data and removing customer control. Let me be clear. BingeOn is neither of those things.

And again, there are two major problems with this statement: (1) As his own company’s spokesperson is now admitting, yes, they absolutely do slow down the data and (2) “removing customer control” has nothing to do with the definition of throttling. Especially when they made the initial choice for all customers.

And, just to add to this, let me remind you what a T-Mobile spokesperson told me via email just a couple of weeks ago:

Using the term ?throttle? is misleading. We aren?t slowing down YouTube or any other site. In fact, because video is optimized for mobile devices, streaming from these sites should be just as fast, if not faster than before. A better phrase is ?mobile optimized? or ?lower resolution.?

And yet now the company is admitting that they are, in fact, slowing down YouTube, not “optimizing” it or making the resolution lower. As I said at the time, T-Mobile is flat out lying. And now two statements from the company directly contradict each other, and the company’s CEO is still insisting that the company isn’t doing what the company admits it’s doing.

I’ve seen some corporate snafu meltdowns before, but this is reaching epic levels — and that’s bad news for a company that had spent so much time building up a reputation as a “straight shooter.” Good reputations are hard to build, but easy to let slip away….

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: t-mobile

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “As Its CEO Continues To Claim It Doesn't Throttle, T-Mobile Spokesperson Confirms Company Throttles”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
beech says:

benefit of the doubt

I was trying to give tmobile the benefit of the doubt. I thought, maybe there was just a bit of a communication problem between the techies and the execs. That is getting harder and harder to believe as this debacle goes on.

The correct answer from tmobile in the first place would have been, “huh, that’s weird. Let me look into this. ” instead they start flat out denying and name calling, therefore losing any goodwill i was prepared to give them

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Do you think...

Should he? Absolutely, and the sooner the better. The bluff’s been called, the lie’s been seen through, and the sooner he admits that he screwed up in what he said the better off he and his company will be.

Will he though is the question, and the company’s actions so far do not seem to bode well on that front.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Do you think...

In politics it is often a good idea to stand as firm as possible on your talking points to show leadership and if you stand your ground, at least some people will continue to believe you. If you make a too blatant mistake, stall or blame someone in your staff!

It is concerning to see larger business leaders taking on the politicians delusion of grandure. Legere and Zuckerberg are in my opinion playing the wrong game.

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: A "good idea"...

While standing firm on your talking points may preserve some of your followers in the short term, the rest of us recognize it as manipulative and antagonistic, since it’s regarding the people as a collective force to be managed, rather than individuals to be engaged.

Addressing the grievance and negotiating or solving the problem works in the long term because it demonstrates you’re willing to engage the public as persons with their own rights and agency.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Do you think...

It’s possible…

I happen to know that HR folks at T-Mobile have told him to “watch your mouth” at corporate meetings and PR events. As such, Legdir isn’t present in very often in the Seattle area anymore; for fear of HR repercussions and swearing like a sailor.

I firmly believe by the end of 2017, it’s very possible that T-Mobile will have a new CEO; and it shouldn’t be difficult for candidates to find Nils Palemann’s email address. Nils is the front-door for canidates looking to replace Legdir. Overall, he’s a very interesting person; and a former economics professor at NYU.

Today, he’s the only T-Mobile employee in the US with a email address. There’s certainly time for Deutsche Telekom to find adequate leadership to run the company.

In addition to this, before Legder ran T-Mobile US, the company had somewhere around 30m customers. Most of those customers stayed with the company because they had no other choice. The customers T-Mobile has been adding are better educated, more astute, and demanding when it comes to being a customer of their a wireless service provider.

OldMugwump (profile) says:

Sad thing is, what T-Mobile is doing may be useful

Throttling a video stream creates backpressure to the video server, forcing the server to reduce the bitrate (and video quality).

The sad thing is, T-Mobile is correct that this can actually be useful.

I’m sure many of their customers prefer to use less data (that they pay for) and accept lower video quality in exchange. My (old) eyes can’t tell the difference between HD and SD on a tiny phone screen, yet most video servers will push the maximum quality stream that’ll fit on the channel.

The problem is just the lying and confusion about it.

They want to call it “optimizing” because that sounds way better than “throttling”.

This is a marketing problem – they should have found an honest way to describe what they’re doing that doesn’t sound bad. (That, and make it trivial for customers to turn it off when they want.)

They could have called it a “data saver” or “bitrate reduction” (and then describe it accurately).

Of course the better way is for the phone to tell the server what video quality it wants (as configured on the phone). I assume IETF hasn’t gotten to that yet, or this wouldn’t be an issue in the first place.

Chronno S. Trigger (profile) says:

Re: Sad thing is, what T-Mobile is doing may be useful

The Youtube mobile app, the big one in question, does have a setting to automatically limit mobile data usage. It’s right there under General in the settings.

Any good app has these settings built in. The ones that don’t tend to not use large amounts of data.

This choice should never have been chosen for us.

OldMugwump (profile) says:

Re: Re: Sad thing is, what T-Mobile is doing may be useful

It’s a big pain to have to set limits separately on ever web site you use.

It should be a single setting in the phone (or more accurately, the web browser).

Since we don’t have that, what T-Mobile is doing is useful.

To some people, some of the time.

But I agree – it should have been opt-in. And without the lying.

Anon coward says:

Re: Sad thing is, what T-Mobile is doing may be useful

FYI playing with the quality server side actually increases load and cost usually.

For at least Youtube, the solution is each quality setting is pre-encoded, to prevent on the fly transcoding being required by either party.

On a home PC it goes, direct play usage around 5-10% in small spikes vs transcoding to from one format to another is around 80-90%

canuhearmenow (profile) says:

Re: Sad thing is, what T-Mobile is doing may be useful

“The problem is just the lying and confusion about it.”
Yes, ‘they’ keep wanting to call it ‘throttling’ because it sounds way worse then ‘optimizing’.

A few years ago, frakken Google wouldn’t even let you download an app, let alone play video, over mobile data. Now they insist must be allowed to serve 4K over the same? ‘They’ need to get their story straight!

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: It's another thing entirely for the head to be ignorant of what the hands are up to...

It is very difficult going to all those damn meetings where they cater coffee and donuts, several people are consistently late and others continuously bicker and moan, it is very difficult to get anything done.

Compare this to the non management employees who know what the hell is going on and get the job done everyday while at the same time dealing with management screw ups.

With this in mind, it is difficult to rationalize the huge and pervasive differences in salary and compensation.

Phil says:

Not surprising

I left T-Mobile in 2012 (and recorded the details here )

3+ years later, I’m glad to be reminded that I have made the right choice. My only question is… why is anyone else still on these big name shitty service carriers?

Is it like Cable TV, where there’s a monopoly in most of the country and no other choice for users?

tqk (profile) says:

Re: Not surprising

Is it like Cable TV, where there’s a monopoly in most of the country and no other choice for users?

It’s much worse than that. They buy politicians to pass laws against municipalities starting up their own competing services even in places they never intend to service. The largest markets tend to be lucky if service is offered by two competitors, much less many. Lesser populated (“fly-over country”) are lucky to have decent DSL if anything and the ISPs are falling all over themselves to force those users onto wireless or abandon them if possible. Add to this these ISPs are often cable providers also so they screw their wireless customers in order to prop up their cable TV divisions.

Where’ve you been hiding? :-O

Anonymous Coward says:

Other Telecoms should use this as advertisement

I am an AT&T customer and was waiting to jump to T-Mobile when their service is more reliable in my area. T-Mobile has made great changes to increase their speed, network coverage, building penetration, roller over data and other UnCarrier things. But it seems like the policy to activate by default of this controversial policy counters all the claims about how fast their network is now compared to before. It seems like T-Mobile can’t handle the masses of people using 1080p video. I think before all the Uncarrier promotions T-Mobile had ample bandwidth for the fourth largest network, but now that they are the third largest network, they need to use Binge On by default to manage their bandwidth to deal with all the people who switched over to magenta.

name withheld says:

2018 t mobile "slowing video"/demanding MORE CASH= RICO STYLE TACTIC !!

Forget the tech. jargon? BS, T Mobile’s actions equal RICO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, simple scam is an ON-GONG CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE, it meets RICO Standards. Write U.S.Justice Dept. to PROSECUTE !! forget FCC, FTC,every month JUST 4 days into my NEW INTERNET MONTH., T Mobile stops my video speed W/in 6 seconds they text me, “all data/video time has been used”… REALLY ??? NEVER IN THE LAST 5 YEARS !!. DEMAND MORE CASH, NOW !! or no usable video access, NONE, UNLESS I PAY CASH ! THAT IS RICO CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, The American people are choking on corporate CRIMINAL SCAMS every day !!

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
04:48 Dumb Telecom Take Of The Week: Because The Internet Didn't Explode, Killing Net Neutrality Must Not Have Mattered (23)
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
04:55 Axios Parrots A Lot Of Dumb, Debunked Nonsense About Net Neutrality (54)
10:50 NY AG Proves Broadband Industry Funded Phony Public Support For Attack On Net Neutrality (10)
06:24 The GOP Is Using Veterans As Props To Demonize Net Neutrality (22)
06:03 Telecom Using Veterans As Props To Demonize California's New Net Neutrality Law (12)
09:32 AT&T Whines That California Net Neutrality Rules Are Forcing It To Behave (11)
06:23 The New York Times (Falsely) Informs Its 7 Million Readers Net Neutrality Is 'Pointless' (51)
15:34 Facebook's Australian News Ban Did Demonstrate The Evil Of Zero Rating (18)
04:58 'Net Neutrality Hurt Internet Infrastructure Investment' Is The Bad Faith Lie That Simply Won't Die (11)
05:48 Dumb New GOP Talking Point: If You Restore Net Neutrality, You HAVE To Kill Section 230. Just Because! (66)
06:31 DOJ Drops Ridiculous Trump-Era Lawsuit Against California For Passing Net Neutrality Rules (13)
06:27 The Wall Street Journal Kisses Big Telecom's Ass In Whiny Screed About 'Big Tech' (13)
10:45 New Interim FCC Boss Jessica Rosenworcel Will Likely Restore Net Neutrality, Just Not Yet (5)
15:30 Small Idaho ISP 'Punishes' Twitter And Facebook's 'Censorship' ... By Blocking Access To Them Entirely (81)
05:29 A Few Reminders Before The Tired Net Neutrality Debate Is Rekindled (13)
06:22 U.S. Broadband Speeds Jumped 90% in 2020. But No, It Had Nothing To Do With Killing Net Neutrality. (12)
12:10 FCC Ignores The Courts, Finalizes Facts-Optional Repeal Of Net Neutrality (19)
10:46 It's Opposite Day At The FCC: Rejects All Its Own Legal Arguments Against Net Neutrality To Claim It Can Be The Internet Speech Police (13)
12:05 Blatant Hypocrite Ajit Pai Decides To Move Forward With Bogus, Unconstitutional Rulemaking On Section 230 (178)
06:49 FCC's Pai Puts Final Bullet In Net Neutrality Ahead Of Potential Demotion (25)
06:31 The EU Makes It Clear That 'Zero Rating' Violates Net Neutrality (6)
06:22 DOJ Continues Its Quest To Kill Net Neutrality (And Consumer Protection In General) In California (11)
11:08 Hypocritical AT&T Makes A Mockery Of Itself; Says 230 Should Be Reformed For Real Net Neutrality (28)
06:20 Trump, Big Telecom Continue Quest To Ban States From Protecting Broadband Consumers (19)
06:11 Senators Wyden And Markey Make It Clear AT&T Is Violating Net Neutrality (13)
06:31 Net Neutrali-what? AT&T's New Streaming Service Won't Count Against Its Broadband Caps. But Netflix Will. (25)
06:23 Telecom's Latest Dumb Claim: The Internet Only Works During A Pandemic Because We Killed Net Neutrality (49)
13:36 Ex-FCC Staffer Says FCC Authority Given Up In Net Neutrality Repeal Sure Would Prove Handy In A Crisis (13)
06:27 Clarence Thomas Regrets Brand X Decision That Paved Way For The Net Neutrality Wars (11)
More arrow