Don't forget BearShare. Removed that virus of a tonne of PCs in my day.
So if the "break the Internet" claims are true, why is my Internet still working?
Way to be deliberately obtuse.
it?s hard to imagine that Visa or MasterCard could claim to have a ?reasonable belief? that Bookshare was ?dedicated to theft of U.S. property?.
Except, from what I've heard and read about it so far, it's NOT Visa or MasterCard that need "reasonable belief." Somebody else has already made that determination, who then orders the payment providers to stop the funding channels, under the threat of litigation.
Seriously, how the hell are Visa or MasterCard excpected to look at an entity and determine whether their content is infringing? Saying they are the ones who must determine "reasonable belief" is just being deliberately misleading.
Hmmm... A reasoned and well balanced argument. What have you done with the real darryl?
Just like Uniform Motion paid for the song in order that you may hear it... and the recoups its expenses from the people who liked it enough (lets call them fans) to contribute monetary restitution?
I'm sure if you have him a multiple choice question with that last sentence as an option, he'd pick it.
Gabe Newell's statement is all right. Even if Steam is not perfect it is the only real alternative to piracy.
Here's the fundamental disconnect between game developers and gamers. File sharing sites provide a service. Steam provides a service. Good Old Games provides a service. Direct2Drive, OnLive and many, many others, provide a service. It's not the only alternative to anything. They are all just competing services.
Most of these stupid game developers still view what they do as creating a product when what they should be doing is providing a service. One that people are willing to use.
Provide a good enough service at an acceptable price and people will be willing to support it. The "digital goods" boat has sailed guys. Stop crying and move on.
I clicked the "funny" button so many times. I think it's a shame it only registers once. Are you seriously that deluded that you would actually refuse $1M physical dollars just for the apparent satisfaction of doing nothing and stamping your foot on the ground and complaining about losing potential dollars? HAHAHAHAHAHHAHA.
I can only assume ward 7B shares an internet connection.
It's just like I tell all the ladies. It's good for you. You need it. Get a little Iron into you :P
Close grandpa. You've almost got the hang of this 'net stuff.
In times without widespread file sharing, these would be the mega-fans, buying plenty of music.
With all that extra disposable income that just magically came from where, exactly?
I notice that you have slowly moved from answering Mikes question
Tim's...
I was able to find it for sale on Itunes, if that helps you out.
No. It doesn't help him out. Get it from iTunes walled garden and you have no choice but to watch it on iTunes, in Apples proprietary format, with DRM, so it is not easily transferable to all the devices he wishes to enjoy it on. You also have to pay more than the market would think reasonable for a possibly inferior encode.
On the contrary, the "scene" self regulates the quality of all encodes, can usually be found readily in a format of your choice, for whatever device you wish to enjoy it on, for an infinite number of times.
I have to tell you, most people despise iTunes as much as they despise the gatekeepers themselves. In addition to all this, the longer the "content industry" delays innovating to the point where people will happily part with money for content, the lower the actual perceived value of the content becomes. Leave it too long and the actual perceived value will, in fact, be zero.
That's because it was redundant.
Mike suggests that you give the movie away for free, then "sell scarcity", whatever that means.
So now that you've admitted you're completely clueless as to what "scarce" and "abundant" goods look like and how they are affected in a true free-market economy, don't you think it's time to really educate yourself before continuing your nonsensical rants?
Ermm.. This article wasn't written by mike. It was written by Derek Parham, a movie producer...
Fixed that for you...
Before initiating lawsuits in 2003, only 35 percent of people knew about file-sharing on P2P; afterward, awareness grew to 70 percent. ~ FTFY