Or at the very least, have a copyright regime that benefits the public instead of the greedy gatekeepers.
Thanks for your clarification. I really appreciate it!
Just out of curiosity, if David Love forwarded an email or retweeted a tweet defaming the two Drag Queens in question, the original emailer and the tweeter defaming the drag queens would be found liable, but not Love, thanks to §230 of the CDA. Since that defamatory disinfo came out of Love's own mouth even though it's not originally from him, he's on the hook. Do I have that right?
Following copyrights to the letter is significant part of what makes our technology good.You do know that Fair Use is in the letter of US law, right?
Ah, then to answer your question, I don't know.
Even in the Greek myth, Midas turning everything he touches into gold is problematic, as he can't embrace his daughter or drink water anymore. So to answer your question, no.
Sadly, we all know how that will end and fortunately, the modern world thinks war is something to be avoided.Except if you're Benjamin Netanyahu, Vladimir Putin, or have any sort of power in the US government.
Fair enough.
"Transgenderism" is not a thing. You must be thinking of reality.
No, they're Journalists. Making lots of money isn't their goal; Journalism is. That it makes money is besides the point, it just sustains them.
And may there be two million more (insightful and/or funny) comments in TechDirt's future!
According to your maximalist definition of ©, you'd regard google translate as a violation of © (because translations are covered under copyright).
Anti-Zionism isn't Anti-Semitism, fuckface.
Atheists are motivated by authentic knowledge to do the right thing, without the judgment of a dumbass killjoy that doesn’t believe in a gender spectrum.How does that square with the oft-mentioned eight genders of the Talmud?
Thank you! That means a lot! 😃
But perhaps most memorably, this was when we first came across the analysis and now-famous associated graph (actually published the previous week) showing how the length of copyright has followed the age of Mickey Mouse.Perhaps coincidentally, I'm wearing an "EFF Presents - Fix Copyright" T-shirt with Mickey Mouse from Steamboat Willie right now, all because Steamboat Willie's copyright expired, something that actually happened this year. This is why we should never, ever give up hope.
This is why the Internet was a far, FAR better place before the politicians and business people and everyone else with money and power on their minds got involved.Well, keep in mind that section 230 was created by politicians. and it was fortunately the only think that survived from the Reno v. ACLU SCOTUS case (back when SCOTUS was an actual court and not a far-right legislature).
*with hooks on both sides of my mouth* "What are you smilin' at?"
You know what? All my original music and public domain covers (and covers of songs that are creative commons and allow derivatives) are uploaded to the internet archive. I do this in addition to putting my works for sale on bandcamp as well as selling them on iTunes and AmazonMP3 as well as streaming services such as Spotify, Apple Music, Deezer, Tidal, etc. Why do I do this? Because I want even poor people to access my music, and thinking I could prevent copying on computers is just as foolish as preventing people from having sex, so I might as well give it away for free.