I don't see what's wrong with IN-N-OUT trying to protect their name from being used by some shady outfit trying to profit off their hard work.
So let me get this straight you think it's perfectly ok for a multibillion dollar company to steal the product that a much smaller company paid people to create.
I'm 100% against what Huffman and co are doing but I do find it hilarious to watch the Mods deal with the same treatment a lot of them do to the users of their subs. I literally got perma banned with no warnings and no previous strikes from r/AITA for saying a human trafficker was acting kind of like a Karen and then when I asked why I was banned they literally tried to get me banned from all of Reddit. I appealed and got my Reddit account back because the ban was ridiculous.
I've worked in an industry for 30 years that has gotten more more automated and I can tell you from experience it has cost jobs because it takes less people to produce more product with less knowledge so they also get paid less for the job so 1. less people employed and 2. paid less for the work. That's 100% what's going to happen to all industries that AI/automation take over. Even your quotes state that less skilled workers can do the job with AI do you honestly think the owner class is going to pay high wages for a job an unskilled worker can do.
Not disagreeing with your overall premise but since when is 33% of a population an insignificant % of the population?
That you are incredibly stupid and are arguing a point no one made you just misunderstood what was going on.
It's a Comprehension problem on your part. The blue check mark was never worth anything what it represented is what was worth something and when you take away what it represented it's worth less than nothing.
So let me get this clear Walgreens withholding lifesaving drugs to appease politically motivated AG's isn't morally wrong but Gavin Newsom not wanting to to business with themn is.
Jesus every reply I see from you makes you look dummer and dummer.
Don't forget the internet he's using to post to the world how bigoted and stupid he is is a result of that socialism he hates.
Jesus you're stupid 230 protects sites from being sued for moderating. getting rid of it would cause the thing you're pretending to care about.
They weren't unclear they straight up lied.
I wouldn't be shocked if they did make this exclusive to PS5 as a defense against Microsoft trying to gobble up every big game studio and making everything exclusive to xbox and pc even after they explicitly say they won't and then immediately do after the focus moves away from the merger.
Anyone that think decentralized social networks are a good idea lives in a fantasy world. You know all the problems Twitter has around moderation and hate speech effecting the real world multiply that by at least 10 with a decentralized system that makes it impossible to moderate hate speech and propaganda.
This is different than the fuck cheer because it specifically targets a group that is the victim of a massive amount of hate crimes.
It's hard to take anyone seriously that uses the both sides fallacy. I thought you were better than that Mike.
Because of a corrupt judge that basically gave the jury no choice but to acquit.
Project Veritas is not press they are a criminal organization. At best they are a political propaganda arm of the RNC.
Nope the point of stripping qualified immunity away is now the officers are personally liable not the tax payers.
Bigotry isn't a protected class
Is the author of this article under the impression that being a bigot is a protected class like sexual orientation is because if it isn't the whole premise of the piece falls apart.