I can see it now - we haven't disconnected people, only reduced their bandwidth to 1 bit per fortnight.
I can see it now - we haven't disconnected people, only reduced their bandwidth to 1 bit per fortnight.
In a related note, there's an interesting article over on Slate discussing the strange position we're in whereby law enforcement can use various non-lethal weapons on their citizenry, but the Geneva conventions prohibit their use on enemy combatants as causing "superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering".
We need a Geneva convention on use of weapons on civilians!
Unauthorised sharing of copyright works is far less serious than sex offences? It's almost as if you don't care about artists!
Thus proving that popcorn farmers require patents (and the silly lawsuits/retribution that follows) in order to survive.
Or was it copyright they needed?
I forget.
"The more you tighten your grip, Disney, the more fans will slip through your fingers."
- Princess Minnie
You think Disney ignore an existing story and come up with their own? Yeah, that's gonna happen.
Ever since that funny film they did about a mouse on a steamboat I don't think they've done anything original. Not counting drafts of copyright legislation of course.
Maybe Sony, the Whitehouse, StratFor, Iranian uranium centrifuges etc, etc have all been using Huawei equipment?
Only problem will be:
Phone - where's my pho... oh, wait. Dammit!
Oh dear, wish I wasn't playing the copyright drinking game!
Using the word steal to refer to infringement: Take a drink
Correct usage of the word steal with reference to copyrighted material: Drink all the alcohol in the house
Come on, the plague was pretty fair, or at least non-discriminatory. The plague did exactly what it was meant to do - spread virulently and kill people. No hypocrisy, no lies.
Comparisons with fox news and the copyright lobby are what gives the Black Death a bad name!
It's at times like this Voltaire must be turning in his grave. I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
(I know, he apparently didn't actually say that but, hey, go and eat cake)
Turns out we don't have "free speech" laws, but free "speech laws" ... we were given some opressive laws without having to pay for them*
*financially I mean, obviously we pay for the with our liberty
Quite. I'd be even more worried about the FBI if they weren't able to foil their own plots.
They've managed to keep a 100% record for just over 11 years now!
One door opens, another one closes:
While I might now buy the next Ubisoft game, unfortunately it looks like I'm going to have to give the next SimCity a miss, which will be disappointing as it'll be the first SimCity I've not bought.
http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2012/03/28/simcity-to-be-crippled-by-always-on-lets-change-this/
If you can't get them for spying, get them for lying?
Sounds like the Al Capone method of prosecution (or rather the Frank J Wilson method I guess)
Did you know you have the same name as the guy who runs Techdirt? Must be awkward when people mistake you for someone else with diametrically opposite views!
If you're not allowed to sell products that advertise student athletes, where does that leave the colleges?
After all I'm sure they advertise their courses including comments on current star student athletes. Come study at LSU with Tyrann Mathieu!
Correct, I'm saying they haven't been victimised. I was taking victimised to be the subject of a targeted attack rather than someone periphally affected. The victim of an attack if you will.
Granted you can think of "victim" as anyone affected, perhaps I should have used more specific language.
Consider the last line to read as "Are they specifically targetting 2012TicketAlert? Don't believe so"
Re: So much for learning from the past
Not just cars, any invention which is ubiquitous today had to pass through the 6% usage point.
- indoor toilets
- domestic electricity supplies
- mobile phones, hell even home telephones
- literacy