The formers head of the american psychological association, did a series of interviews about the LGBT movement in sanfransisco, and explained that political ideology has poisoned the field, (just as it did in the soviet union). But to every normal individual, living in denial of reality is a mental illness.
46% of transexuals try to kill themselves, so "most" is a misleading misnomer.
IF it is an endocrine disorder, then the "Gender affirming care" would be to normalize their hormone levels, rather than further distrupting them. But 99% of these cases are not an issue of endocrine disorders or genetic abnormalities, but rather mental illness masquerading as identity politics (my step father is a trans racial mexican jew)
They claim that transgender people are being "genocided", yet when you support genitally mutilating and sterilizing children, that is somehow NOT genocide. Not only that but trangeder people are by definition ending their genetic line by doing so, so its functionally impossible to "genocide" a transgender. Then they want to call people fascists, yet when it comes to totalitarianism, its the left who cant stand freedom of speech, parental control of their childrens education, and systematic discrimination such as affirmative action and "equity". War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.
I guess you have never heard of child custody hearings, and near absolute parental control of who their children associate with
I guess you have never heard of child custody hearings, and parental control of children.
Children do not have the "right to free association" only pedophiles would tend to think so.
second sentence on wikipedia: "Shows can range from burlesque-style, adult themed nightclub acts to all-ages events with sing-alongs and story times."
No the judge ruled on the issue of qualified immunity, which is completely different that judging on the merits. Other than that, strippers are engaged in free expression, but there is a reason why children are not allowed in strip clubs, because children do not get full constitutional rights, nor do people have full first amendment rights to speak to children, which is why we have internet child privacy laws.
To be clear you put states attorney generals together with "nonsense peddlers", then you call a federal judge "batshit crazy", none of those are legal analysis but rather political pejoratives
Also, the part that the states are quoting above is from the district court ruling and not the 5th Circuit injunction, which is what is on appeal. Which is… kinda weird. Basically, the states are trying to pretend that the 5th Circuit adopted the district court’s ruling, when it mostly did not.What you fail to understand is that the district court is the one who is the "finder of fact", so an amicus applying the law to the facts is going to cite the district court.
You have proven that you have never filed taxes.
It was Trump weaponizing the legal system for political purposes.Isn't that the entirety of the complaint in the first place, in trumps words "the russia hoax", rather than challenging the election as you falsely claim.
I already RISK MY FUCKING LIFE just by commenting here anonymously. And I’m very well aware that all it takes is a determined “conservative” asshole to get me arrested or worse.take your meds
We have a debt ceiling crisis less that 6 months after passing the last debt ceiling raise for another 12 months? Our credit rating was downgraded by the rating companies, explicitly because of the debt / GDP ratio?
You still do not have competition, you have state sponsored entities, building duplicate infrastructure. It is literally more efficient to just build the infrastructure once, and mandate that the companies have to be common carriers and profit capped.
You might have a point if Cruz (or any Republican) pointed out the parts of the bill that they liked, and then explained why they still felt the need to vote against it. Hell, any of them could retroactively do that today. Doing so would destroy the idiotic illusion they’ve tried desperately to create for their constituents, and would be the opposite of propaganda. Can’t have that.You have demonstrated to everyone that you have never watched CSPAN, and only watch propaganda.
Alot of their current thinking was that they could build content scanners on the users device, which would only phone home if something bad is detected.
But it does show the idiot has no real business sense. You do not give away money. Not until you have sufficient profit.uhh, have you not noticed how nearly every internet startup has the "give away free shit" as their first step towards market dominance?
No, this is going to be how he turns his dog money investment profitable, by making twitter pay in dog coins.
Even Justice Ginsberg didn't like how Roe v. Wade was justified, the courts in the 60-70's engaged in alot of legislating from the bench, including non unanimous juries for example.