Regarding that Paul Chambers guy mentioned in one of the linked articles, since it is apparently the opinion of the UK courts that it is illegal to transmit the movie quote he uttered over the internet… wouldn’t it follow that it is illegal to stream that movie to any UK address?
I had severe heat exhaustion when I was 20. Just a few minutes from actual heat stroke (and not the hyperbolic kind) when I got treated for it, though the treatment wasn’t up to par, and I had lasting damage from it. If I am exposed to too high heat for too long, I will literally die. What feels like a pleasantly warm day to you will see me in considerable distress. What feels like a hot day to you, will see me in an ambulance on the way to the hospital. 78 doesn’t seem like much to you, but how would you fare at 108? That’s my lot in life, everything feels hotter than it is, with corresponding potential harm, because my body doesn’t regulate internal heat properly anymore. I have measures in place to prevent that, but a utility company reaching into my home and disabling those measures would literally be attempted murder, if it happened on a sufficiently hot day.
What amuses me about it is that if the rights holder gave the site the media, then the rights holder licensed it to them by doing so. The ONLY way the rights holder could sue and win, given how ALL internet traffic is logged and traceable, is to prove they’re not the rights holder.
I defy even Texas to prove gay secks causes more gay people to exist! 🤣
You gotta love a well-tailored Messing With Texas campaign.
It doesn’t take an army. Especially when the target doesn’t have an army either. As any professional bodyguard can tell you, if someone is willing to do whatever is necessary to kill a specific target, that target will die, no matter what their bodyguards do about it.
Given how cruelty to and killing of animals is a warning sign of a serial killer, I think the fair official who was obsessed with killing this particular goat at all costs, no matter how many laws needed to be broken, needs a closer look ASAP!
A better system dates back to the old Greek democracies - in some cases, people could be elected against their will, with penalties for refusing to serve. That would neatly solve the problem of anyone smart enough to serve not wanting to.
Yup. And all the methods of defeating those workarounds require an online facial recognition database - the easiest being to scan an unexpired ID against the state’s ID database.
I know I would choose to install a geographic filter rather than have to hire five extra people just to do California’s paperwork!
Future AI 911 ‘Live’ Chat Operator: “We’re sorry, but you cannot call for help without a facial ID verification. Please try again.”
“Texas is a free and independent State, subject only to the Constitution of the United. States, and the maintenance of our free institutions and the perpetuity of the Union depend upon the preservation of the right of local self-government, unimpaired to all the States.” How, precisely, does the dissenter on the 5th circuit court get the idea that the US Constitution does not prohibit the state legislature from enacting statutes that blatantly violate it?
You mean the contract that says Google can terminate service for any reason or none at all?
There is no requirement in contract law that the contract specify that they obey the laws they are required to. In fact, any contract term that violates the law is unenforceable, null and void. Their user agreement says they can revoke access for any reason or none at all, which certainly covers revoking service to those accused of trafficking in CSAM.
If you attack someone with a weapon you know for a fact is a deadly weapon and they die, you don’t get to claim later on that you didn’t intend their death. To anyone who hasn’t spent several decades living under a rock and/or in a carefully constructed pro-police echo chamber, sending US police after someone, especially someone you convince the cops is a major threat, is well understood to be deadly force. The proper sentence for premeditated murder is 20 years to life imprisonment, with an option for execution. The fact that this piece of human garbage sent assassins instead of wielding the weapon himself doesn’t make his act any less murderous or premeditated.
Last I checked, rules such as for games could be patented but not copyrighted. How exactly can languages - which are nothing but a set of rules for speaking - be copyrighted?
So why is it, that if the criminal penalty for filing ONE false report can be as high as 6-12 months imprisonment in most states, or even be a felony in a few, that none of the people following Hertz’s official policy to file false reports has been arrested, charged or prosecuted? Last I checked, an organization that makes it official policy to commit crimes is classified as a criminal organization under the RICO Act. Why is Hertz still in business after showing a pattern of crimes being official policy?
I’ve run into that attitude a fair amount as an on-again, off-again amateur photographer. When I take a photo, the copyright on that photo is mine. But if I do an especially good job on it, I won’t be able to get it printed at any professional copy or print shop that doesn’t offer self-service machines, because the professional shops will all inform me that they cannot print copyrighted material without permission from the rights holder - and nothing I say will convince them that I am the rights holder to my own work. Even a copy of a copyright registration won’t sway them. Because copyrights are for companies, not individuals, apparently.
You’re new to Techdirt, aren’t you? Go back into the site archives and look up the dozens of articles about how automated content moderation is the only way to do it, but at the same time automating the job doesn’t work. The biggest and best funded companies in the world routinely fail spectacularly at automated content moderation, and they can afford the absolute best tools for it. It doesn’t help them surpass the level of a dumpster fire in their content moderation efforts. TikTok is not the biggest and best funded company in the world by a long shot. It’s really easy for you to SAY they should be able to do this easily, but the reality is that of the first rate companies can’t, there’s no way a third-rate company like TikTok has any chance at all.
Nothing in any city, county, state or federal law renders a judge immune to arrest for violating the Constitution - in fact, judges have been arrested and prosecuted for it in the past. Federal statutes define a conspiracy to violate civil, statutory or constitutional rights to be a felony, and unless a judge is carrying out his orders in person, a judge issuing an unconstitutional order is conspiring to do so by default. Any city, county or state law enforcement officer, while not compelled to enforce federal laws (this is how sanctuary cities happen) can do so if they choose - so why do they just stand around wringing their hands when something like this happens? If police will do nothing, it falls to the citizens. A citizen’s arrest for a federal felony is lawful in about 99% of the USA - in 48 states and all federal areas, according to the US Supreme Court (US v. Di Re (1948)).