I just looked around for streaming alternatives to cable, and didn't find any that don't carry Fox News and presumably pay for the carriage. There don't seem to be alternatives.
IIRC, Takings from the Public Domain when copyright terms were extended didn't do well as an argument in Eldred v. Ashcroft.
who is driving into the parking lot of a bar at 12:45 in the morning. No reason to victim-blame, but if we’re going to bring up his newborn at all, what’s he doing out? shopping for formula?
Some Senator should send Fox that letter, modified as suggested, just to get a catalog of the ensuing outrage. Then use that as counterpoint whenever this shit comes up in original form.
the really partisan argument is that USF in general is unnecessary socialism and shouldn’t exist at all. It’s hard to have a serious policy discussion when some people carry “there should be no government policy or taxation” as their starting point.
If the example of "Florida Man" is of any indication, "Apple Man" may be indicative of something they don't want associated with the brans.
Such as when the TV broadcasters were up in arms about the ability of a TiVO or other DVR skipping commercials on playback, on the belief that that was somehow violating something -- like the social contract, maybe.
Nevertheless, even today a TiVO doesn't completely skip forward, but forces you to watch blip-verts of the things being fast-forwarded through.
My priors are firmly reinforced!
A while back there was a an inkling that transcripts were soon to be available.
Is that happening yet? I don't see a visible link anywhere.
thx.
They'll kill your dog."
They’d far rather have all speech but their own suppressed, and user generated content has always been something they do because they feel they have to rather than something they want.
“They’ll think what I tell them to think!” — Charles Foster Kane
I saw one yesterday that claimed 85% of men who take ivermectin become sterile.
True or not, I'd like that to go wildly viral.
I leave it to someone with more time than me to explore the NYPD link
and see how hard it is to go to the "disciplnary history" tab of the popup for each and every office and scrape any data.
When people get these notifications, I expect some of them will post the charges somewhere. It'll be interesting to see the specifics and how contentious the cases become. It seems likely some of the takedowns will result in, "Oh, yeah, I guess so", a lot of "Mah Freedom!", and some "Oh, come on."
What is the antitrust violation in this? I don't see where they conspired with competitors. We might like it to be a violation of the law, but I'm not clear it is anything beyond rent-seeking asshattery.
Just because they published the opinion doesn't make it the view of the editorial board or the news department.
I just hate this kind of headline.
Fair to complain about giving somebody space, but ascribing the views to the outlet is just incorrect and inflammatory.
It's not the view of the outlet, it's the view of the person that wrote it.
Fair to complain about giving them space, but it's inflammatory to ascribe the opinions to the outlet itself.
I just hate that.
In my neighborhood, they just put a paint store basically across the street from the store of a somewhat loved semi-local brand. That seems... dubious.
irrelevant spam
if true, you have sympathy, but this doesn't belong here.