So, what you're saying is you prefer to stalk Mr. Masnick on Twitter and TechDirt? Sounds like a true TechDirt fanboi…… :) Awww, him lervs him some Maz….:P
"cheaty"? Really? chortle
Once again, not true. I've had several of my comments flagged. And you know what? I don't really care :) I still read TechDirt because of their expertise and reputation, not necessarily their politics.
Ok, lawyer boi, please provide a link to the exact webpage that shows where Mr. Masnick is doing anything illegal. I would LOVE to see it. FTFY
Uh, actually, I'm a conservative. You see me gleefully replying to your shitposts….
Then.....uh....stop posting here, maybe??? I dunno. If you put your hand on a hot stove and get burned, is it really a good idea to put your hand BACK on the same stove? Think??
Couple of facts about moi:
A. Techdirt fanboy, Yes.
B. Love of Google. Absolutely NO.
C. Agree 100% with Mr. Masnick on every single idea he's posted here. Also no.
However, you throwing around such ridiculous claims, WITHOUT proof, is PRECISELY why your comments keep getting flagged by the community.
You're just a trolling douchebag. Jump on Parler, already.
I spent 8 years stationed at Fort Bliss, Texas. It was anything but.... :P
It's painfully obvious you have no concept of the difference between Moderation, Discretion and Censorship. Oh, how convenient, here's a primer: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20200521/10454244546/moderation-v-discretion-v-censorship-theyre-not-same.shtml FTFY
full of spam links and.....shit? It was shit that you were going to type next, right??
This whole thing (trading the signing of the NDAA for repealing Section 230) is just 12 types of stupid in an 8 stupid bag.
That's it. Twitch just isn't worth the time.
I'm out....
Duly noted.
Wow. Context really eludes you, doesn't it. Your vacuous trolling know no bounds. But hey, you do you. :)
I named only 2 platforms, not the entire internet. FTFY
The idea is that these filters are interoperable amongst platforms, which, prima facie, is good for openness and inclusiveness. But, allowing the design choices of filters to be made by a handful of companies turns them into de facto standards bodies. This provides neither inclusivity nor openness.
Just like Facebook and Twitter picking and choosing who is allowed to post opinions online provides neither inclusivity nor openness.
Got it.
Homeowner must sign a waiver. I'm pretty sure, as TechDirt has pointed out in previous Ring posts, that the police department will keep a careful list of homeowners who "politely decline" to sign a waiver.
AOC can add that to her list of people we should go after...... :)
Patiently waiting on Mike's followup article where Sci-Hub is sued by someone for DCMA takedown action.....
Gotta agree with most of the crowd here, Koby. Trump is still able to communicate his thoughts via a dozen other media outlets. In order for him to be censored, then Trump would have to have NO mechanism whatsoever of expressing his opinions. I think a fairer display of bias, on both sides, is what information each news outlet/social media outlet chooses to cover and which information they choose to deliberately NOT cover. The argument is valid for everyone from FoxNews/OAN to Facebook/Twitter.
Re: A "safe space" for leftists / snowflakes means WITHOUT DISSE
Mmmmm, the psychosis is strong in this one......