"HORSES DONT DRINK DRIVE" that should be
I remember the political scaremongering around horseless carriages.
"HORSES DONT DRIVE DRIVE!"
"Horses: lowering your carbon hoofprint"
"Cruise control: more dangerous than a demented horse!"
"Horses: biodegradable"
"1 Horse = 1 horse power. None of these funny metric units here"
Cue the US staging an invasion of the UK to 'liberate' us
FIrst time in a while it's seemed like 'these are my favourite posts' rather than 'this is a summary of the entire week's posts'
No matter. Lawyers were outlawed in Kyrgystan in 1986. His council and executioner will be one very hungry goat
Despite freedom of speech in the USA your comment just broke the law in Kyrgyzstan, so I'm sure you've no objection to be extradited there to be tried?
I guess we'll start getting TSA style 'you got checked' flyers in our postal mail?
http://www.thepoke.co.uk/2012/06/01/patch-of-dirt-that-resembles-2012-logo-slammed-by-olympic-committee/
And with the original post at 129 characters, he'd easily have had room!
"The Government seeks forfeiture of all of Defendants? revenue because it has assumed all of the revenue is tainted by crime."
Plus the Government gets 10% royalty, right?
Reminds me of this:
http://iwastesomuchtime.com/on/?i=36988
I also use Vodafone. I first noticed content control when trying to access the web site of a local brewery. It's insane.
I can easily avoid their content control by using wifi, so what's the point? They're just trying to avoid 3rd party liability.
It's also easy to bypass if you google for 2 seconds.
My mother in law believes every damn word. Having her visit is typically a fun event until she starts parroting their bullshit
'tis a shame it's the main UK paper they give out free at airports. Paints a horrible picture of UK citizenry (or at least a certain underclass)
It annoys me because it doesn't tell me if the person enjoyed the article, only that they read it. As a social media sharing exercise, it's stupidly pointless.
Re:
My thoughts exactly