I suppose the legal basis is that "innocent until proven guilty" doesnt apply to your car since your car has no rights being that it is not a person.
When is the last time you heard spectacles used as a generic term for glasses? 200 year old books dont count.
"Chen sued the FBI, who won’t reveal who leaked the info." So jail the person in the fbi responsible for trying to keep the secret.
Israel should shut these down altogether. It shouldnt be legal to sell malware to anyone. Shame!
I dont think the final total $ amount is really relevant. What is relevant is that he got 6% of the company. Did the shareholders know he was getting 6% of the company when they agreed to the deal? I also dont buy the idea that it was clear the company would make those gains before they did. No one knows the future. The appeal will be interesting.
I used to sub to SJMN back when it was a paper newspaper. But now there is internet I read from maybe dozens of newspapers 1. Im not subbing to all of them. 2. I dont read enough from any one of them that they deserve a full subscription. Seems like by the article is a better way of paying for what you are getting.
Youre right that being a loudmouth doesnt justify arrest. However refusal to leave is trespassing, and refusing a lawful order from a police officer is also a crime.
Turn off his mic and turn up the one that is her turn to speak. You have the right to your say but in a public meeting you are supposed to allow the other side to speak. Shouting the other side down is not free speech imo.
"I cant define porn but I know it when I see it". Same for religion.
I do the same. If they are not on contacts list I dont answer. If its important they can leave a voice mail. I cant imagine any call could be so important that I need to answer it instantly.
Its not my time woman. /Momglare Ohhk mom
A fact can be proven or disproven. An opinion cannot be proven or disproven.
Sounds like a mistake to me. Not a big deal so long as they dont use AI for the cards themselves.
Lawyers: "You F'd up. You trusted us" Oh wait. That was Animal House.
I think NYtimes giving the court transcripts of results that were exact copies wont cut it in court. How does the court know if that text was the actual result or if it was doctored by NYT? The evidence is basically hearsay. "I prompted this and this is what it said". NYT will need to query the LLM in court and show in real time that it can produce infringing text.
GOP calls to ban tiktok began when people on it made mockery of their god DT
Microsoft changed contracts not to evade the lawsuit, but to come into compliance with your implied requirements.
In all copyright complaints you need to show either that the distributed output is the copyrighted work or at least too much like the copyrighted work. Basically a side by side comparison. AI produced works are not copies. The output style may be like a copyrighted work but style is not copyrightable.
how is this legal now?
If the Montana law failed on 1st amendment grounds then how is it suddenly ok when congress does it?