Comcast Pinky Swears That The Death Of Net Neutrality Won't Hurt In The Slightest

from the just-a-little-pin-prick dept

In the wake of the FCC's attempt to kill net neutrality, ISPs like Comcast have been working overtime trying to convince the press and public that nothing bad is actually happening. Shortly after the FCC voted to begin killing the rules, Comcast posted a trifecta of press statement, comment from company CEO Brian Roberts and commentary from top lobbyist David Cohen all saying the same thing: nothing bad is happening, and whatever happens -- Comcast really, truly adores transparency and will work tirelessly to defend the open internet:

The fact that this runs in stark, documentable opposition to reality and Comcast's behavior over the last twenty years isn't something you're supposed to dwell on. Cohen (the company gets mad at us for pointing out he's still a lobbyist despite using the title of "Chief Diversity Officer" to dodge lobbying accountability rules) has also been spending the last month or so trying to argue that we can still have net neutrality despite walking back the FCC's authority over broadband providers:

"While some try to conflate the two issues, Title II and net neutrality are not the same. Title II is a source of authority to impose enforceable net neutrality rules. Title II is not net neutrality. Getting rid of Title II does not mean that we are repealing net neutrality protections for American consumers."

That ignores history. You'll recall that the FCC's original 2010 rules were demolished by the Verizon lawsuit, with the courts saying that the FCC couldn't impose such rules without first classifying ISPs as common carriers under Title II. So in 2015, former FCC boss Tom Wheeler did precisely that. Walking back that decision means stripping out the legal authority to actually enforce net neutrality, and Comcast certainly knows this. In fact we've repeatedly noted how the government's plan is to effectively gut privacy, net neutrality and other broadband consumer protections, and to replace them with the policy equivalent of wet tissue paper.

This message that nothing bad is actually happening and that Comcast really secretly loves net neutrality has been the cornerstone of an ongoing PR effort at the company the last few weeks. But given there's few if any people who trust what's arguably the least-liked company in America, responses to these claims on Twitter haven't been what you'd call warm:

One of the only pieces of evidence Comcast provides for its professed dedication to net neutrality is that it didn't, unlike Verizon, sue to overturn the FCC's 2010 rules. But as we noted back then, Comcast and AT&T didn't oppose the rules back then because they weren't really enforceable, but more importantly they simply didn't do very much. Having been written by Google and major ISPs, they carved out massive loopholes for all manner of anti-competitive behavior, and didn't even cover wireless networks.

But as the EFF writes in a missive taking aim at Comcast's new image reformation effort, the company also saw no point in suing then because it was bound to adhere to the (already flimsy) rules as a condition of its 2011 merger with NBC Universal:

"In its PR campaign, Comcast claims that its decision not to challenge the 2010 Open Internet Order is evidence of its support for network neutrality. In reality, it's likely the company stayed quiet because shortly after the Open Internet Order was approved Comcast was required to operate neutrally as a condition of its merger with NBC Universal. It had little to gain from publicly opposing the 2010 Order because they could not lift network neutrality obligations over their network even if they won in court due to merger conditions."

In short, Comcast didn't fight to overturn the 2010 rules because it loves net neutrality -- it did so because it knew the rules were garbage, and merger conditions wound up binding the company to them anyway (for whatever good that would have actually done). It's only once the rules had actual teeth -- provided by Title II authority -- that Comcast began to get nervous that somebody might actually stop the company from being an anti-competitive jackass.

Comcast's positions are viciously contradicted by a decade of indisputable anti-competitive decisions on this front, including the company's early decision to throttle all upstream BitTorrent traffic (and lie about it, repeatedly), its ham-fisted decision to use usage caps and overage fees to hamstring video competition, and it's decision to try and limit what devices consumers use to view the content of their choice on the platforms of their choosing.

By and large you'd be hard pressed to believe any major ISP -- especially Comcast -- has much if any credibility on this subject, and it's not really clear exactly who one of the least-liked companies in America thinks it's fooling.


Reader Comments

The First Word

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Ninja (profile), 7 Jun 2017 @ 4:47am

    "nothing bad is happening, and whatever happens -- Comcast really, truly adores transparency and will work tirelessly to defend the open internet"

    Said with fingers crossed behind them. If past actions are any indicative of what will happen, the corpse of Title II will still be hot and fresh when Comcrap and friends start abusing the new lack of meaningful regulation while customers without alternatives will have to happily swallow the abuses.

    Progress!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    DannyB (profile), 7 Jun 2017 @ 6:40am

    Comcast promises

    Comcast also pinky swears that it won't hurt one bit when they sneak in the middle of the night to harvest your and your family's vital organs. You authorized them to do so. Didn't you read the clause about 2/3 of the way through the agreement you signed? It's right there in fine print on page 223 of your service agreement. You authorize Comcast to harvest your and your family's vital organs unless your mobile phone company has already gotten them first.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Jun 2017 @ 7:16am

    when a company/industry swears that customers will be protected and see no changes, you can bet your ass that they wont be protected and there will be monstrous changes, all to the benefit of the company/industry!!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Jun 2017 @ 7:31am

    Mean Girl Busted!

    "Comcast's positions are viciously contradicted"

    Come on, really, you Mean Girl? That's a totally Mean Girl thing to say. Who could say that besides a Mean Girl? Only Mean Girls see Viciousness in other position, come on, are you kidding, Mean Girl?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Pixelation, 7 Jun 2017 @ 7:58am

    Comcast says...

    "I promise not to come in your mouth!"

    Open wide everyone.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Jun 2017 @ 8:43am

    I went over my 1TB CAP last month. I'm paying more for their 200Mbps service and yet have the same 1TB Cap which I just hit that much faster.

    Why doesn't the CAP limit go UP as your speed increases. You pay more money for faster speed, you'r cap should increase long with it.

    With no competition, you have crap like this. To get what I already HAD in the past, Unlimited, I'd have to pay another $50 a month. What a scam.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    ECA (profile), 7 Jun 2017 @ 9:13am

    Capitalist mentality

    SAY WHAT??
    -----
    No contract NO law, means we didnt say it..
    ------
    If corps and Religion EVER got together...
    ======
    WHO here understands Corp law?? If it isnt legally binding, There is nothing that they say, THAT IS BINDING..

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Chip, 7 Jun 2017 @ 9:48am

    I TOLD YOU SO

    I TOLD all you sycophantic idiots that this would happeN! I told you that elections exist, over and over again, and none of you praised me enough for my obvious brilliance and insight! Well, who's praising me now? That's right, me!

    All regulations are bad! I should be allowed to use DDT while watching the lake burn and eating delicious, delicious paint chips if I wanna!

    Every Nation eats the paint Chips it Deserves!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 7 Jun 2017 @ 12:55pm

      Re: I TOLD YOU SO

      Considering 2 out of 3 (possibly all 3) screws over lives in a major way, no you shouldn't.

      your statement makes no sense. If you are the one praising yourself (and possibly the only one), what stops you from doing that anyway?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Thad, 7 Jun 2017 @ 2:37pm

        Re: Re: I TOLD YOU SO

        You...
        ...
        ...Jesus. Really?

        There's Poe's Law, and then there's reading "delicious, delicious paint chips" and not recognizing that it is a joke.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Jun 2017 @ 12:58pm

    How's that cord cutting going?


    LOL

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Dave, 7 Jun 2017 @ 1:16pm

    The headline is slightly wrong. It should say, "Comcast Pinky Swears That The Death Of Net Neutrality Won't Hurt It In The Slightest".

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    DarkKnight (profile), 8 Jun 2017 @ 4:20am

    #REALLY??

    Maybe Comcast should focus on why their TV, Internet, and Phone services all went down and took hours to be restored Monday and Tuesday of this week and a couple of days, last week. They haven't provided any answers on why this happend. Perhaps it has something to do with their recent Wireless Services deal with Verizon and Charter Cable?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Home Cooking Is Killing Restaurants
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.