With 42,000 Layoffs Since 2017, AT&T Plans Thousands More Layoffs At HBO, Time Warner

from the highly-innovative dept

Since 2017, AT&T has received not only a $42 billion tax break courtesy of the Trump administration, but billions more in regulatory favors from the Trump FCC, including the repeal of net neutrality, the erosion of much of the FCC's authority to police natural telecom monopolies, and the elimination of broadband-specific privacy rules. In exchange, AT&T promised thousands of "high paying jobs" and a massive spike in investment. Instead, AT&T fired more than 42,000 employees and trimmed its overall 2020 investment. It's nice work if you can get it.

And AT&T's not done yet. AT&T spent roughly $175 billion DirecTV and Time Warner mergers thinking it could buy its way to streaming video domination. But that's not working out so hot, and AT&T's now doing everything in power to trim its balance sheet. That includes plans to sell DirecTV for a huge loss, and thousands more layoffs across Time Warner, HBO, and other recently acquired properties:

"AT&T's WarnerMedia is restructuring its workforce as it seeks to reduce costs by as much as 20 percent as the coronavirus pandemic drains income from movie tickets, cable subscriptions and television ads, according to people familiar with the matter. The overhaul, which is expected to begin in the coming weeks, would result in thousands of layoffs across Warner Bros. studios and TV channels like HBO, TBS and TNT, the people said.

COVID will provide cover for AT&T, but these layoffs had already been in the works after investor backlash at AT&T's merger mania. COVID will also create cover for the fact that this is all stuff that opponents of the AT&T Time Warner merger repeatedly warned would happen before being promptly ignored by regulators at the FCC and elsewhere. These mindless megadeals always come bearing ample promises about next-level innovation, right before delivering layoffs and higher prices for consumers and competitors alike.

The company's promise that the deal wouldn't result in price hikes for consumers? False. The company's promise the deal wouldn't result in higher prices for competitors needing access to essential AT&T content like HBO? False. AT&T's promise they wouldn't hide Time Warner content behind exclusivity paywalls? False. The idea that the merger would somehow create more jobs at the company? False. Falsehoods that were all taxpayer subsidized and rubber-stamped thanks to regulatory capture.

This being America, you can expect nobody, on absolutely any level of punditry, press, or government, to learn absolutely anything from this experience.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: fcc, jobs, layoffs, mergers, subsidies, tax break
Companies: at&t


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    ECA (profile), 14 Oct 2020 @ 12:51pm

    I thought the gov.

    Paid off all these corps to KEEP the employees, during the Virus.

    That and,
    Does ATT know what its doing? They buy out other business's they may not know HOW they work, and then gets rid of all the workers?
    Does ATT know whats its doing?(doubt it)

    Isnt there a post about ATT selling at a loss, one of its holdings?
    I still think its a scam, to buy at a high price then bankrupt the whole system, and reset all of its Banknotes.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Oct 2020 @ 1:29pm

    Let the beast die.
    It will feed the earth.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      ECA (profile), 14 Oct 2020 @ 11:32pm

      Re:

      but wasnt that the Plan in the first place.
      Buy at outrageous prices, Then Show its a loss, Sell off everything at a loss, and then take it off the taxes for the next 5-10 years.
      And since the Bankruptcy is for the 1 corp, the other that bought it at CHEAP prices, dont have to pay anything from the First purchase.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Darkness Of Course (profile), 14 Oct 2020 @ 10:58pm

    Movie theaters sure.

    But COVID-19 pandemic draining income from movie tickets, cable subscriptions and television ads?

    Movies, okay we're not going to the movies. But, we watch them over cable. And many TV shows are being binged, some of which have ads.

    Either AT&T doesn't know which side their bread is buttered on, or they are just as stupid as they were when they had the American phone monopoly.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      PaulT (profile), 15 Oct 2020 @ 12:08am

      Re: Movie theaters sure.

      "Movies, okay we're not going to the movies. But, we watch them over cable. And many TV shows are being binged, some of which have ads."

      Well, it makes a little sense although I think they're just using the pandemic to cover for business failures.

      Cord cutting is happening at an increasing rate, and while the cable companies have ISP monopolies in many place, a lot of people are choosing to cut the cable TV part. This means lower viewership, which means they can't get as much money from ads to play to a reduced audience. They try to make this up with subscriptions, but HBO is a big mess at the moment, while selling to 3rd party streaming services obviously still means less ad revenue.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 15 Oct 2020 @ 6:38am

        Re: Re: Movie theaters sure.

        I was gonna say:
        "Cable cutting -- there FTFY"
        but I see you already fixed it yourself later in your comment.

        I thought Ma-Bell was busted up in the Eighties, so why is Ma-Bell still such a conglomerate now? Hopefully US legislators learned something from the supposed Ma-Bell breakup, as they attempt to break up Google and the like now.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          PaulT (profile), 15 Oct 2020 @ 7:05am

          Re: Re: Re: Movie theaters sure.

          "I thought Ma-Bell was busted up in the Eighties, so why is Ma-Bell still such a conglomerate now?"

          Because the US has woeful oversight of private corporations, who tend to buy the laws they are meant to obey. Countries that have effective regulation have avoided this problem.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        nerdrage (profile), 15 Oct 2020 @ 9:29am

        Re: Re: Movie theaters sure.

        HBO Max should be getting subscribers hand over fist. Netflix and Disney don't seem to be having any difficulties but that may be because thy know what they're doing. AT&T is badly run and has no clue how to monetize their Time Warner acqusition.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Karl's Bode, 15 Oct 2020 @ 6:56am

    AT&T is a big evil corporation that has made mistakes, yes, but I love how articles like these completely gloss over the evolution of the business.

    TimeWarner ran each of their divisions as separate companies with their own support staff. They have relied on making movies and linear cable networks. TW would not have survived on its previous path in the industry without adapting to the new world of streaming.

    AT&T combining media groups and shifting to streaming is what all of the other media companies are focused on- Paramount +, Peacock, Disney+. All of these companies have streamlined their staff and shifted focus.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      nerdrage (profile), 15 Oct 2020 @ 9:30am

      Re: then why did HBO Max flop?

      AT&T had their chance to prove that they knew what they're doing in streaming with HBO Max, which flopped. With everyone stuck at home and getting bored of the options on Netflix and Disney+, this is the best possible environment for a steaming service to launch. There is no excuse for HBO Max to flop, other than incompetent management.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        PaulT (profile), 15 Oct 2020 @ 11:31pm

        Re: Re: then why did HBO Max flop?

        "There is no excuse for HBO Max to flop, other than incompetent management."

        I listen to multiple podcasts from the US, and one of the themes on many of them running up to the launch of HBO Max was massive amounts of confusion about what the service would actually offer compared to the several other HBO streaming options that were already available. Since launch, the themes have been annoyance over some aspects of the UI, and difficulty getting access to the product at all due to some arcane nonsense involving cable subscription.

        So, while anecdotal, it certainly does seem to be the case that the service has been handled very badly despite people actually wanting to use it.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Special Affiliate Offer

Essential Reading
Techdirt Insider Chat
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.