Wyze Breach Leaves Data Of 2.4 Million Users Exposed Online

from the watching-you-watching-me dept

Another day, another company leaving massive troves of consumer data openly accessible to the internet.

One of the darlings of the holiday tech marketing season was Wyze Labs, which provides significantly cheaper ($20) in home internet-enabled cameras compared to competitors like Ring. While both Wirecutter and CNN put Wyze's cheap camera on their holiday must buy shopping lists, the company's customers got more than they bargained for under the tree this Christmas.

The folks at Twelve Security discovered that camera information, Wi-Fi network details, email addresses, Alexa tokens, and even biometric data of 2.4 million customers was inadvertently left available to the open internet from December 6 to December 27. Security researcher "Ghost" stated he'd "never encountered a breach of this magnitude," and noted that a significant, major breach had already impacted the same company about six months ago. A second post by the firm notes how the cameras are largely just rebranded Xiaomi cameras from China, funneling much of this collected data back to Alibaba cloud servers.

Wyze, which sells the cameras largely through its relationship with Amazon, told the New York Times that an "employee error" was to thank for the massive breach:

"The first Wyze breach occurred after an employee created a flexible database to quickly pull user analytics, such as camera connectivity rates, user growth and the number of devices connected per user, Mr. Crosby said.

That employee removed the security protocols on the new database, exposing customers’ personal information. Customers’ passwords were not saved on the breached database, so hackers could not access live camera feeds, said Dongsheng Song, a co-founder at Wyze."

Yeah, whoops. Prompted by the data leak, the company began a complete head to toe security audit (why this hadn't already been done isn't clear) and found another, second breach on December 27 -- the details of which haven't yet been made public and continues to be investigated by the company. On the plus side, the company at least acknowledged the need to do better, which doesn't always happen:

"“We didn’t properly communicate and enforce our security protocols to new employees,” Mr. Song said. “We should have built controls, or a more robust tool and process to make sure security protocols are followed,” he added. Wyze executives said that the employee who made the mistake is still employed at the company. “It was an accident,” Mr. Crosby said. “We are very, very sorry and taking it very seriously."

Most IOT vendors don't prioritize privacy or security because it erodes revenues. The consumers who buy these products only care about cheap tech. And government regulators remain uninterested in seriously penalizing companies that fail to secure their systems. As such, the breach highlights why in this vacuum there's such a growing push to begin including security and privacy warnings in user hardware reviews so consumers are at least fleetingly aware of the companies they're getting into bed with.

But it also again highlights how dumb tech (like say, a dog) often remains the smarter option.

Filed Under: data breach, iot, security
Companies: wyze


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Bt Garner (profile), 3 Jan 2020 @ 6:54am

    I guess we now know why they were so much cheaper, I mean, security experts are expensive, right?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Jan 2020 @ 6:56am

    Wyze cameras aren't funneling data to Alibaba cloud servers, that part has already been refuted. You should update the article accordingly.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Jan 2020 @ 6:59am

    Something that i find very disturbing and not just with Wyze is that governments want everyone, everywhere to use cloud storage for everything. Considering the frequency of this type of 'Data Breach', the danger to privacy and freedom is obvious just as it is also just as obvious why governments want us to use these services. Forcing the storage companies to build 'backdoors' giving governments and their security forces constant access to everyone while denying keeping any data themselves is like having Xmas everyday!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Jeremy Lyman (profile), 3 Jan 2020 @ 7:20am

    My dog is notoriously unreliable in explaining how the bag of treats was removed from the shelf, opened, and emptied.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Ahsan Ah,ed, 3 Jan 2020 @ 8:37am

    Wyze cameras aren't funneling data to Alibaba cloud servers, that part has already been refuted. You should update the article accordingly.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Jan 2020 @ 8:49am

    Wyze Breach Leaves Data Of 2.4 Million Users Exposed Online

    That is not very wise of them.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 3 Jan 2020 @ 9:44am

      Re: Wyze Breach Leaves Data Of 2.4 Million Users Exposed Online

      If only people were required to suicide for honor over fuckups of such magnitude.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 3 Jan 2020 @ 10:10am

        Re: Re: Wyze Breach Leaves Data Of 2.4 Million Users Exposed Onl

        Not much of a joking matter there; extreme workaholicism and some of the highest rates of suicide in the world are the dark side of modern Japanese tech dominance.

        People make mistakes. It's part of being human. Why crucify people for mistakes that they acknowledge and attempt to fix, when there are people out there (looking specifically at you, Ring) who do similar things intentionally, and cover it up or lie about it?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 3 Jan 2020 @ 10:25am

        Re: Re: Wyze Breach Leaves Data Of 2.4 Million Users Exposed Onl

        I guess the joke was not funny

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    bhull242 (profile), 3 Jan 2020 @ 3:32pm

    I gotta agree with the guy saying how unprecedented this is. That it went unaddressed for three weeks is inexcusable.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Close

Add A Reply

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here



Subscribe to the Techdirt Daily newsletter




Comment Options:

  • Use markdown. Use plain text.
  • Remember name/email/url (set a cookie)

Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.