HideTechdirt is off for the long weekend! We'll be back with our regular posts tomorrow.
HideTechdirt is off for the long weekend! We'll be back with our regular posts tomorrow.

More Prosecutors Abusing Their Access And Power To Illegally Eavesdrop On Conversations

from the give-'em-enough-leash dept

Last time we checked in with (former) Brooklyn prosecutor Tara Lenich, she was facing state charges for abusing wiretap warrants to listen in on conversations between a police detective and one of her colleagues. This stemmed from what was termed a "personal entanglement" between her and the detective.

The wiretap warrants couldn't be obtained without a judge's signature. Since there was no probable cause for the warrant, no judge would sign them. Lenich had a solution. She just forged the judge's signature on the warrant. And then she kept forging judges' signatures, stretching out her illicit surveillance for more than a year, with a faked signature on every 30-day renewal.

Lenich is now facing federal charges. An indictment handed down by DOJ pretty much repeats the allegation of the state charges, detailing Lenich's long-running, extremely-personal wiretap operation.

As alleged in the indictment, for nearly 16 months between approximately June 2015 and November 2016, Lenich created fraudulent judicial orders as part of her illegal wiretapping scheme. Specifically, she forged the signatures of multiple New York State judges onto the illicitly created judicial orders -- orders that purportedly authorized the KCDA to intercept communications occurring over two cellular telephones. Lenich then misappropriated KCDA equipment to intercept, monitor, and record the communications to and from the two cellular telephones. In furtherance of her scheme, Lenich also created fraudulent search warrants, which she then used to unlawfully obtain text messages relating to the two cellular telephones.

Prosecutors have plenty of power and plenty of tools at their disposal. At some point, they'll be abused. Sometimes the damage is minimal and goes unnoticed. Other times, the abuse is discovered inadvertently. Inevitably, when the discovery is made, it's always something that's been happening for months or years, rather than a recent one-off where someone just made a very poor decision.

This time it's federal prosecutors who may be facing charges for illegal eavesdropping. It's not just a few prosecutors and a few isolated cases of misconduct. As Justin Glawe reports for The Daily Beast, it's an entire prosecutors' office and a whole lot of illegal activity.

A court-appointed investigator has found that the United States Attorney’s Office for Kansas is in possession of hundreds of phone and video recordings of communications between attorneys and their clients, inmates at a privately run prison facility in Leavenworth.

At least 700 attorneys are believed to have been recorded without their knowledge, the investigator’s report submitted to a federal court said. Last week Special Master David Cohen asked to expand his probe to determine whether prosecutors regularly listened to and compiled attorney-client conversations. Already, 227 phone call recordings and at least 30 videos of attorney-client meetings have been discovered in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Kansas City.

These recordings, captured by Securus equipment and obtained by prosecutors from private prison company CoreCivic, contained privileged conversations between inmates and their legal representatives. The US Attorney's dirty little eavesdropping secret was exposed when it hauled in a defense lawyer to accuse her of wrongdoing.

Jackie Rokusek told The Daily Beast she was called to the U.S. Attorney’s office in Kansas City last August, where she said she was told by prosecutors that they had video evidence of her providing her client with confidential information about a drug ring case. Rokusek was given a computer and she watched the video, then she says she accidentally clicked on another file. A window opened, and a video showing another attorney meeting with their client at Leavenworth played. Stunned, Rokusek immediately went to the Federal Public Defender’s office in Kansas City and told them what she’d found.

Prosecutors were hoping to push Rokusek towards recusing herself from a case with this supposedly-damning recording. Instead, it showed federal prosecutors had been listening in on discussions between defense attorneys and their clients and possibly using these to stack the prosecution deck.

It's common knowledge prison phone calls and personal visits are recorded. Signs are posted prominently in prisons informing inmates and visitors of this fact. But just because recordings exist doesn't mean prosecutors can avail themselves of privileged conversations between lawyers and clients. Everything else is fair game.

But the recordings do exist. Securus and CoreCivic aren't going to shut off cameras and mics simply because there's a lawyer involved. And if the recordings exist, sooner or later someone's going to abuse this access. The only side that has this access is the prosecution. The side with the most power can eavesdrop with the willing assistance of those in the incarceration business. If they're careful, this abuse could go on indefinitely. If not, they'll enjoy a good run of slanted prosecutions before the hammer falls.


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Andy, 28 Mar 2017 @ 10:27am

    Wow

    I guess the most disturbing part of this for me is that the only oversight in issuing a wiretap is the swipe of a pen.

    I mean, isn't that a tad crazy? No other approval or over site. "Oh, that piece of paper has a scribble on it? Go ahead! Violate the privacy of whoever you want! Nice penmanship, btw"

    Gross, man. Our gvmnt is so f'd up it's ridiculous.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 28 Mar 2017 @ 3:02pm

      Re: Wow

      "the only oversight in issuing a wiretap is the swipe of a pen."

      And nobody bothers to check on who's holding the pen.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 29 Mar 2017 @ 1:41am

      Re: Wow

      Oh thats just unfair, after all it was an expert forgery. As mentioned in another article she

      physically cut a copy of each such judge's signature from a legitimate document and taped the signature onto the fraudulent documents she had created.

      Who could ever see through this?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Mar 2017 @ 10:27am

    Sounds like the KCDA is in for a world of hurt

    Every single case handled by this office for the past few years is going to have to be reviewed. In the large number of cases where proof of prosecutor malfeasance is self evident, civil rights abuse awards will be hundreds of millions at least. Everyone else is most likely going to be released due to the loss of trust in everything that has come out of that place.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 28 Mar 2017 @ 2:54pm

      Re: Sounds like the KCDA is in for a world of hurt

      Every single case handled by this office for the past few years is going to have to be reviewed.

      I seriously doubt that will happen.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        JoeCool (profile), 28 Mar 2017 @ 4:07pm

        Re: Re: Sounds like the KCDA is in for a world of hurt

        Yeah, some peon in the chain somewhere will simply forge a signature on a form stating everything was reviewed and smells like roses.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 29 Mar 2017 @ 11:11am

      Re: Sounds like the KCDA is in for a world of hurt

      >Every single case handled by this office for the past few years is going to have to be reviewed.

      There was a similar situation a few years ago where a lab technician in MA was found to have been falsifying drug samples for years. They are still trying to sort out the mess she made.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Rana, 30 Mar 2017 @ 11:42am

        Re: Re: Sounds like the KCDA is in for a world of hurt

        They are still trying to sort out the mess she made.

        But not real hard.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Anon E. Mous (profile), 28 Mar 2017 @ 10:48am

    The web one weaves when they practice to decieve

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Ninja (profile), 29 Mar 2017 @ 3:38am

    At the very least it seems she will be punished which should be a no brainer but it's actually a relief. Govt employees being held accountable for their misdeeds is a rare species nowadays.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Lance Migliaccio, 31 May 2017 @ 11:25pm

    SECURUS WIRETAPPING VIOLATION OF INMATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

    I have information concerning SECURUS and tha actual issue concerning attorney client privileged communications. The recent release from INTERCEPT is incorrect this has been going on with SECURUS since their inception. Take a look at U.S. vs Novak. The issue is much larger than anyone is talking about. In every facility in all state and federal cases that SECURUS provides service the discs for different inmates are ordered in 5-10% of all cases.

    Every time the software was updated, even if any blocks had been placed to restrict recording, the blocks were wiped out for all attorneys and all privileged employees paralegals and private investigators working on cases across the entire country.

    Across the country US Attorneys, State Attorneys, Alphabet agencies all received these calls and in not one case of them receiving privileged communications did they report it to SECURUS, the defendants council, or the Courts. Committing fraud on the courts in every case. In Colorado their has been a pattern of intentionally placing difficult cases and high profile cases by the US Attorneys office in SECURUS phone service facilities. I wonder why? This issue litterally effects 1,000’s of defendants in every state that SECURUS provides services to in both State and Federal facilities.

    I can provide a list of Law Enforcement individuals including one ex FBI employee that if deposed can confirm all of the above. This problem has been going on much longer than 2011. It goes back to at least 2006. They were aware of problem in US vs Novak 2006, again they were notified in 2009/2010, and now once again. This is called a pattern and history of abuse. This is the largest violation of prisoner rights, civil rights, and wire tapping violations, it is also Fraud on the Courts in every case state or federal that it occurred in.

    If you would like to discuss further please feel free to contact me. Otherwise I plan to discuss with Plaintiffs counsel and the press.
    Lance C. Migliaccio

    720.380.0059


    lm@grpfusion.com

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Techdirt Logo Gear
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.