Culture

by Timothy Geigner


Filed Under:
blackouts, sports, streaming

Companies:
mlb, nfl



Both The NFL And MLB Look To Expand Streaming Offerings By Ending Local Blackouts

from the bye-bye-cable dept

Bear witness to the genesis of a new era, fellow sports fans. I've begged and pleaded in the past for the major professional sports leagues to take the harness off of the ability to stream games. Even as the trend of cord-cutting has progressed along nicely, I have always argued that the only dam keeping a flood of cord-cutters at bay has been professional sports broadcast deals. Those deals have almost universally been saddled with local blackout restrictions, making streaming games all but useless for the majority of fans. The past few years, however, have seen inched progress towards wider availabitily for streamed offerings. The NBA's most recent contract went out of its way to make sure streaming is expanded, for instance, not to mention the deal Dish and ESPN made to make the cable channel's broadcasts more accessible for streaming. But those were baby steps, too often leashed by a cable subscription requirement.

But, now, the NFL is finally dipping its toe in the streaming waters. Please understand that, even if this is just another inch gained for streaming, this is a huge deal.

On Monday, the NFL announced the Oct. 25 regular season game between Jacksonville and Buffalo will be put up for bid on national digital platforms. The game is being played in London, meaning the broadcast will begin at 9:30 a.m. ET and 6:30 PT. That's not exactly prime time for U.S. fans, or broadcast television, but it is 'prime time' in China, where the NFL is struggling to gain a toehold.

"It's a one game test. We will evaluate fan feedback," NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said via an email exchange. "It's too early to tell about the future [of streaming games]. Will test this season with the one game and evaluate after."

Separately, the NFL said it's going to drop its so-called blackout rule, which prevents local broadcasts of games if they're not sold out 72 hours before kickoff. NFL media executive Brian Rolapp said the league is "testing alternative ways to distribute games," The NYT reports, and acknowledged the obvious: "The world is changing very quickly."
If this seems like a small step, you don't know how savvy the folks in the NFL's media department are. They absolutely know where the trends have us all heading regarding media consumption and I can promise you they are keenly aware of how many people are currently watching streaming NFL games on illegitimate sites. The most consumed sport in the United States doesn't turn on a dime, but the league also doesn't put up this kind of test balloon without having a fairly certain idea of how it's going to play with its customers. Assuming the quality, cost (free?), and accessibility of this test game is anything remotely comparable to, say, baseball's MLB.TV offering, expect this to end up as an insanely successful test-run. I'd actually say that this test game feels more like the NFL looking for an excuse to jump fully into a streaming offering than some kind of fact-finding mission. After all, you only drop the blackout rule in conjunction with expanding streaming if you expect the locals to run with the offering full-force. And they will, I assure you.

The NFL's DirectTV and network deals mean streaming won't explode immediately, but everyone can see what the NFL is doing to position itself for the future.
Given its agreement with DirecTV and television networks -- the NFL signed $27 billion worth of contracts in 2011 -- the league will be restricted on what it can offer online, at least in the near term. But the NFL is "a master of dicing and splicing content in order to extract the greatest value," [media analyst Walt] Piecyk says. "It's not like they're committing to put a bunch of games [online] but I think they want to get more comfortable so if Google or Apple or Amazon comes down the pike and says 'we want to buy a larger chunk of games' they can get comfortable on tech front."
And speaking of MLB.TV, reports are that professional baseball is due to get its own expanded streaming offering. The MLB.TV service has long been the standard in sports streaming, with no other league offering really even coming close. The problem, however, was that local games were blacked out, so the service was only useful for out-of-town fans or die-hard baseball fans that will watch any MLB game any time it's available (me, for example). If recent reports are to be believed, however, MLB is looking to take a small step to changing the blackout rules for streaming.
Major League Baseball is expected to announce in the next few days a deal with a national distributor, like a wireless provider, to stream local games of every MLB team, a source close to the situation said Thursday.

To stream games of the New York teams, fans would have to be a customer of the distributor and pay for the YES Network or SNY, the regional sports networks (RSNs) that carry Yank and Met games, respectively. The price to stream has not yet been set.
This is an imperfect first step, of course, particularly as it carries with it the anchor of either a cable subscription, a specific wireless device provider, or both, but it's an important step in the right direction. It's something akin, actually, to the DirectTV deal the NFL has, except that it's more mobile and more widely available on a variety of devices. You should also expect any deal MLB signs for this streaming to be less locked in than the NFL/DirectTV deal, because, again, everyone knows where this is all heading. And, if the reports are true, even the television broadcasters are resigning themselves to reality.
Talks between MLB and Fox Sports, which owns 15 RSNs, including YES; Comcast, which owns six, including a minority stake in SNY; and DirecTV, which owns four, have been on-again, off-again for more than a year. The talks have accelerated in the last two weeks, and both sides are optimistic a deal will be reached before Opening Day, April 6. Under that agreement, fans would deal directly with their pay-TV provider.
Is it as perfect a solution as simply working out deals to unleash the local broadcasts on the MLB.TV stream that customers have been watching all the non-local teams on? No, absolutely not, but this first iteration's imperfection will only catalyze MLB to go the correct route in the future. Because the trends are clear: streaming is up and cable subscriptions are down. Even if the NFL and MLB don't get this right the first time, they will absolutely be forced to get it right in the near future.

Either way, one eventual reality is coming ever-closer to fruition: cable television, and perhaps television as a whole, may soon be over.


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Mar 2015 @ 7:41pm

    About the only sports I used to like was pro-football. Blackouts meant I couldn't follow the local team for my area and living a 100 miles away meant I sure wasn't going to there for a friggin' ticket. So finally I gave up on it and that was years ago. Today I couldn't tell you the names of the teams or who coaches them. Know something else? I no longer care. I don't watch football any more and that was one of the driving reasons why. I'm a cord cutter now and I just no longer have any desire to know about the sport. It's over and done with, let it rest in peace cause I don't miss it.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Atkray (profile), 28 Mar 2015 @ 8:45am

    Doomed to fail

    While I welcome this move I anticipate it will fail.
    In their typical fashion I anticipate they will severely underestimate the audience resulting in the servers crashing shortly after kickoff. By time they bring enough capacity back on line late in the third quarter, potential viewers will have moved on.

    The NFL will then declare:
    1: The technology is not yet ready.
    2: Even if the technology was ready there is no market.


    They will then fire the 3 engineers who dare to tell them "I told you this would happen" and then place their heads back in the sand for anther decade or two.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Ninja (profile), 28 Mar 2015 @ 12:57pm

    Either way, one eventual reality is coming ever-closer to fruition: cable television, and perhaps television as a whole, may soon be over.

    And won't be missed! Hello free spectrum for wireless use!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Violynne (profile), 30 Mar 2015 @ 3:15am

    National Football Luddites.

    Honestly, they can keep their streams. The fact it took them this long to remove blackouts (and that's only because the FCC pretty much forced them to) clearly shows this isn't about giving fans what they want.

    When they do stream, the backlash will be tremendous. It's not going to go the way people think it will.

    This is the NFL we're talking about. Have they done anything right lately?

    Personal note: I'm really appalled anyone would still find this sport appealing, given it should be more aptly called the National Felony League.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 30 Mar 2015 @ 5:14am

    If I already pay for the YES network, why should I pay more to stream the games? I shouldn't have to pay twice for the same content. The team has already been paid for my right to view their broadcast. Time to end double-dipping...

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    TANSTaaFL (profile), 30 Mar 2015 @ 7:14am

    MLB blackouts

    The blackouts in MLB are by far the worst. I live in Charlotte, NC. we have no major league team in the state. The closest MLB team is the Atlanta Braves (250 miles away). So, you would think blackout rules would not be an issue - you'd be wrong. If I buy the MLB package (I follow the Cubs) I am blacked out of games in 4 markets. You heard that right - 4 market blackouts even when I pay for the streaming service. MLB considers North Carolina to be part of Atlanta (I'm fine with that one), DC, Baltimore and Cincinnati. Yes, Charotte is considered part of the Cincinnati market for baseball games (a 7 hour drive and nearly 500 miles away). So, The Cubs play 162 games and I will be blacked out of at least 32 games (~20%) plus any games on ESPN and any Fox saturday day games. So, for $125+ I would get blacked out of close to 35% of all cub games plus (if I wanted to watch other games) all Braves, Nationals, Orioles and Reds games too.

    The government protected and subsidized monopolies we call major sports leagues like to view themselves as fan friendly, community-engaged suppliers of a highly desired product. The are correct about only the last bit and act more like Comcast or TWC in markets where they lack any competition in their level of concern for customer satisfaction. I have been a die-hard baseball and NFL football fan my whole life and was the kind of person who would organize huge parts of my life around not missing games, but years of frustration with both the declining quality of the entertainment and the downright disdain and disrespect shown to the fans and their experience I am for the first time finding myself willing to miss watching games, turning down tickets and buying way less merchandise. I do not think I am alone in this.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      TANSTaaFL (profile), 30 Mar 2015 @ 7:17am

      Re: MLB blackouts

      Sorry for all the run-ons. It is a consequence of stepping on my soapbox and ranting.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      wizard7926, 30 Mar 2015 @ 12:28pm

      Re: MLB blackouts

      This is perfect, and explains just how archaic and nonsensical the blackout restrictions have become. MLB is arguably the deepest into the pockets of the networks, so it's not a surprise. I'd be more than willing to shell out $125 a season to be able to watch every local game, but I'm not going to pay for a cable package for 6 months just to gain that ability. I'm in the same boat as you - while my Phillies have gone downhill in watchability, I still enjoy baseball.. but the MLB's archaic blackout system has me watching less games and in turn, going to less games and caring less.

      It needs to stop; a lot of fans would be willing to pay a reasonable price to specifically get their team's games.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    trippymanni (profile), 2 Apr 2015 @ 6:34am

    Blackout Workaround

    Well the workaround is rather simple and has always been there. Get a VPN subscription, preferably one that is affordable. Connect to a server in a region other than that which you are physically in and voila.... Blackout message disappers!! I would advise clearing your cache and/or disabling GPS.

    Source : http://www.purevpn.com/blog/mlb-tv-blackout-workaround/

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: Copying Is Not Theft
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.