(I should say, in that case, against view-bots sellers/providers. They are already fighting against the bots them-self in the technical side of thing, and of course against view-bots users, since it is obviously in breach of Twitch ToS)
Remember that NFL already has a season gamepass for some years, that's actually working very nicely. Granted, you have to be outside of the US to enjoy it, but still.
The INPI ("French USPTO") announced today that it had lots wouldn't consider attenpts to trademark "Je suis Charlie". Press release: http://www.inpi.fr/fr/l-inpi/espace-presse/communiques-de-presse/detail-communique/article/marque-je-suis-charlie-5968.html?cHash=29c53578373d677cdc62bca45557f40f
When you put aside the controversy, and focus on pure gameplay: I like the idea. I don't play sports games much, more of a simracer (yeah, yeah, racing guys aren't athletes, I know Donovan...) - but knowing that that I can be fouled (or served a penalty, or earned a $$ fine in a career mode, etc..), yeah, I think it can open up a new whole experience. Maybe helping to feel even more immersed in the game. But - like in any game - if you got the option to turn it off.
As a (amateurish) musician, that's a question i've actually ask myself.
Where Creative Commons fall short is that, contrary to the Open Source/ Free Software movement, as far as music goes, you only release the "binary file" of the music, ie the mp3 / final mix.
Sure, you can "remix" it, but it's hard, and you don't have much room in it.
If I ever release an album, I think I'd like to make all the raw material available too (ie, "the source code"). That is, every instrumental tracks.
The main problem with it is cost. For one song, we're talking between 3 and 15, say 3 or 4 minutes,stereo uncompressed raw .wav file. That is, a ballpark figure of 1 Gb of raw data per song. So, you got to host them, and make them available...
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by haik.
Re: Re:
(I should say, in that case, against view-bots sellers/providers. They are already fighting against the bots them-self in the technical side of thing, and of course against view-bots users, since it is obviously in breach of Twitch ToS)
Re:
They do not - they are not going after cheat-bots, but after view-bots, basically allowing a streamer to boost up his view count
Re: waitamin
Nope, Amazon did.
Re: Doomed to fail
Not so sure.
Remember that NFL already has a season gamepass for some years, that's actually working very nicely.
Granted, you have to be outside of the US to enjoy it, but still.
Re: Re: Might have matched his other application
Yeah, you can use both "Je suis idiot " (as an adjective) and "Je suis un idiot" (as an noun)
Re: INPI
Remove the "had lots" from the sentence for it to makes sense...sorry.
INPI
The INPI ("French USPTO") announced today that it had lots wouldn't consider attenpts to trademark "Je suis Charlie".
Press release:
http://www.inpi.fr/fr/l-inpi/espace-presse/communiques-de-presse/detail-communique/article/marque-je-suis-charlie-5968.html?cHash=29c53578373d677cdc62bca45557f40f
Wow. Gary Kasparov plays the entire Internet?
I want a rematch.
Twitch plays Kasparov -
When you put aside the controversy, and focus on pure gameplay: I like the idea.
I don't play sports games much, more of a simracer (yeah, yeah, racing guys aren't athletes, I know Donovan...) - but knowing that that I can be fouled (or served a penalty, or earned a $$ fine in a career mode, etc..), yeah, I think it can open up a new whole experience. Maybe helping to feel even more immersed in the game.
But - like in any game - if you got the option to turn it off.
Re:
Sorry, should have read the article with both eyes open...
I think the winning tweet was the one from Audi America:
Audi @Audi
Sending some LEDs to the @MBUSA Superdome right now...
(Mercedes-Benz giving its name to the superdome)
Re: Re:
Indeed it does - so do both the Daily Show and the Colbert Report websites (after being inaccessible for a few weeks)...Mysteries
Release Raw Material
As a (amateurish) musician, that's a question i've actually ask myself.
Where Creative Commons fall short is that, contrary to the Open Source/ Free Software movement, as far as music goes, you only release the "binary file" of the music, ie the mp3 / final mix.
Sure, you can "remix" it, but it's hard, and you don't have much room in it.
If I ever release an album, I think I'd like to make all the raw material available too (ie, "the source code"). That is, every instrumental tracks.
The main problem with it is cost. For one song, we're talking between 3 and 15, say 3 or 4 minutes,stereo uncompressed raw .wav file. That is, a ballpark figure of 1 Gb of raw data per song. So, you got to host them, and make them available...