Ferguson's Strategy Regarding Journalists: Charge Insane Fees For FOIA Requests

from the filing-charges dept

Say what you want, but one thing has become abundantly clear since the whole Ferguson debacle began: the people running and policing that city aren't interested in your concerns. Throughout this entire process, the city and its police force have obfuscated the facts and people involved in the shooting of a civilian, they have cynically released information and videos when it suits them, and they've treated journalists covering the story with the kind of contempt they normally reserve for their own constituents. And now, utilizing a method previously beta-tested by both local and federal law enforcement agencies, they've decided the best way to respond to the ongoing outcry is to try to charge insane amounts for FOIA requests.

Officials in Ferguson, Missouri, are charging nearly 10 times the cost of some of their own employees' salaries before they will agree to turn over files under public records laws about the fatal shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown. The city has demanded high fees to produce copies of records that, under Missouri law, it could give away free if it determined the material was in the public's interest to see. Instead, in some cases, the city has demanded high fees with little explanation or cost breakdown.

In one case, it billed The Associated Press $135 an hour — for nearly a day's work — merely to retrieve a handful of email accounts since the shooting. That fee compares with an entry-level, hourly salary of $13.90 in the city clerk's office, and it didn't include costs to review the emails or release them.
Allow that to sink in for a moment and marinade in your brain juices: information that could be given for free if it was of public interest is instead being billed at ridiculously high rates. Does anyone seriously want to argue that more transparency out of the Ferguson government isn't in the public's interest? Of course not. This is all about intimidating journalists and trying to put roadblocks in front of likely damning information. Ferguson has a public relations problem in the truest form and their strategy appears to be to freeze out journalists trying to provide information to the public. That won't win them any friends.

And don't think that this strategy is used rarely.
The Washington Post was told it would need to pay $200 at minimum for its requests, including city officials' emails since Aug. 9 discussing Brown's shooting, citizen complaints against Ferguson officers and Wilson's personnel file. The website Buzzfeed requested in part emails and memos among city officials about Ferguson's traffic-citation policies and changes to local elections, but was told it would cost unspecified thousands of dollars to fulfill.

Inquiries about Ferguson's public records requests were referred to the city's attorney, Stephanie Karr, who declined to respond to repeated interview requests from the AP since earlier this month. Through a spokesman late Monday, Karr said Missouri law can require fees but she didn't address why charges specific to the AP's request were nearly tenfold the lowest salary in the city clerk's office. Karr said searching emails for key words constitutes "extra computer programming" that can bring added costs.
Searching emails by keyword now equals "programming?" Brilliant! Although I suppose it's not as egregious as suggesting shooting unarmed civilians equals "policing."


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Oct 2014 @ 7:52pm

    They need a search function

    The only logical explanation is that they never wrote a search function. Therefore, these extra costs are to cover the cost of hiring programmers to write one on such short notice.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      That One Guy (profile), 3 Oct 2014 @ 8:02pm

      Re: They need a search function

      No, I'm pretty sure the reason is a mix of 'Screw you', and 'Because we can, what are you going to do about it?'

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      tqk (profile), 4 Oct 2014 @ 9:24am

      Re: They need a search function

      Therefore, these extra costs are to cover the cost of hiring programmers to write one on such short notice.

      Or, they could just tell their IT guy to do it. I've had grepmail here for as long as I can remember. Do mortals (the non-IT-clueful) actually not think that we've been doing this sort of stuff forevar!

      The biggest problem in IT is how much lazy people have allowed themselves to forget. We have solutions already worked out and proven robust, which are completely ignored when building the new shiny stuff.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Anonymous Coward, 5 Oct 2014 @ 5:23am

        Re: Re: They need a search function

        "Or, they could just tell their IT guy to do it."

        You are being WAY too generous with your expectations of competence. These types of discussion often get a little out of hand around here, because so many of us TDites are REAL, professional IT with notably above-average intelligence. Public service IT folks rarely own the skills or wit that we do.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    And there is money enough for us to make it go aro, 3 Oct 2014 @ 8:06pm

    Ferguson PD

    The new version of the new speak dictionary doesn't come free.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Some other name, 3 Oct 2014 @ 8:08pm

    So what are you waiting for my comments...

    Are not very long, wait am I terrrooorrriisssst?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Some other name again, 3 Oct 2014 @ 8:11pm

      Re: So what are you waiting for my comments...

      This is hysterical and a point about I hope is automated stuff is, the comment I was complaining about was on point and made sens where as this was pure anger and it got though and the other didn't.

      Mike you need to "upgrade" your terrorist defenses I guess

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        ltlw0lf (profile), 4 Oct 2014 @ 5:00am

        Re: Re: So what are you waiting for my comments...

        This is hysterical and a point about I hope is automated stuff is, the comment I was complaining about was on point and made sens where as this was pure anger and it got though and the other didn't.

        Don't take it personal...he isn't trying to stop terrorists, but Steve the spammer who keeps posting his "I love me" links. You look a lot like Steve, so the server gets confused and has to have a human look into whether you are Steve or just someone who looks like him. They usually get it sorted out pretty quickly.

        Getting an account usually saves you the grief, because the server then knows that you probably aren't Steve, but then you have to worry about the guys with wrenches and crowbars going after you for your password (in case you ever forget yours, this will make a lot more sense...Mike pops up the XKCD security comic whenever you forget your password.)

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Oct 2014 @ 8:15pm

    Why is it that our law enforcement teams, our champions of justice, don't seem to understand what justice means?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      No Use for a Name, 3 Oct 2014 @ 8:22pm

      Re: Failure to understand

      Because people are really really dumb,

      It was said more than 40 years ago...

      Phil Ochs and a better version by Jello biafra and Mojo Nixion

      Love Me Love Me Love me I'm a liberal

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u52Oz-54VYw

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQ8ERBr9yKI

      A person is good moral and thoughtful, people are imaginary and made up by people with guns.

      And most persons are afraid of those people.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      That One Guy (profile), 3 Oct 2014 @ 8:26pm

      Re:

      They've all read too many comics, in particular Judge Dredd, and now firmly believe in the idea of 'I AM the law!' Therefor, if they decide to do something, it by definition is justice, even if us poor, misguided citizens might disagree.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Lotta Libberaalll, 3 Oct 2014 @ 8:32pm

        Re: Re: Judge dredd

        First Judge 100 years is a great song, second its not even that complicated a fantasy it's really Eric Cartman, we put people in positions of military power when they are like 18-20 years old and we wonder why everything looks like high-school?

        This is not some sort of mystery

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      JoeCool (profile), 3 Oct 2014 @ 9:54pm

      Re:

      It's not that they don't know what "justice" means, it's that you don't know what "law" means. The best definition I've come across is "the means by which the rich avoid justice." Given that definition, they're doing their job of "law" enforcement just fine. ;)

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        tqk (profile), 4 Oct 2014 @ 9:39am

        Re: Re:

        What I'd like to know is why in 21st Century USA this isn't just a matter of impeachment/recall/fire the bums? Why isn't that happening?

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          JoeCool (profile), 4 Oct 2014 @ 4:24pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Three reasons: 1) Apathy. As long as "it doesn't affect me", most folks don't care. 2) Money talks. Rich people/companies often go to poor areas and hire people to vote the way they want. 3) Control. Most companies force their employees to vote the way they want, regardless of the law. You don't even have to threaten anyone directly - consider this message from the boss - "I'd love to pass out Christmas bonuses, but if this new law passes/doesn't pass, I'm afraid there won't be any money for bonuses." Guess how employees will vote?

          2 and 3 above can mix a bit, and number 1 more than anything. It's hard to get people to care about anything beyond their little world.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 4 Oct 2014 @ 11:34pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          probably because the whole department of justice is corrupt. So you know what they say. Corruption starts at the top and trickles down. They pick and choose which laws to enforce and which laws to ignore.

          The rule of law has become non existant for the most part in America. Only those that are not viewed as the elite or as part of the police thugs are expected to follow the laws those that enforce them do no care to.

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Oct 2014 @ 8:55pm

    I gather their main source of income is squeezing money from local (black) residents as it is. They're just branching out.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 Oct 2014 @ 8:56pm

    And yet, these tossers were claiming that Micheal Brown was a criminal. Their fees are really insane.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Editor-In-Chief, 3 Oct 2014 @ 9:15pm

    At this point the only conclusion one can come to is that Michael Brown is innocent. He was murdered in cold blood by an official of the local government and now the Ferguson authorities are trying to hide these facts from the general population.

    David Oliver Graeme Samuel Offenbach

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    icon
    Whatever (profile), 3 Oct 2014 @ 9:47pm

    I have to wonder: Are the Tims happy about anything, ever? You guys both tend to sound really pissed off, like a really loud drunk at a party who just got turned down by the last girl in the room.

    In one case, it billed The Associated Press $135 an hour — for nearly a day's work — merely to retrieve a handful of email accounts since the shooting. That fee compares with an entry-level, hourly salary of $13.90 in the city clerk's office, and it didn't include costs to review the emails or release them.

    Sort of an unfair comparison. I don't suspect that they would leave answering such FOIA requests to the lowest paid employee in the place. They also wouldn't let the resulting dataset out without review. The price is high, but it's not particularly out of line when you consider what a short term computer "consultant" would charge to do the same work.

    For what it's worth, they can't just run a keyword search against a bunch of emails and turn it over. That would likely result in relevant emails being missed, and irrelevant or even messages that might get covered as evidence in the investigation getting put out to public. Quite simply, it's not a two minute job that the lowest paid clerk in the building can do.

    I believe you call that a strawman.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      I don't normally feed trols, 3 Oct 2014 @ 10:01pm

      Re: whatever TL:DR

      In one case, it billed The Associated Press $135 an hour — for nearly a day's work — merely to retrieve a handful of email accounts since the shooting. That fee compares with an entry-level, hourly salary of $13.90 in the city clerk's office, and it didn't include costs to review the emails or release them.

      You know that simple math say WTF are you talking about? since 135$ A DAY IS NOT EQUAL TO 135$ AN HOUR DO I HAVE TO KEEP SHOUTING!?

      The person putting up a stawman is not him...

      It's you.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Rikuo (profile), 3 Oct 2014 @ 11:12pm

      Re:

      From the original article on bigstory

      "Ferguson told the AP it wanted nearly $2,000 to pay a consulting firm for up to 16 hours of work to retrieve messages on its own email system,"

      1) Why does retrieving emails take 16 hours?
      2) How could retrieving emails cost $2,000?
      3) Why pay an outside firm to do the work?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      That One Guy (profile), 3 Oct 2014 @ 11:29pm

      Re:

      You quoted the section in question but missed the most important part:

      In one case, it billed The Associated Press $135 an hour — for nearly a day's work — merely to retrieve a handful of email accounts since the shooting. That fee compares with an entry-level, hourly salary of $13.90 in the city clerk's office, and it didn't include costs to review the emails or release them.

      That $135 per hour they were demanding, the $2,000? That was just to retrieve the emails, that didn't include any other costs such as those involved with reviewing them or getting them ready to release.

      Reviewing emails to make sure sensitive information didn't get released? That would take someone skilled and knowledgeable(though even then not $135/hour skilled). Just getting the emails from the system? Minimal skills, minimal knowledge, and most certainly not something more intensive than a $13.90/hour, entry level clerk would be able to handle.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Are you a bob, 4 Oct 2014 @ 1:32am

        Re: Re: Skills

        You have a very low thought of what a clerk should be able to do, it's no wonder America is suffering from a low skill problem, people that graduate from college cannot even do these jobs!

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 4 Oct 2014 @ 7:16am

      Re:

      ... and why are you always apologizing for bad actors, like some paid for mouth piece at a cocktail party who thinks with his dick.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 6 Oct 2014 @ 7:41am

      Re:

      Quite simply, it's not a two minute job that the lowest paid clerk in the building can do.

      Fair enough...now all we need is a FOIA request as to the salary of who actually does the work. Let's see what they make an hour and bounce it against the $135/hour rate.

      If they make better than $100/hour, we call it even.

      If they make $20-30/hour, we all get to call "bullshit" and you can issue the forum an apology.

      Deal?

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    william (profile), 3 Oct 2014 @ 11:35pm

    Come on guys! Isn't it obvious?

    They are not releasing this information for the public interest! There will probably be another mass riot if the citizens found out just how corrupted their police and officials are.

    They are saving you from yourself! It's a thankless job!

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    David, 3 Oct 2014 @ 11:47pm

    Gotta milk it while it lasts

    When you shoot people as a tourist attraction, you owe it to them to make it pay well before it becomes old news.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Oct 2014 @ 1:28am

    Next thing we'll hear is their email server crashed and there isn't any backups.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Rich Kulawiec, 4 Oct 2014 @ 2:54am

    Incompetence as an excuse for stonewalling

    Searching emails by keyword now equals "programming?"

    We keep seeing this tactic over and over again by government entities that don't want to respond to requests. It's becoming increasingly clear that many of them have deliberately chosen inferior email systems (e.g., Exchange, deployed exclusively by ignorant newbies who don't know any better) precisely because they make it difficult to respond to such requests and thus provide plausible justification for delays, omissions, and outrageous fees.

    This is also why responses are often given with all or most metadata (i.e. message headers) removed and/or on paper: the strategy is to make it as difficult as possible to analyze the data in context and to search it.

    Anyone who uses a sensible email system (which of course requires that it runs on Unix or Linux) can respond to such requests with a trivial amount of effort (a) because the mail store is maintained in an open, documented, simple manner that facilitates easy retrieval and searching and (b) because numerous tools exist to extract messages, search messages, process messages, organize messages, redact messages, etc. (A quick glance through the packages available for, let's say, Debian Linux, reveals the wealth of tools available -- and that's only a portion of the whole.)

    I routinely deal with email archives that have 2 to 20 million messages in them and have no problem pulling all messages from a certain data range, or all messages to/from a certain recipient, or all messages with certain keywords in the subject, etc., using no more than the computational resources on laptop -- and not a particularly new or powerful one at that. Nor do I have the slightest difficulty stripping attachments or redacting a phone number or any of the other routine things that might be done in the process of responding to a FOIA request or similar. This is trivial stuff that should be well within the reach of anyone with even just a few years' experience, provided that they haven't crippled themselves with a junk email system and junk tools and proprietary formats.

    But, as I said, I think many of these agencies have deliberately done just that -- crippled themselves -- because it provides cover for their unwillingness to hand the public's documents over to the public.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      PRMan, 4 Oct 2014 @ 6:24am

      Re: Incompetence as an excuse for stonewalling

      If you are done praising almighty Linux, you might want to know that getting that information from an Exchange server takes about 5 seconds.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        David, 4 Oct 2014 @ 7:57am

        Re: Re: Incompetence as an excuse for stonewalling

        If you have a clue what you are doing. Most users of office applications don't.

        WYSIWYG applications principally have the disadvantage of pitching to a "who needs manuals?" crowd. The programmers might start out structuring menus and stuff to correspond with a structured approach of creating documents. Then the Human Interface Group surveys what actually gets used frequently and groups it separately. Or the computer sees itself what is frequently in use and spews it to the top.

        As a result, the interface then is strongly organized for favoring cluelessness, no longer reflecting any significant amount of inherent logic.

        You have to put up an active fight to figure out the logic that the programmers intended. Most people don't and would not even know where to start and why.

        As a result, the efficiency of a task like specific retrieval is bounded by how fast you'll be able to collect the information when cluelessly clicking around rather than a systematic approach and proper search criteria.

        Almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

        • icon
          That One Guy (profile), 4 Oct 2014 @ 11:59am

          Re: Re: Re: Incompetence as an excuse for stonewalling

          If you have a clue what you are doing. Most users of office applications don't.

          Okay, now how easy is it to do that data retrieval if you have no clue how to use a Linux system?

          You're setting the skill-levels differently to try and prove your point. Of course a particular program will be difficult to use if you don't know what you're doing, the question is how do they compare if you're talking about skilled users knowledgeable in the program in question?

          reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 4 Oct 2014 @ 1:14pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re: Incompetence as an excuse for stonewalling

            In general, GUI based programs are more limited in their capabilities than command line programs, and it is much much harder to talk someone through a GUI solution than it is to give them a command to execute. With a powerful program, even experts will not be familiar with all its capabilities, so the ability to find useful examples, or use IRC or forums is still part of problem solving, and this much easier with command line tools as actual examples can be given, while a GUI requires describing menu navigation an dialogue options, and/or posting screen shots.

            reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Rich Kulawiec, 6 Oct 2014 @ 3:31am

        Re: Re: Incompetence as an excuse for stonewalling

        Actually, I was extolling the virtues of open source in general, including operating systems and applications such as mail systems. (I'm partial to OpenBSD over Linux, by the way.)

        5 seconds? Hmmm. Fascinating. Please explain how to do the functional equivalent of the following rather trivial prototype/proof-of-concept code on an Exchange server:

        find /var/mail -type f -exec grepmail -h "^From.*John Smith" | grepmail -h "Ferguson" | sed -e "s/Mary Smith/XXXX XXXXX/g" -e "s/312-555-1212/XXX-XXX-XXXX/g" > mbox.out

        That searches a mail store set up as one-message-per-file or in mbox format (both common architectures but of course by no means the only ones), extracts all messages from John Smith and containing Ferguson in the headers or body, then redacts Mary Smith's name and phone number and deposits the results in a single mbox file. Obviously more sophisticated regular expressions would be required for real-world use, but this does illustrate how the combination of open formats, open OS and open source tools can be quickly utilized to construct (at least) a first-order solution to problems like this one.

        This kind of scripting should of course be well within the grasp of any 'nix mail system administrator with a few years of experience: it's not something that requires guru-level expertise. Of course run time will be (roughly) proportional to the size of the mail store (in messages and in bytes) but since it can be run in the background, the human time required is only that necessary to craft the script(s) and then tweaks the regexps.

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      art guerrilla (profile), 6 Oct 2014 @ 7:14am

      Re: Incompetence as an excuse for stonewalling

      @ rich k-
      i think you are giving the evil minions of doom too much credit...
      i *seriously* doubt they choose an email system based on how difficult it may be to retrieve emails, etc...
      i am pretty sure there are a number of other confounding factors that are at play:
      1. whatever was there... (never underestimate bureaucratic inertia)
      2. whatever one of the big cheeses wants... ('i hear tell that XYZ email is the best, my nephew says so...')
      3. whatever one of the big cheeses gets a kickback from buying/specifying...
      NOT that i don't doubt that evil minions of doom WOULD do some underhanded crap like that to avoid accountability; its just that i don't think they are far-sighted and smart enough to actually *plan* something like that...
      that they can point to a crap email system for 'why' they supposedly can't retrieve emails easily, is an 'undocumented feature', not the original intention...
      the evil minions of doom operate mostly ad hoc, not only are they generally not that smart, they DON'T HAVE TO BE... they simply call upon bullying by law, or otherwise ignoring requests with impunity; no need to be clever when you have a'because mother fucking eagles!' sledgehammer to hit everyone with whenever you want...

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Oct 2014 @ 5:52am

    If the city had hired an outside firm to come in and do the work, paying $135/hr for a technical specialist would not have been out of line. What's important is whether they're actually getting their money's worth in documents, rather than paying someone to burn up clock hours all day long and in the end not produce anything. (think of the $15 million it supposedly cost to attempt to recover the Bush White House "lost" emails)

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Avatar, 4 Oct 2014 @ 6:14am

    Our firm actually does this, all day long.

    Couple grand to have a guy come on-site and perform a forensic collection of a bunch of e-mail is completely in-line with normal industry prices. Then it would cost additional for us to process the documents into a database and set it up for the department's review, so they could figure out "okay, these are the e-mails we're obliged to turn over, here are e-mails we aren't, here's more e-mails with swimsuit pics wtf Officer Skeevy!"

    Then actual lawyers gotta look at the stuff.

    This stuff is expensive because you're not just saying "okay here's the e-mail", you're saying "if you need us to, we will send someone to get up on the stand and explain to the judge how we did this, how we're sure we got everything, and how we're sure that this is really the true stuff and not a pack of lies they cooked up to look good." You can go with a little fly-by-night company on the cheap, but if the other side challenges the work and they get up on the stand and go "derp", you can lose million-dollar court cases.

    (Or if they just blow it, the judge can say "guess what law firm, I just charged you a hundred thousand bucks for sucking. Suck less!" I've seen sanctions higher than that, even.)

    It IS hella expensive; sometimes we've had people drop cases because it would cost more to have us satisfy the (reasonable) discovery request than it would cost to just pay up and go home.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      David, 4 Oct 2014 @ 11:37am

      Re:

      Except that this is a Freedom of Information request, not a subpoena. It's ok to respond to the best of one's ability.

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Mike-2 Alpha (profile), 5 Oct 2014 @ 2:06am

        Re: Re:

        Actually, this explanation makes a fair bit of sense to me. At least from the perspective of the PD. First, it gives them a reason to set a financial bar to access that could weed out a fair number of requests. That's got to be appealing to them in this situation.

        Second, if someone doesn't like what they find in the information they're given and thinks that they've either held something back or manufactured what they did give them, it lets them cover their asses. They can have someone from the firm stand up in front of a judge, if it gets that far, and say "no, this really is everything that fit their request, and here's why".

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Oct 2014 @ 9:28am

    FOIA Request on FOIA Charges

    We need to send a FOIA request to the Ferguson PD requesting all emails, meeting notes, girlfriends' names, and anything else related to the decision to charge excessive fees for FOIA requests.

    I'm not familiar with the process. Is there a reasonable limit they are allowed to charge?

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Avatar, 5 Oct 2014 @ 1:54am

      Re: FOIA Request on FOIA Charges

      There is. What you're missing is that this is the reasonable charge.

      It looks expensive because it's got to be done meticulously so the other side can't just say "well, that's obviously after they deleted all the juicy e-mail, you should sanction them for underproducing!" That is the difference between "derp, I ran an outlook search and it came back with five e-mails" and "here's the report of our forensics expert". The task is more complicated than you know.

      And yeah, you generally can't file FOIA requests just to harass the office in question. They'll just ignore it and dare you to put it in front of a judge, who will say "get out of my courtroom."

      reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        art guerrilla (profile), 6 Oct 2014 @ 7:17am

        Re: Re: FOIA Request on FOIA Charges

        oh bull fucking shit...
        podunk ferguson PD charges THOUSANDS of dollars for stuff that would be given FOR FREE from the defense dept, cia, nsa, etc ? ? ?
        bull fucking shit, this is NOTHING but a snow job to keep from responding...

        reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 Oct 2014 @ 1:00pm

    Almost seems like a third world country for the lack of rights the citizens are being given. Amazing no one higher up the chain sees anything wrong with how the officials of this city are acting.

    Does not bode well for the rest of the country if the governor and the president see nothing wrong with how average citizens are being treated in ferguson

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Math Man, 5 Oct 2014 @ 6:35am

    Political Class Has Learned Well

    Ferguson officials should announce that they are modeling their release of information to the press after President Obama's administration: No reporter interviews, controlled leaks via political hack journalists, no questions from reporters at press conferences, threats of prosecution for treason for releasing information, surveillance of computers and phone calls, no pictures by the press except for government released official photos, etc. This has worked well for Obama. Seen any resignations from the White House Press corps? They should also use the phrase "most transparent county in the country" as many times as possible in their public statements.

    Specifically on the response to FOIA, Ferguson officials should use the Obama method. Make a reasonable charge, just redact the hell out of the documents and take years to release them. Who knows the Chief might get the Nobel Prize for Peace.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 5 Oct 2014 @ 10:56am

    Capitalizing off of the death/murder of Michael Brown ,can these criminals get any lower , I'm surprised they aren't selling t=shirts and action figures yet.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Ninja (profile), 6 Oct 2014 @ 7:57am

    Hmm, if a FOIA request ends up revealing illegal, unconstitutional or criminal activity the people involved and the govt body should be forced to return 1000 times the value each.

    Also, if the process shows blatant incompetence and inefficiency said body should be fined too.

    I'm sure fees would diminish pretty fast.

    reply to this | link to this | view in chronology ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Use markdown for basic formatting. HTML is no longer supported.
  Save me a cookie
Follow Techdirt
Techdirt Gear
Shop Now: I Invented Email
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Chat
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Recent Stories
Advertisement
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads

Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.