Musician Peter Gabriel Comes Out Against SOPA/PIPA; Website Will Go Dark

from the well,-look-at-that... dept

We keep hearing how the "artists" that the entertainment industry gatekeepers say they're "protecting" are not at all pleased about SOPA and PIPA. For example, we've already seen Ashton Kutcher come out against the bill. The latest is that famed musician Peter Gabriel has said that his own website will go dark in protest tomorrow:
“This year is going to be a very crucial year for the fate of digital rights and freedoms on the internet. We strongly support the campaign against both the Protect IP Act and the Stop Online Piracy Act. For that reason our websites will be down from 05.00 GMT for 24 hours in support of the campaign.

Please check out http://www.avaaz.org/en/save_the_internet/ if you want to read more/sign the petition.

Thank you.”

Peter Gabriel
It's been really sickening to see our usual critics (some of whom are admitted lobbyists in favor of the bills) insist that anyone against the bills is "in favor of piracy." Clearly, many people from all over the place -- including those who make their living in the "entertainment business" are against the bills. Or are we going to hear that Peter Gabriel just wants free stuff, too?


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    icon
    Jeff (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 11:18am

    Gabriel is a class act

    I have been a fan of his since '81 (OMG!) - he has always proven to be an artist willing to take a risk and try new mediums (think EVE, OD2 and MUDDA).

    It is no surprise that he would come out against SOPA/PIPA because he has always been a supporter of human rights and human equality.

    His stance shows he is a man of conscience and empathy, and I will support his artistic endeavors even more now!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 11:33am

    Go for it Peter, shock the monkies.lol

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Anonymouse, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 11:36am

    OMG Peter's such a freetard!!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 11:37am

    One more freetard piracy apologist, just like Ashton Kutcher.
    They just want free stuff.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 11:40am

    Wow millionaires are against SOPA and PIPA, that should show all the paytards something.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    icon
    Yakko Warner (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 11:41am

    Peter Gabriel's all about free stuff.

    He expects to just lay down some tracks and get a steam train for free.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    icon
    Ninja (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 11:41am

    Re:

    Or are we going to hear that Peter Gabriel just wants free stuff, too?

    Does the post above answer your question?

    (I'm inclined to think the post is actually not serious but who knows? there's no /troll tag)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Poster, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 11:42am

    Looks like the SOPA protests just went Big Time.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 11:44am

    Re:

    SledeHammer.lol

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 11:45am

    INB4

    All the websites that don't go dark tomorrow are clearly in favor of SOPA/PIPA.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    icon
    weneedhelp (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 11:46am

    Go Peter

    I ate dinner with him in the Tower Theater catering. He is an extremely intelligent man. He was explaining to us why he had to tour while selling many many albums. Not one ounce of I am better than you was felt. Great guy, great crew to work with. Does not surprise me at all.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 11:48am

    Re: INB4

    Or clearly against your opinion. You know Sopa and Pipa will help kill trolls, the only redeeming qualities of either bill.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Rich Kulawiec, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 11:48am

    An apropos quote from the man himself

    "You can blow out a candle
    But you can't blow out a fire
    Once the flames begin to catch
    The wind will blow it higher"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
     
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 11:56am

    Wealthy old man tries to look hip by protesting another country's legislation that he clearly hasn't read.

    real cool.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    icon
    btrussell (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:00pm

    Re: Gabriel is a class act

    Are you kidding? They are trying to infringe on his "Sledgehammer!"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:04pm

    Re:

    How the hell would you know what he has read and what he hasn't. Why do you need to make stuff up that you clearly don't know? Maybe because your position has nothing factual to back it up?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  17.  
    icon
    jupiterkansas (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:05pm

    Re:

    He may be a millionaire, but he is trying to support many of "not rich" artists with his Realworld record label, which is also going dark.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  18.  
    icon
    gorehound (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:07pm

    Re: Gabriel is a class act

    Good for him.I am just a humble old punk rocker but I have already taken down both bigmeathammer.com and goreproductions.com which is my only method of income at the moment.They will stay down for a few days.
    And by the way I still remember seeing Genesis in Boston in the early 70's high on Acid I think.They had the coolest light show w/slides and Gabriel changed into a lot of weird costumes.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  19.  
    icon
    pixelpusher220 (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:08pm

    Re:

    whether a troll or just sarcasm it raises an interesting point.

    We shouldn't blindly assume that people coming out against SOPA/PIPA are altruistic in their reasons. Once something gains enough inertia, lots of people will want to be on the side with the momentum.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  20.  
    icon
    Hephaestus (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:11pm

    Re:

    Mike Can we get a give the troll a cookie button? or just "Give Cookie"

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  21.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:15pm

    Re: Re:

    Indeed, once the lobbyists are paid better not to support SOPA, you can be sure they'll flipflop.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  22.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:20pm

    It's been really sickening to see our usual critics (some of whom are admitted lobbyists in favor of the bills) insist that anyone against the bills is "in favor of piracy."

    As someone that was very pro-Metallica during the Napster case, and a staunch RIAA supporter, it's exactly that sort of attitude, among other things, that has slowly turned me against their industry. Back then I bought their argument that infringement was theft.

    However, after years of watching them blatantly lie and twist fact to suit there agenda, deride anyone who disagreed with them as supporting "thieves" and therefore no better than criminals themselves, and then engage in behavior I considered to border on (if not outright cross the line on) extortion and blackmail (both against their customers and client) I've found it increasing impossible over the years to support, or even care about, anything they have to say.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  23.  
    icon
    Gwiz (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:20pm

    Re: Re:

    Mike Can we get a give the troll a cookie button? or just "Give Cookie"

    Nah, If you give a troll a cookie, they'll want a glass of mike. If you give a troll a glass of milk, they'll want complete control over the entire Internet.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  24.  
    icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:20pm

    Re: Re: INB4



    What? They make it easy to take down sites by posting a lot of links in the comments of sites I don't like.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  25.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:21pm

    Re: Re:

    haha, a "feed the troll" button =P

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  26.  
    icon
    technomage (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:25pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    "Nah, If you give a troll a cookie, they'll want a glass of mike."

    lol...poor Mike, he's become fluids for the trolls...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  27.  
    identicon
    sneeje, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:25pm

    Re: Re:

    As long as we apply that assumption both ways, then yes.

    Just because you are for the bills, doesn't mean you are supporting the "greater good" either.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  28.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:27pm

    Re: Re: Re: INB4

    Yep, You got it anyone can oppose your view and use the pipa or sopa to make a fraudulent claim to have it removed.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  29.  
    icon
    Gwiz (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:29pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    lol...poor Mike, he's become fluids for the trolls...

    Yeah, just noticed that awful typo as you were posting.

    [Note to Self]: Self, you really need to proofread better!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  30.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:30pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    Treat trolls like the gigapet, feed them play with them, then forget about them and they DIE.lol

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  31.  
    identicon
    Some Guy, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:35pm

    Filthy pirates like Peter Gabriel shouldn't be allowed to steal from honest, hard-working and respectable musicians like Peter Gabriel.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  32.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:39pm

    Re: Re:

    It's obvious he hasn't read it. Anyone that actually takes the time to read it immediately understands that Google, Masnick, et al are all lying about how bad it supposedly is.

    I wonder how much in donations Jimmy Wales was promised if he took the site dark; I know they've really been hurting for money recently.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  33.  
    icon
    Jeffrey Nonken (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:39pm

    Re: INB4

    I'm not going to darken my website or any of my blogs because... I'm in support of SOPA/PIPA?

    Wrong. I'm not doing it because I HAVE ZERO READERS. It's not worth the effort. It would be a cry in the wilderness, a tempest in a teacup. Crickets will chirp. Somewhere a dog will bark.

    It's OK. Once SOPA or PIPA passes, you can use it to shut down my website yourself. I'm sure there's a phrase or a line of code that you could use to get it done.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  34.  
    icon
    Capitalist Lion Tamer (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:40pm

    Well, this is all well and good for established artists with a long history of innovation in the fields of claymation and computer animation but what about the thousands of independent artists that need the major labels and their legislation to survive? Who will protect their efforts and stop-motion animation?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  35.  
    icon
    Capitalist Lion Tamer (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:41pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    I'd rather have the option to spin them around and aim them at each other like Furbies, thus sparing everyone else the pain of actually having to respond to their nonsensical noises and eye movements.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  36.  
    icon
    Machin Shin (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 12:52pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Don't we already have something like that?

    Oh, I'm sorry I was thinking of Congress. They make even less sense then a room full of Furbies talking to each other.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  37.  
    icon
    Nastybutler77 (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 1:01pm

    Re: Re:

    Someone's sarcasm meter is on the fritz...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  38.  
    icon
    btrussell (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 1:04pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    If you are going to call someone a liar, you should back it up with proof.

    Or are you just trying to show off your internet balls?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  39.  
    icon
    Some Other AC (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 1:10pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    It is not obvious one way or the other. Regardless of this, a well known and mostly well respected(there are always dissenters) musician has come out and stated he does not support either SOPA or PIPA.
    And as usual, I will add this to your inane comments:

    "I wonder how much in donations Jimmy Wales was promised if he took the site dark; I know they've really been hurting for money recently."
    Citation Please!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  40.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 1:15pm

    Celebrity Opinions

    On any other day, I could give a rat's ass for what ANY celebrity thinks (what, you think they have some special insight? Go as a Kardashian about anything).

    Today, however, I do believe that we should credit those that are actually thinking.

    Go Peter Gabriel!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  41.  
    icon
    Nastybutler77 (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 1:15pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    It's obvious he hasn't read it. Anyone that actually takes the time to read it immediately understands that Google, Masnick, et al are all lying about how bad it supposedly is.

    I wonder how much in donations Jimmy Wales was promised if he took the site dark; I know they've really been hurting for money recently.


    Wow. That's a lot of bullshit for one short post.

    So your defacto arguement is, "If you dissagree with PIPA/SOPA you haven't read it as no one upon reading it could have any issues with it." What a crock. Come up with a real arguement and get back to me.

    And if Wales wanted to line his pockets he'd take the easy money and side with the **IA's since they're the ones throwing cash at anyone who will support this horrible, horrible bill.

    Troll hard, retard.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  42.  
    icon
    Jeffrey Nonken (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 1:20pm

    Re: Re:

    Nope, I doubt his reasons are altruistic.

    Mine aren't, either. Purely selfish. I want to keep writing code. I want the economy not to collapse, so I can continue working and living in a house and eating, feeding my family, send my kids to college. I want to have more choices about the movies I can watch and the music I can listen to, not fewer. I don't want to live in the fear that any random remark I make could be used to take away my freedom or my belongings.

    And I want that for my friends, too. And their friends. And everybody else in the world. Not because I'm altruistic, but because I like sharing things that I like, and I like helping people. I like it when other people are happy, it makes me happy.

    I'd be inclined to call that "enlightened self-interest" but when you get down to it, my reasons are all selfish. I want the world to be a certain way.

    It's easy to question the motives of somebody you don't know, especially if he's rich, famous, or (worse yet) both. And yet... I bet he wants the same thing I want. He wants the world to be a certain way. I'm sure we all differ in the details but in the end, everybody does things for selfish reasons. Whether it's direct gain of desired resources or feeling good about the rightness of your actions, you do things because you anticipate that the results and consequences of your actions will satisfy a need in yourself.

    So while it's easy to be all cynical about Peter Gabriel's motives, in the long run, he's no more selfish than anybody else. We all try to fulfill our needs and, if we have energy left over, our desires.

    For myself, I'm not going to refuse his help just because he has more money than I have. I'm also not going to assume that any successful artist must necessarily have a selfish, greedy hidden agenda when it comes to this. Maybe Peter Gabriel just sees SOPA and PIPA as threats to his business model? Sounds good to me. Screw altruism, give me enlightened self-interest every time. Then you know where you stand.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  43.  
    icon
    Jeffrey Nonken (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 1:21pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    I dunno. Works either way for me. :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  44.  
    icon
    cjstg (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 1:23pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    lobbyists are tools, just like lawyers. you pay them and they do what you want them to. today they support a bill; the next they're against it. don't blame the lobbyists. they are a symptom of a system run a muck.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  45.  
    icon
    cjstg (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 1:27pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    yeah, i actually kinda liked they way that was going. "...they'll want a glass of mike," and if you give them a glass of mike, they'll want to control the comments, and if you let them control the comments, they'll own the website, and if they own the website they'll shut it down.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  46.  
    icon
    cjstg (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 1:33pm

    Re: Celebrity Opinions

    i think there is certainly a difference between talentless hacks like kk and someone like peter gabriel. gabriel has been innovative since the beginning both in his entertainment and business models. his is probably an opinion that should be listened to on any day. the entire works of kk could go away and our society would lose nothing.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  47.  
    icon
    John Fenderson (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 1:35pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    I will absolutely blame lobbyists, but not solely them. They know they are tools being used to degrade and destroy much of what is good about this country and do it anyway. They are selfish bastards that put their personal profit over the good of their fellow man. They are reprehensible.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  48.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 1:35pm

    Re:

    That is exactly why I don't want to "fix" copyright, it is to corrupt already to be fixed and it need to be nixed.

    86 copyright now!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  49.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 1:41pm

    Re: Re: INB4

    You be wrong someone reads your blog and big things comes in small packages.

    Think biotechnology, nanotechnology, all those tinny things don't do much on their own but combined they generate something.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  50.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 1:44pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    That can't be true I read the bills and reached the opposite conclusion of yours, that in fact Masnick, Google, etc are all right, those bills are a threat to democracy, may be the greatest threat democracy has ever faced.

    This is a fight between evil monopolies and good freedom.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  51.  
    icon
    princefeliz (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 2:01pm

    SOPA/PITA

    Everyone who owns a website and does not support SOPA/PIPA should take it down tomorrow as well.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  52.  
    icon
    Atkray (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 2:20pm

    Re: Re:

    "Mike Can we get a give the troll a cookie button?"

    It is to the right of the funny button.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  53.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 2:29pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re:

    No it isn't.

    It's about people that steal movies and music and the tech companies that make money off that theft.

    That's it.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  54.  
    icon
    Brendan (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 3:01pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Then why doesn't the text of the bill(s) say that? The wording as is appears to be much much broader.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  55.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 3:09pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    No, it isn't.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  56.  
    icon
    TtfnJohn (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 5:01pm

    Re:

    The National Film Board of Canada where they all go anyway? :)

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  57.  
    icon
    Samuel Abram (profile), Jan 17th, 2012 @ 5:21pm

    Re: SOPA/PITA

    I certainly have. My website, samuelabram.com, will go dark tomorrow.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  58.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 7:11pm

    Re:

    Oh look, more hypocrisy from freetards that scream about free speech and freedom.

    They try to block pure speech because they don't have the same opinion.

    A bigger bunch of slimy douchebags you will never find.

    Here's what was said:

    "Wealthy old man tries to look hip by protesting another country's legislation that he clearly hasn't read.

    real cool."

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  59.  
    identicon
    teka, Jan 17th, 2012 @ 7:50pm

    Re: Re:

    what?

    "pure speech"? is this a newspeek term that i am not familer with?

    Oh, I get it!
    It is "pure speech" when a conglomerate of megacorporate interests and bought politicians are speaking and just "screaming freetards" when actual people and organizations that would be affected try to speak up.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  60.  
    icon
    PaulT (profile), Jan 18th, 2012 @ 12:40am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    While SOPA has been delayed, why don't you go off and formulate an argument that's not typically found in schoolyards? Lying about others and name calling don't really help your position.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  61.  
    icon
    PaulT (profile), Jan 18th, 2012 @ 1:08am

    Re: Re:

    Nobody's blocking your freedom of speech, they're just saving other posters from reading the ramblings of a drooling idiot who can't accept that people *have* read the bill and reached a different conclusion on its impact (or even agree that no such legislation is necessary until you get your business models adjusted to reality).

    Anyone who chooses to read your foolish idiocy is still free to do so, however. We're not the ones trying to censor the internet because someone hurt our feelings or forced us to actually work for a living - that would be the people *you* worship.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  62.  
    icon
    PaulT (profile), Jan 18th, 2012 @ 1:19am

    Re: Celebrity Opinions

    I agree that I don't care what some celebrity has to say about most subjects. But, this isn't merely a celebrity mouthing off, it's a successful businessman stating his opinion about the very industry he's been involved with for decades - and siding against those who claim to be working for him. That he also happens to be a famous musician is almost incidental.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  63.  
    identicon
    GrownUp, Jan 18th, 2012 @ 3:13am

    Re: Re:

    I grieve.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  64.  
    icon
    Marcel de Jong (profile), Jan 18th, 2012 @ 4:08am

    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

    Look here, retard, SOPA wouldn't even be able to take down ThePirateBay, because TPB has a .com address.

    So how is it about stopping people who """"""steal"""""" movies and music?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  65.  
    identicon
    berzley, Jan 18th, 2012 @ 8:21pm

    Stop SOPA

    I have a facebook event spreading the word and encouraging users to protest and contact represenatives
    http://www.facebook.com/events/331207713568213/
    Please check it out

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  66.  
    identicon
    The Luke Witnesser, Jan 20th, 2012 @ 5:01am

    Here lies the truth about SOPA/PIPA that even TechDirt has yet to report: what MPAA, RIAA, and Hollywood execs do not want you to see.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJIuYgIvKsc
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzS5rSvZXe8

    The truth behind why these big companies responsible for SOPA and PIPA are also responsible for piracy itself is far more insidious than even their outmoded business model.

    Hint: can you say, do as I say so I can crush you under heel?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This