by Mike Masnick
Fri, Apr 1st 2011 12:50pm
While we've already been suitably stumped over the question of how the NY Times spent $40 million dollars to create the Emperor's New Paywall, perhaps we should take a more proactive view and discuss what else they could have done with that $40 million to put it to use more productively. That link has a few suggestions, from creating better products to investing in startups. I'm still wondering why it didn't use that money to simply create more value for users -- more features, more tools to keep them coming back, greater access to journalists and each other, more community features, etc. So how else do people think they could have spent that $40 million more productively?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- DOJ Asserts Its Desire To Live In A Fantasy World Where Publicly-Disclosed Documents Haven't Been Publicly Disclosed
- Journalists Worry About Facebook Hosting News; Is That Similar To Musicians Worried About Spotify Hosting Music?
- District Court Says You Can (Probably) Photograph Police, But Only With A Regular Camera, Not A Drone
- Barrett Brown Loses Email Access For A Year After Using Email To Complain About Prison
- China's Great Firewall Turned Around: Why China Wants To Censor Global Internet