by Mike Masnick
Fri, Apr 1st 2011 12:50pm
While we've already been suitably stumped over the question of how the NY Times spent $40 million dollars to create the Emperor's New Paywall, perhaps we should take a more proactive view and discuss what else they could have done with that $40 million to put it to use more productively. That link has a few suggestions, from creating better products to investing in startups. I'm still wondering why it didn't use that money to simply create more value for users -- more features, more tools to keep them coming back, greater access to journalists and each other, more community features, etc. So how else do people think they could have spent that $40 million more productively?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Techdirt Podcast Episode 35: Kevin Smith On How To Be Yourself And Make A Living
- Chilling Effects: UK Police Admit To Investigating Journalists For Covering Snowden Leaks
- NY Times Falsely Claims ISIS Is Using Encryption & Couriers Because Snowden
- UK Confuses Gullible Reporter Into Believing It Changed Its Position On Encryption
- NYTimes Exposes Giant Fake Diploma Mill Operating Out Of Pakistan; Company Threatens Everyone With Defamation