by Mike Masnick
Fri, Apr 1st 2011 12:50pm
While we've already been suitably stumped over the question of how the NY Times spent $40 million dollars to create the Emperor's New Paywall, perhaps we should take a more proactive view and discuss what else they could have done with that $40 million to put it to use more productively. That link has a few suggestions, from creating better products to investing in startups. I'm still wondering why it didn't use that money to simply create more value for users -- more features, more tools to keep them coming back, greater access to journalists and each other, more community features, etc. So how else do people think they could have spent that $40 million more productively?
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Judge Blocks Release Of Anti-Abortion Videos As The Arbiter Of Journalism
- Cops Getting Free License Plate Readers In Exchange For 25% Of The 'Take' And All The Driver Data Vigilant Can Slurp
- NY Times Files Ridiculous Copyright Lawsuit Over Book That Mocks NYT For Glamorizing War
- South Carolina Politicians Propose Ridculous Plan To Register Journalists... To Make A Statement About Gun Control
- NY Times Gets It Right: Officials Calling For More Surveillance Are Proven Liars; Don't Listen To Them