by Mike Masnick
Wed, Mar 30th 2011 9:59pm
The UK's ongoing attack on free speech continues, with a judge issuing a "superinjunction" against anyone in the UK identifying who "Mr Z" is in a libel case. This is apparently the first time such a superinjunction has been used in a libel case. Apparently, Mr Z is upset at some relatives who are accusing him of "misappropriating money from the trust fund and of a sex offence," both of which the mysterious Mr. Z insists are not true. Apparently the allegations have been published on a blog somewhere, but UK publications are forbidden from even giving people enough information to find that. Of course, all of this makes me wonder how effective any of this can be. It's really only a matter of time until people figure out who he is, and all this "super" secrecy is probably only increasing interest in what sounds like a pretty boring family feud otherwise.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- EFF Lawsuit Challenges DMCA's Digital Locks Provision As First Amendment Violation
- Turkey Blocks Wikileaks After It Dumps Nearly 300,000 Turkish Gov't Emails
- Federal Revenge Porn Bill Not As Bad As It Could Have Been, Still Probably Unconstitutional
- Newt Gingrich: Merely Visiting An ISIS Or Al Qaeda Website Should Be A Felony
- Why Is The UK's Intellectual Property Office Praising National Portrait Gallery's Copyfraud Claims Over Public Domain Images?