by Mike Masnick
Wed, Mar 30th 2011 9:59pm
The UK's ongoing attack on free speech continues, with a judge issuing a "superinjunction" against anyone in the UK identifying who "Mr Z" is in a libel case. This is apparently the first time such a superinjunction has been used in a libel case. Apparently, Mr Z is upset at some relatives who are accusing him of "misappropriating money from the trust fund and of a sex offence," both of which the mysterious Mr. Z insists are not true. Apparently the allegations have been published on a blog somewhere, but UK publications are forbidden from even giving people enough information to find that. Of course, all of this makes me wonder how effective any of this can be. It's really only a matter of time until people figure out who he is, and all this "super" secrecy is probably only increasing interest in what sounds like a pretty boring family feud otherwise.
If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- West Point Prof Who Called For Killing Of Academics Opposed To US Terror War Resigns
- Popehat v. James Woods SLAPP-down Match; Coming Soon To A Court Near You
- UK Music Collection Society PRS Sues SoundCloud
- Virginia Police Force BBC Reporters To Delete Camera Footage Of Police Pursuit Of Shooter
- As Part Of Its War On Encryption, Russia Briefly Blocks All Of Wikipedia Over One Weed Reference